1 / 43

1. Context

1. Context. The Current Reality. Low and lower-middle income countries make up more than half the world’s economies Low = $875 or less Lower middle = $876 - $3,465 More than 1 billion people subsists on less than $1 a day

vmerrill
Download Presentation

1. Context

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1. Context

  2. The Current Reality • Low and lower-middle income countries make up more than half the world’s economies • Low = $875 or less • Lower middle = $876 - $3,465 • More than 1 billion people subsists on less than $1 a day • In some developing countries, more than 70 percent live on less than $2 a day

  3. U.S. Foreign Aid • Foreign aid is an essential part of U.S. foreign policy • “International aid is one of the most powerful weapons in the war against poverty. Today that weapon is underused and badly targeted.” - Human Development Report 2005 • There are five major categories of foreign assistance

  4. Bilateral assistance (35%) – Direct transfer from one government to another • Assistance for U.S. Political and Security Goals (22%) – nation building, War on Terror, War on Drugs, etc. • Humanitarian aid (13%) – short-term immediate relief • Multilateral aid (7%) - Aid given from a government to an international agency (World Bank, IMF, UNICEF) • Military aid (23%) – Provided to U.S. allies to help them acquire military equipment and training

  5. U.S. Assistance: Who Gets It? • The U.S. provides assistance to about 150 countries • Most are instances of bilateral aid • From 1989-2009, the largest recipients of U.S. aid were: Iraq, Egypt, Israel, and Afghanistan • For 2013, the top recipients were: Israel, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Egypt

  6. 2. Has Assistance Worked?

  7. “The international community’s response to the catastrophic 2010 earthquake in Haiti was one of the largest disaster relief responses ever carried out ... So it may be a bit disconcerting that, three years on, the aid and development community still can’t seem to agree on whether the effort should be regarded as largely a success or a failure.” – Paulson and Murphy, 2013 • No consensus

  8. “Our conclusions are depressing: Taking all available evidence accumulated over 40 years of research into consideration, we have to conclude that the AEL [aid effectiveness literature] has failed to prove that the effect of development aid on growth is statistically significantly larger than zero. We are forced to conclude that aid has not, on average, achieved its stated aims of generating development.” • – Doucouliagos and Paldam, 2008 • No consensus

  9. No consensus • “We re-examine key hypotheses, and find that the effect of aid on growth is positive and statistically significant.” • – Mekasha and Tarp, 2013

  10. Aren’t the Answers Easy? (1) Identify Technical problem contributing to poverty (e.g. Vitamin A deficiency) (2) Make technological solution available (e.g. Vitamin A capsules) (3) Provide sufficient financing to scale up tech solution to meet estimated needs (Required financing = # Vitamin A deficient *Cost per unit of Vitamin A) (4) Repeat for all technical problems contributing to poverty (5) Therefore, aid financing technological solutions  the end of poverty

  11. Why It Might Not be That Easy • Aid money does not spend itself, and technology does not implement itself • Humans spend aid money and implement technology

  12. Celebrities help spread concern, but…

  13. Tend to Ignore the EWoT • Adaptability • Function of: • Knowledge • Incentives

  14. 3. Why Might Aid Fail?

  15. Econ 101 • Given scarcity: • What should be produced and in what quantities? • How? • For whom?

  16. “The economic problem of society is . . . not merely a problem of how to allocate ‘given’ resources—if ‘given’ is taken to mean given to a single mind which deliberately solves the problem set by these ‘data.’ It is rather a problem of . . . the utilization of knowledge which is not given to anyone in its totality.” – Hayek, 1945

  17. What Can Aid Do? • Aid can, in theory, increase predetermined outputs • Aid cannot solve the basic economic problem required for economic progress

  18. The difference between increased outputs and development

  19. “Mulago’s [located in Kampala, Uganda] experience is not unique. Across Sub-Saharan Africa, ‘medical device graveyards’ litter the empty closets and spare corners of hospitals. The World Health Organization estimates that ‘a large proportion (up to 70 percent) of equipment lies idle.’”

  20. Political Competition… • Between recipient governments • Within the donor government • Between NGOs • Among special interests • Implications for those in need: • They have a weak or nonexistent voice • Those in need often do not receive assistance

  21. Food for Peace

  22. Food for Peace “Growing, manufacturing, bagging, shipping and transportation of nutritious U.S. food creates jobs and economic activity here at home, provides support for our U.S. Merchant Marine, essential to our national defense sealift capability, and sustains a robust domestic constituency for these programs not easily replicated in foreign aid programs.” – Letter to Congress and Obama Administration from 60 U.S. food organizations

  23. Food for Peace “I’ve run these operations, and I know that food aid often gets there after everyone’s dead.” – Andrew Natsios, 2013

  24. Bureaucracy • Discretionary budget • Mission creep and hubris • Waste

  25. Unintended Consequences • A complex system has two characteristics • Interconnected units or elements • Entire system exhibits properties different from its individual parts • Reinforce status quo, Corruption, Political Instability, Dependency, Escalation in conflict and human rights violations, etc.

  26. “The cause of this mess is no mystery. Ever since Uganda began receiving generous amounts of foreign aid two decades ago, senior Ugandan politicians and civil servants have been stealing virtually every shilling they can get their hands on … The US, Japan, and Europe also poured in aid, and as they did, ever more outrageous scandals ensued.” – Helen Murphy, “Murder in Uganda,” TheNew York Review of Books, April 3, 2014

  27. 4. Institutions: The Key to Economic Growth

  28. An Illustration Per Capita Income (PPP) = $1,800 Per Capita Income (PPP) = $28,000

  29. Economic Freedom • Economic Freedom means that people are free to trade with others, compete in markets, buy what they want, earn a living in a job they choose, keep what they earn, and own things privately

  30. Economic Freedom and Per Capita Income

  31. Economic Freedom and the Income Level of the Poorest 10%

  32. Economic Freedom and Life Expectancy

  33. What Explains These Outcomes? • Entrepreneurship! • A discovery process which entails: • Experimentation • Trial and error • Success and failure • Profit and loss • Economic freedom (i.e., private property) provides general and overarching rules which allow entrepreneurs to be alert to ideas and to bet on those ideas

  34. The Difficulty of Picking Winners • Ken Olson, chairman/founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 • “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” • Fred Smith’s (FedEx) Yale University Senior Project Grade – Remark from professor: • “The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible.”

  35. Would You Invest?

  36. 5. Summing Up

  37. The question that often arises in discussions of humanitarian issues: What must “we” do to end suffering?

  38. The Myth of the “Man in Charge” • Most people act as if there is an all-powerful person in charge of development • But there is nobody in charge of complex systems • The main effect of the “man in charge” myth is a bias toward unconstrained thinking

  39. The Constrained Approach • Development as discovery • Open ended vs. end states • Removing barriers to discovery • Note that politicians in other countries can do this if they so choose • What role for developed countries? • Inward vs. outward orientation

More Related