"Web" Unwelcome Filtering of Events Leading Up to Jeanne Clery Act - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W

15. 6/30/24, 7:59 AM Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) – Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Associ… Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL): a non-pro?t organization primarily engaged in the dissemination of public records. About: Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL): a non-profit organization primarily engaged in the dissemination of public records. The recent publications/written content of the AACL include a wide range of intertwined issues, which encompass but are not limited to [1] the life and death of Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986); [2] the decision of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) to extend an invitation to then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director William Webster on August 29th 1986, approximately 5 (five) months after the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [3] the decision of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to initiate contact with the Central https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com 1/164

16. 6/30/24, 7:59 AM Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) – Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Associ… Intelligence Agency (CIA) on June 11th 1992 about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [4] the circumstances leading up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990; [5] Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [6] affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [7] sexual abuse as a factor increasing the risk of suicide among girls/women; [8] California’s Sexual Abuse and Cover Up Accountability Act; [9] the September 12th 2012 suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott; [10] the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman; [11] the January 30th 2022 suicide of former Miss United States of America (U.S.A) Cheslie Corrinne Kryst; [12] the commemoration of September 10th as World Suicide Prevention Day (WSPD) by the United States government; [13] the commemoration of the month of May as Mental Health Awareness Month; [14] the commemoration of the month of April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month; [15] the commemoration of the month of March as Women’s History Month; [16] the commemoration of the month of February as Black History Month; [17] the forcible administration of psychotropic drugs in mental asylums and elsewhere; [18] the impact of wiretap on mental health; [19] the defamation and wiretap of Jean Seberg; [20] Kristen Stewart portrayal of Jean Seberg in the 2019 biopic entitled “Seberg;” [21] the induction of Josephine Baker in France’s Pantheon; [22] the defamation complaint filed by Eva Lopez against the New York Police Department (NYPD); [23] the bogus mental illness of “schizophrenia” being extensively linked with Black/African American people after the total and complete discredit of the “drapetomania” diagnosis; [24] the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and it’s applicability in cases of suicides after a documented incident of sexual violence as well as other incidents of racism and/or sexism; [25] the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); [26] Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitations Act; [27] the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA); [28] the prison rape culture within the Missouri Department of Correction (MODOC); [29] the prison rape culture at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI), located in Dublin, California; [30] the Sixth (6 ) Amendment Rights implications of filing a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [31] the Second (2 ) Amendment Rights implications of filing a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [32] the decision of Tara Cable not to file a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act against the Village of Suffern, New York; [33] the August 03rd 2021 report published by the New York Attorney General (NYAG) Letitia James, which made several explicit references to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act in relations to Alyssa McGrath, Ana Liss, Charlotte Bennett, Lindsey Boylan and other women employed by the New York State government; th nd https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com 2/164

