1 / 27

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results

Explore the PISA 2009 results for U.S. students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy compared to international benchmarks. Understand proficiency levels and gender disparities in student performance.

vlong
Download Presentation

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010

  2. PISA Background • International student assessment coordinated by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) • 65 participating countries and other education systems • All 34 OECD member countries • 26 non-OECD countries and 5 non-national education systems • Administered every 3 years since 2000

  3. PISA Background • Assessment of 15-year-old students • Content knowledge not limited to school-based curricula • PISA assesses applied knowledge/literacy: • “How well can students nearing the end of compulsory schooling apply their knowledge to real-life situations?” • Three subject areas: • Reading Literacy • Mathematics Literacy • Science Literacy 3

  4. What’s in the PISA 2009 U.S. Report 4

  5. PISA 2009 Reading Literacy Results 5

  6. PISA 2009 ReadingLiteracy: OECD • U.S. average score of 500 not measurably different from the OECD average score of 493 • 6 OECD countries had higher average scores. • 14 were not measurably different from the United States. • 13 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 6

  7. PISA 2009 Reading Literacy: All • Among all participants • 9 had higher average scores than the United States. • 16 were not measurably different. • 39 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 7

  8. PISA 2009 Reading Proficiency Levels • Highest proficiency level is level 6. • Below level 2 students may not be able to consistently “make valid comparisons or contrasts” based on even a single feature in the text or consistently “recognize the main idea in a text unless it is prominent” in the text. • At level 4 students are described by PISA as capable of “difficult reading tasks” and “critically evaluating” a text. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 8

  9. U.S. at the OECD Average for Key Proficiency Levels in Reading • 18 percent scored below level 2 (not measurably different from OECD). • 30 percent scored at or above level 4 (not measurably different from OECD). SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 9

  10. Consistently Higher Average Scores for Females in Reading • U.S. female students scored higher on average (513) than male students (488). • The U.S. female-male difference was smaller than the OECD average difference and the difference in 45 countries and education systems. • Female students scored higher on average than male students in all 65 countries and education systems. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 10

  11. Average U.S. Reading Score Unchanged From 2000 • There was no measurable change in the U.S. average scores over time. • There was no measurable difference between U.S. and the OECD average scores in 2000 or in 2009. • OECD averages are based on 27 OECD member countries that participated in 2000 and 2009. 495 SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 11

  12. PISA 2009 Mathematics Literacy Results 12

  13. PISA 2009 Mathematics Literacy: OECD • U.S. average score of 487 lower than the OECD average score of 496 • 17 OECD countries had higher average scores. • 11 were not measurably different. • 5 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 13

  14. PISA 2009 Mathematics Literacy: All • Among all participants • 23 had higher average scores than the United States. • 12 were not measurably different. • 29 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 14

  15. PISA 2009 Mathematics Proficiency Levels • Highest level of mathematics proficiency is level 6. • Below level 2 students may not be able to consistently “employ basic algorithms,” or make “literal interpretations of the results” of mathematical operations in real-life settings. • At level 4 students can “complete higher order tasks” such as “solving problems that involve visual or spatial reasoning…in unfamiliar contexts.” SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 15

  16. U.S. at OECD Average at PISA Mathematics Proficiency Level 2; Below OECD Average at Level 4 • 23 percent of U.S. students scored below level 2 (not measurably different from OECD average). • 27 percent of U.S. students scored at or above level 4 (smaller than 32 percent for OECD average). 23 SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . * p < .05. Significantly different from the corresponding OECD average percentage at the .05 level of statistical significance. 16

  17. Higher Average Scores for Males in Mathematics • U.S. male students scored higher on average (497) than female students (477). • Male students scored higher on average than female students in 35 countries and education systems; female students scored higher on average than male students in 5 countries. • The OECD average was higher for male students (501) than female students (490). SOURCE: Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) International Data Explorer, PISA 2009. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/idepisa/ . 17

  18. In 2009, the U.S. average score was higher than that in 2006, but not measurably different from the U.S. average in 2003. The U.S. average score was lower than the OECD average score in 2003 and in 2009. OECD averages are based on 29 OECD member countries that participated in 2003 and 2009. Average U.S. Mathematics Score Up From 2006 499* *p < .05. U.S. average is significantly different from the OECD average at the .05 level of statistical significance. **p < .05. U.S. average in 2006 is significantly different from the U.S. average in 2009 at the .05 level of statistical significance. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 18

  19. PISA 2009 Science Literacy Results 19

  20. PISA 2009 Science Literacy: OECD • U.S. average score of 502 not measurably different from the OECD average of 501 • 12 OECD countries had higher average scores. • 12 were not measurably different. • 9 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 20

  21. PISA 2009 Science Literacy: All • Among all participants • 18 had higher average scores than the United States. • 13 were not measurably different. • 33 had lower average scores. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 21

  22. PISA 2009 Science Proficiency Levels • Highest level of science proficiency is level 6. • Below level 2 students may not be able to consistently “provide… explanations in familiar contexts or draw conclusions based on simple investigations” or consistently “make literal interpretations.” • At level 4 students “select and integrate explanations from different disciplines of science or technology” and “link those explanations directly to…life situations.” SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 22

  23. 18 percent of U.S. students scored below level 2 (as did 18 percent in OECD countries, on average). 29 percent of U.S. students scored at or above level 4 (as did 29 percent in OECD countries, on average). U.S. at the OECD Average for Key Proficiency Levels in Science SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 23

  24. Higher Average Scores for Males in Science • U.S. male students scored higher on average (509) than female students (495). • Male students scored higher on average than female students in 11 countries, but female students scored higher on average than male students in 21 countries. • The OECD average for both male and female students was 501. SOURCE: Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) International Data Explorer, PISA 2009. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/idepisa/ . 24

  25. Average U.S. Science Score Up From 2006 • In 2009, the U.S. average score was higher than that in 2006. • The U.S. average score was lower than the OECD average in 2006, but not measurably different than the OECD average in 2009. • OECD averages are based on the 34 OECD member countries. 501 * p < .05. U.S. average is significantly different from the OECD average at the .05 level of statistical significance. **p < .05. U.S. average in 2006 is significantly different from the U.S. average in 2009 at the .05 level of statistical significance. SOURCE: Fleischman et al. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004) . 25

  26. International Data Explorer Website 26

  27. For More Information PISA at NCES: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa Supplemental Tables: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2009/tablefigureexhibit.asp International Data Explorer: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/international/ide/ PISA at OECD: Sophie Vayssettes sophie.vayssettes@oecd.org +(33) 1 45 24 91 68 Contact: Tracy Dell’Angela IES Communications Tracy.DellAngela@ed.gov (202) 219-1412 27

More Related