1 / 20

Montenegro Statistical Training

This session provides an overview of the Integrated File Number (IFN) system, including its conceptual, technical, and organizational implications. The session also discusses the development and implementation of IFN in the criminal justice system.

vivianam
Download Presentation

Montenegro Statistical Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MontenegroStatistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 5, February 3, 13.15 – 14.45 Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – The Integrated File Number DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 2009-2011 Phase three – Training With funding from the European Union

  2. The Integrated File NumberIntroduction Why would you want an Integrated File Number (IFN). Possible reasons: To track the crime of an offender through the system To link different datasets for statistical reasons To look at the criminal history of offender(s) Other?

  3. Organization of Statistics ‘Data Monitoring’ has three aspects: Operational informationThe actual data for handling a specific crime/case Management InformationData to monitor the performance of the organizations StatisticsData for research and Policy Although, ideally, these will be feed from the same source of data the use and the users are completely different I will talk about statistics, unless specifically mentioned otherwise

  4. The Integrated File NumberIntroduction Be aware that: An (automated) IFN is not always necessary (not really for reasons 1 and 2 in previous slide) Hardly any country has an IFN. Why would that be? To implement and maintain a truly consistent IFN is very costly My recommendation: Start small (e.g. Common case number for Prosecution and Courts)

  5. Contents • Conceptual implications • Technical implications • Organizational implications

  6. The Integrated File NumberConceptual implications The first two questions to answer are of course: What is the scope of the ‘Integration’?Police – Prosecution – Courts – PrisonsOr even more? What does a ‘file’ mean? The police registration? A case? All issues with counting units etc are applicable here.

  7. The Integrated File NumberConceptual implications The scope: The ideal would be that all justice related agencies use the same IFN. One can also consider: Probation service Agencies responsible for Community Services Special care institutes for addicts Victim care Legal aid Immigration authorities Again: it depends on what you want to do with the IFN

  8. The Integrated File NumberConceptual implications The file: The basic question to answer is here is if the ‘file number’ should be crime-oriented or offender-oriented. An offender oriented approach is conceptually more clear: it is always one person. What you probably really want is both: the possibility to track a crime as well as an offender through the system

  9. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications How to implement the IFN technically is again highly dependent on the use of the IFN. Some scenario’s and possibilities: Restricted to only a few agencies, e.g. Prosecution and Courts A uniform person number for each crime A unique person number regardless of the specific crime Technical implementation is highly dependent on whether manual or electronic datasets are used

  10. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 1: Restricted to only a few agencies, e.g. Prosecution and Courts This could be simple to implement. Particularly if the counting unit (the case) is more or less the same. The sender (prosecution) should take care that a really unique (!) case number is assigned. The receiver (courts) has to add this unique case number to all files/records belonging to the case.

  11. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 2: A uniform person number for each crime The idea is that there is a central register with a unique person number for all persons that are – at that moment – known to one of the justice agencies. As soon as a person – suspected of having committed a crime – is known to the police, the personal details of this person are checked with this central register. There are two possibilities:

  12. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 2: A uniform person number for each crime (2) The person is not yet present in the register. He/she will get a unique number. This number is returned to the police. The fact that he/she is now known in the police dataset is added to the register. The person is already known in the register. The number is returned to the police. The fact that he/she is now known in the police dataset is added to the register (if not there already)

  13. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 2: A uniform person number for each crime (3) The central register thus consists of: Personal details (name, date of birth, ...)(preferably non-changing data) The assigned unique number A list with all agencies where the person is at this moment ‘active’, possibly but not necessarily with their own person or case number.This list could be like this:

  14. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 2: A uniform person number for each crime (4) Person name: Paul Smit; index number 2468

  15. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 2: A uniform person number for each crime (5) As soon as a person is not ‘active’ anymore in a specific agency a message is sent to the central register If all records in the central register have a ‘Date removed’, the person could be removed from the register

  16. The Integrated File NumberTechnical implications Scenario 3: A unique person number regardless of the specific crime Basically this is the same as scenario 2. But now the person is not removed from the register. In this scenario, the register could be linked to a criminal record register

  17. The Integrated File NumberOrganizational implications The organizational consequences for scenario 1 are not too far-reaching: For manual administrations changing forms For computerized administrations modifications are needed Instructions to employees

  18. The Integrated File NumberOrganizational implications The organizational consequences for scenario 2 (and 3) are considerable: A separate central agency has to be created maintaining the register. Identification of persons costs a lot of time This central register can not be a manual one All participating agencies have to be connected to the central register

  19. The Integrated File NumberRecommendations Firstly: establish the exact needs. Why do you want an IFN Start small! With only a few agencies using the IFN and gradually adding more agencies to the system. Scenario 2 (or 3) is the most flexible and is ideal to develop the system incrementally. However, it is expensive.

  20. MontenegroStatistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 5, February 3, 13.15 – 14.45 Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – The Integrated File Number DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 2009-2011 Phase three – Training With funding from the European Union

More Related