17. 6/30/24, 7:59 AM Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) – Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Associ… [34] the Equal Pay Complaint filed by the United States Women’s National Soccer Team (USWNT) in Calendar Year 2016; [35] Eliza Dushku forced arbitration after experiencing sexual harassment at the workplace; [36] the November 29th 2021 employment related murder of Delfina Pan in Miami Beach, Florida; [37] the June 11th 2022 employment related murder of Riley Whitelaw in the State of Colorado; [38] the decision of Teresa Williams to file a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [39] the decision of the University of Missouri to formally and publicly admit on October 05th 2015 that they “need help changing” the racist culture within their university’s system; [40] the decision of Greenfield High School (located Greenfield, Missouri) to terminate the employment English teacher Kim Morrisson (sometime in mid-March 2022) for teaching the book entitled “Dear Martin;” [41] the decision of Greenfield High School (located Greenfield, Missouri) to terminate the employment of English teacher Kim Morrison without taking into account the formal and public October 05th 2015 statement of the University of Missouri, wherein they admitted that they “needed help changing” the racist culture of their university system; [42] California’s Fast Food Accountability Standards & Recovery Act (a.k.a) FAST Recovery Act; [43] the working conditions of tipped workers in the accommodation and food services (AFS) sector; [44] the police harassment of Amelia Powell for wearing bikinis in the City of Everett, Washington; [45] the Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair (CROWN) Act; [46] the double standards in the United States of America (U.S.A) criminal justice system; [47] the race factor in wrongful convictions issued by the judicial branch of the U.S government (the courts); [48] the June 02nd 2016 decision of the California court that handed Brock Turner a 90 (ninety) day prison sentence for the January 18th 2015 rape of Chanel Miller on the campus of Stanford University; [49] the formal/informal ties between Chanel Miller and the San Francisco Public Library (SFPL); [50] the September 06th 2022 interview of Jennifer Lawrence with Vogue Magazine (in part) on the subject of sex-offender Harvey Weinstein; [51] the #MeToo movement; [52] the Genetics Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA); [53] the urgent need to abolish the death penalty particularly in light of the October 05th 2021 state sponsored execution of Ernest Lee Johnson in Missouri; [54] the likely impact of the Emmett Till Antilynching Act in decreasing and eliminating hate crimes in the future; [55] the use of “cancel culture” for the purpose of exacerbating racism in polite company and on social networks such as Twitter; [56] cybersecurity at Michigan State University (MSU) after their extensive links with the child-pornography of sex-offender Lawrence Gerard Nassar; [57] the August 31st 1994 child-marriage license of Aaliyah Dana Haughton in the State of Illinois; [58] the “influx of child-brides” from Afghanistan to the United States of America (U.S.A) following the U.S military https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com 3/164

18. 6/30/24, 7:59 AM Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) – Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Associ… withdrawal from Afganistan on August 30th 2021; [59] the definition in use by the United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) for what constitutes “child-marriage;” [60] the folly of the eugenics movement; [61] the terrible decision of the United States Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 1973 ruling of Roe v Wade(particularly in light of the publicized murders of Alexandria Kostial and Jennifer Rothwell); [62] the urgent need to restore abortion rights in the U.S.A for the purpose of not exacerbating the public health crisis created as a direct consequence of Roe v Wade being overturned; [63] previously “Missing” Alexis Tiara Murphy; [64] the systemic misogyny and sexism fueling the U.S.A gun violence public health epidemic; [65] the systemic discrimination and racism fueling the U.S.A gun violence public health epidemic; [66] the entitlement of the “involuntary celibate” community in America; [67] the March 15th 2022 report of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) United States Secret Service (USSS) that went on to summarize the life of racist and sexist Scott Paul Beierle; [68] the employment related mass-shooting at Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on May 26th 2021; [69] the May 24th 2022 mass-shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas; [70] the January 14th 2013 recommendations of the National Council on Disability (NCD) on gun violence following the December 14th 2012 mass-shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, located in the State of Connecticut; [71] income inequality among Bachelor Degree graduates on the basis of race; [72] the U.S.A conflicting domestic/foreign policy on marijuana; [73] Brittney Griner’s incarceration in Russia; [74] the U.S.A counterproductive and unconditional support to the State of Israel; [75] the U.S.A foreign policy towards disability; [76] the perturbing conservatorship of Britney Spears; [77] the vital records of Jessica Alba; [78] the September 07th 2022 report of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) that has gone on to interpret the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)… This website has been launched for the purpose of clarifying the ambiguities behind several website links where the name, the likeness, the image and the appearance of W (formerly known as) Michael A. Ayele often come up in an extremely misleading fashion. W deeply regrets the failed efforts of others to shape and control several narratives, which are not grounded in reality (and supported by credible evidence). W also regrets the failed efforts of others looking to be linked with him by creating negative publicity for the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL). This is the official website of W (formerly) known as Michael A. Ayele: this is also the official website for the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL). https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com 4/164

19. 6/30/24, 7:59 AM Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) – Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Associ… It’s not because you’ve been issued an adverse determination that the decision of the other is beyond reproach from an ethical, historical and moral point of view. In Related News that Have Made Headlines for the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) AboutAmerican Post-Secondary Academic Education With Regards to Affirmative and Effective Consent – # Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of the Circumstances Leading Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act as a Bachelor of Arts Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) th When publishing their January 30 2018 report, the National Council on Disability (NCD) had recognized that [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to college and university students of the United States of America https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com 5/164

