1 / 21

Capital Management using DFA

Capital Management using DFA. Tom Weidman XL America CAS - November 14, 2001. Today’s Agenda. Company Case Study: DFA Model 2000: results & critique Planning for DFA Model 2001 Observations following 9-11. What can DFA do?. strategic planning operational planning valuation

Download Presentation

Capital Management using DFA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Capital Management using DFA Tom Weidman XL America CAS - November 14, 2001

  2. Today’s Agenda • Company Case Study: • DFA Model 2000: results & critique • Planning for DFA Model 2001 • Observations following 9-11

  3. What can DFA do? • strategic planning • operational planning • valuation • product development • pricing • reinsurance/retrocessional structure

  4. DFA Obstacles • DFA is complex • each company and underwriting portfolio is unique • risk/reward measures are numerous • management not aware of DFA

  5. DFA 2000 - Process • Objective: determine capital requirements by major operating unit as a check on S&P’s capital model • Capital requirement = probability of insolvency @ AA rating level • Working team consisted of members of each operating unit for underwriting and liability modeling plus corporate investment representative for asset model assumptions • Operating units met regularly from April through August to discuss and critique relevant assumptions

  6. DFA 2000 - Process • Utilized DFA software - Finesse version 3.1 • Monte Carlo simulation using 5000 iterations of possible annual outcomes • Simulated 5 years of future projections using 12/99 balance sheet and 5-year forecast as base case • Dynamic approach allows future contingent decision options • LOBs within business units not highly correlated • Underwriting cycle similar for all business units

  7. DFA 2000 - Results Major drivers of capital requirement in order of magnitude: • property catastrophe aggregation including scenarios with more than 1 event per year - material affects to capital and future years’ investment income • loss reserve adequacy especially for longer-tail casualty business [used 6/30/2000 view of 12/99 reserve adequacy] • pricing adequacy • investment strategy

  8. DFA 2000 - Future Objectives • All business units have a working model but need: (1) revisions to match product line alignment and (2) an aggregate companywide model to quantify additional capital benefit of diversification among business units • Uses include budgeting and cash flow projections, capital allocation, reinsurance structure evaluation and asset strategy optimization • Working team will review current model capabilities against alternative DFA approaches • Continue discussions with S&P regarding value of alternative capital models for property-casualty insurance

  9. DFA 2001 Objectives • Develop RAROC approach: • for all major business units & aggregate • need economic return methodology especially for long-tailed businesses • incorporate diversification benefit • Separate investment risk and underwriting risk (investment function becomes its own profit center)

  10. RAROC 2001 Objectives • Include capital projections within business planning, reporting, and performance measurement • Link RAROC to GAAP • Hire consultant, revisit software • Continue to discuss with rating agencies

  11. Revisit Software: Issues • Snapshot vs. multi-year • VaR/risk of ruin vs. total cost of ruin • stochastic DFA vs. statistical model specification • Accounting vs. Economic return • RAROC hurdle rate

  12. S&P Capital Model • Benefit: - Provides quantifiable, “formulaic” minimum ‘AA’ surplus standards we must maintain • Shortfalls: - Not dynamic…does not measure embedded economic value, reflects point in time VaR approach rather than multi-year nature of longer-tailed business - Inadequate diversification credit - Catastrophe model is unreasonable and a ‘black box’.

  13. Rating Agency View of DFA • Complexity prohibits universal application to 3000 P&C companies • very few companies using DFA • DFA capital indications may be greater than rating agency models

  14. Observations following 9-11 • Extreme value theory gets a boost… http://www.risklab.ch • Correlations among lines are higher • insurer risk management practices can be improved

  15. Observations following 9-11 • Why are insurance industry returns on capital sub-par? • Industry is overcapitalized…due to rating agencies • Industry pricing is inadequate • Industry structure fosters ‘excessive’ competition

  16. Observations following 9-11 • Is the insurance industry overcapitalized? • Yes: very few downgrades • No: new capital raised is $15 billion and growing

  17. Observations following 9-11 • Is industry pricing inadequate? • Yes….Warren Buffett says so • No….capital is pouring in, stock prices are higher than pre 9-11

  18. Observations following 9-11 Buffett, in his letter to shareholders, listed three basic rules for running an insurance company. He said all three were broken at General Re during the past three years: "Only accept risks you are able to properly evaluate . . . and confine your underwriting to business that, after an evaluation of all relevant factors, including remote loss scenarios, carries the expectancy of profit." "Limit the business accepted in a manner that guarantees you will suffer no aggregation of losses from a single event or from related events that will threaten your solvency." "Avoid business involving moral risk: No matter what the rate, you can't write good contracts with bad people."

  19. Observations following 9-11 • Is the insurance industry structure sub-optimal? • Yes: it traps capital, uses capital inefficiently, is not sufficiently diversified • No: there will always be winners and losers, investors can diversify more efficiently

  20. Profiting from DFA….at a professional level • DFA increases demand for actuaries’ skills • DFA facilitates and increases actuary’s interaction with: • CUO, CIO, CFO, CRO (internal) • rating analysts, investment analysts, reinsurers, investment managers (external) • DFA expands the breadth of the P/C actuary’s responsibilities

More Related