20. APPENDIX A.

21. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 November 12, 2020 MR. MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1480829-000 Subject: CLERY, JEANNE ANN Dear Mr. Ayele: This acknowledges receipt of your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request to the FBI. Below you will find check boxes and informational paragraphs about your request, as well as specific determinations required by these statutes. Please read each one carefully. Your request has been received at FBI Headquarters for processing. You submitted your request via the FBI’s eFOIPA system. We have reviewed your request and determined it is consistent with the FBI eFOIPA terms of service. Future correspondence about your FOIPA request will be provided in an email link unless the record’s file type is not supported by the eFOIPA system. We have reviewed your request and determined it is not consistent with the FBI eFOIPA terms of service. Future correspondence about your FOIPA request will be sent through standard mail. The subject of your request is currently being processed and documents will be released to you upon completion. Release of responsive records will be posted to the FBI’s electronic FOIA Library (The Vault), http:/vault.fbi.gov, and you will be contacted when the release is posted. Your request for a public interest fee waiver is under consideration and you will be advised of the decision if fees are applicable. If your fee waiver is not granted, you will be responsible for applicable fees per your designated requester fee category below. For the purpose of assessing any fees, we have determined: As a commercial use requester, you will be charged applicable search, review, and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(I). As an educational institution, noncommercial scientific institution or representative of the news media requester, you will be charged applicable duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(II). As a general (all others) requester, you will be charged applicable search and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(III).

22. Please check the status of your FOIPA request at www.fbi.gov/foiaby clicking on FOIPA Status and entering your FOIPA Request Number. Status updates are adjusted weekly. The status of newly assigned requests may not be available until the next weekly update. If the FOIPA has been closed the notice will indicate that appropriate correspondence has been mailed to the address on file. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” The FOIPA Request number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division

23. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 February 25, 2021 MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1480829-000 Subject: CLERY, JEANNE ANN Dear Michael Ayele: The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a. Below you will find check boxes under the appropriate statute headings which indicate the types of exemptions asserted to protect information which is exempt from disclosure. The appropriate exemptions are noted on the enclosed pages next to redacted information. In addition, a deleted page information sheet was inserted to indicate where pages were withheld entirely and identify which exemptions were applied. The checked exemption boxes used to withhold information are further explained in the enclosed Explanation of Exemptions. Section 552 (b)(1) (b)(2) (b)(3) (b)(7)(E) (b)(8) Section 552a (d)(5) (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(B) (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(D) (j)(2) (k)(1) (k)(2) (k)(3) (b)(7)(F) (k)(4) (k)(5) (b)(4) (b)(5) (b)(9) (k)(6) (b)(6) (k)(7) 5 page(s) were reviewed and 5 page(s) are being released. Please see the paragraphs below for relevant information specific to your request as well as the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for standard responses applicable to all requests. Document(s) were located which originated with, or contained information concerning, other Government Agency [OGA]. This information has been referred to the OGA(s) for review and direct response to you. We are consulting with another agency. The FBI will correspond with you regarding this information when the consultation is completed. Please refer to the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for additional standard responses applicable to your request. “Part 1” of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. “Part 2” includes additional standard responses that apply to all requests for records about yourself or any third party individuals. “Part3” includes general information about FBI records that you may find useful. Also enclosed is our Explanation of Exemptions.

24. The FOIPA Request Number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” See additional information which follows. The enclosed documents represent the final release of information responsive to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request. It is unnecessary to adjudicate your request for a public interest fee waiver because there are not assessable fees. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division Enclosure(s)

25. FBI FOIPA Addendum As referenced in our letter responding to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request, the FBI FOIPA Addendum provides information applicable to your request. Part 1 of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. Part 2 includes standard responses that apply to requests for records about individuals to the extent your request seeks the listed information. Part 3 includes general information about FBI records, searches, and programs. Part 1: The standard responses below apply to all requests: (i) 5 U.S.C. § 552(c). Congress excluded three categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIPA [5 U.S.C. § 552(c)]. FBI responses are limited to those records subject to the requirements of the FOIPA. Additional information about the FBI and the FOIPA can be found on the www.fbi.gov/foia website. (ii) Intelligence Records. To the extent your request seeks records of intelligence sources, methods, or activities, the FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1), (b)(3), and as applicable to requests for records about individuals, PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(1), (b)(3), and (j)(2)]. The mere acknowledgment of the existence or nonexistence of such records is itself a classified fact protected by FOIA exemption (b)(1) and/or would reveal intelligence sources, methods, or activities protected by exemption (b)(3) [50 USC § 3024(i)(1)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that any such records do or do not exist. Part 2: The standard responses below apply to all requests for records on individuals: (i) Requests for Records about any Individual—Watch Lists. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any individual’s name on a watch list pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(7)(E) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that watch list records do or do not exist. (ii) Requests for Records about any Individual—Witness Security Program Records. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could identify any participant in the Witness Security Program pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(3) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. 3521, and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. (iii) Requests for Records for Incarcerated Individuals. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any incarcerated individual pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. Part 3: General Information: (i) Record Searches. The Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) searches for reasonably described records by searching systems or locations where responsive records would reasonably be found. A standard search normally consists of a search for main files in the Central Records System (CRS), an extensive system of records consisting of applicant, investigative, intelligence, personnel, administrative, and general files compiled by the FBI per its law enforcement, intelligence, and administrative functions. The CRS spans the entire FBI organization, comprising records of FBI Headquarters, FBI Field Offices, and FBI Legal Attaché Offices (Legats) worldwide; Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) records are included in the CRS. Unless specifically requested, a standard search does not include references, administrative records of previous FOIPA requests, or civil litigation files. For additional information about our record searches, visit www.fbi.gov/services/information-management/foipa/requesting-fbi-records. (ii) FBI Records. Founded in 1908, the FBI carries out a dual law enforcement and national security mission. As part of this dual mission, the FBI creates and maintains records on various subjects; however, the FBI does not maintain records on every person, subject, or entity. (iii) Requests for Criminal History Records or Rap Sheets. The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division provides Identity History Summary Checks – often referred to as a criminal history record or rap sheet. These criminal history records are not the same as material in an investigative “FBI file.” An Identity History Summary Check is a listing of information taken from fingerprint cards and documents submitted to the FBI in connection with arrests, federal employment, naturalization, or military service. For a fee, individuals can request a copy of their Identity History Summary Check. Forms and directions can be accessed at www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/identity-history-summary-checks. Additionally, requests can be submitted electronically at www.edo.cjis.gov. For additional information, please contact CJIS directly at (304) 625-5590. (iv) National Name Check Program (NNCP). The mission of NNCP is to analyze and report information in response to name check requests received from federal agencies, for the purpose of protecting the United States from foreign and domestic threats to national security. Please be advised that this is a service provided to other federal agencies. Private Citizens cannot request a name check.

26. EXPLANATION OF EXEMPTIONS SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552 (b)(1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified to such Executive order; (b)(2) (b)(3) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency; specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; (b)(4) (b)(5) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (b)(6) (b)(7) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information ( A ) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, ( B ) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, ( C ) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, ( D ) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, ( E ) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or ( F ) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; (b)(8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (b)(9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552a (d)(5) (j)(2) information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action proceeding; material reporting investigative efforts pertaining to the enforcement of criminal law including efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or apprehend criminals; (k)(1) information which is currently and properly classified pursuant to an Executive order in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy, for example, information involving intelligence sources or methods; (k)(2) investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than criminal, which did not result in loss of a right, benefit or privilege under Federal programs, or which would identify a source who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(3) material maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or any other individual pursuant to the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056; (k)(4) (k)(5) required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records; investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment or for access to classified information, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(6) testing or examination material used to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in Federal Government service the release of which would compromise the testing or examination process; (k)(7) material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished the material pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence. FBI/DOJ

33. APPENDIX B.

35. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 March 7, 2022 MR. MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA 10013 ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1511415-000 Subject: Westminster College (Communications and Opinions) Dear Mr. Ayele: The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a. Below you will find check boxes under the appropriate statute headings which indicate the types of exemptions asserted to protect information which is exempt from disclosure. The appropriate exemptions are noted on the enclosed pages next to redacted information. In addition, a deleted page information sheet was inserted to indicate where pages were withheld entirely and identify which exemptions were applied. The checked exemption boxes used to withhold information are further explained in the enclosed Explanation of Exemptions. Section 552 (b)(1) (b)(2) (b)(3) (b)(7)(E) (b)(8) Section 552a (d)(5) (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(B) (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(D) (j)(2) (k)(1) (k)(2) (k)(3) (b)(7)(F) (k)(4) (k)(5) (b)(4) (b)(5) (b)(9) (k)(6) (b)(6) (k)(7) 2 pages were reviewed and 2 pages are being released. Please see the paragraphs below for relevant information specific to your request as well as the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for standard responses applicable to all requests. Document(s) were located which originated with, or contained information concerning, other Government Agency (ies) [OGA]. This information has been referred to the OGA(s) for review and direct response to you. We are consulting with another agency. The FBI will correspond with you regarding this information when the consultation is completed.

36. Please refer to the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for additional standard responses applicable to your request. “Part 1” of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. “Part 2” includes additional standard responses that apply to all requests for records about yourself or any third party individuals. “Part 3” includes general information about FBI records that you may find useful. Also enclosed is our Explanation of Exemptions. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” The FOIPA Request Number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. See additional information which follows. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division Enclosure(s) This is the final release of information responsive to your FOIPA request. This material is being provided to you at no charge. It is unnecessary to adjudicate your request for a fee waiver at this time, as no applicable fees were assessed. Records that may have been responsive to your request were destroyed. Since this material could not be reviewed, it is not known if it was responsive to your request. Record retention and disposal is carried out under supervision of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Title 44, United States Code, Section 3301 as implemented by Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1228; Title 44, United States Code, Section 3310 as implemented by Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1229.10. Additionally, records that may be responsive to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA)request has been transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). If you wish to review these records, submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to NARA, Special Access and FOIA, 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 5500, College Park, MD 20740-6001. Please reference the file numbers 100-KC-13743 and 100-KC- 14235.

37. FBI FOIPA Addendum As referenced in our letter responding to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request, the FBI FOIPA Addendum provides information applicable to your request. Part 1 of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. Part 2 includes standard responses that apply to requests for records about individuals to the extent your request seeks the listed information. Part 3 includes general information about FBI records, searches, and programs. Part 1: The standard responses below apply to all requests: (i) 5 U.S.C. § 552(c). Congress excluded three categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIPA [5 U.S.C. § 552(c)]. FBI responses are limited to those records subject to the requirements of the FOIPA. Additional information about the FBI and the FOIPA can be found on the www.fbi.gov/foia website. (ii) Intelligence Records. To the extent your request seeks records of intelligence sources, methods, or activities, the FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1), (b)(3), and as applicable to requests for records about individuals, PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(1), (b)(3), and (j)(2)]. The mere acknowledgment of the existence or nonexistence of such records is itself a classified fact protected by FOIA exemption (b)(1) and/or would reveal intelligence sources, methods, or activities protected by exemption (b)(3) [50 USC § 3024(i)(1)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that any such records do or do not exist. Part 2: The standard responses below apply to all requests for records on individuals: (i) Requests for Records about any Individual—Watch Lists. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any individual’s name on a watch list pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(7)(E) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that watch list records do or do not exist. (ii) Requests for Records about any Individual—Witness Security Program Records. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could identify any participant in the Witness Security Program pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(3) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. 3521, and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. (iii) Requests for Records for Incarcerated Individuals. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any incarcerated individual pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. Part 3: General Information: (i) Record Searches. The Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) searches for reasonably described records by searching systems or locations where responsive records would reasonably be found. A standard search normally consists of a search for main files in the Central Records System (CRS), an extensive system of records consisting of applicant, investigative, intelligence, personnel, administrative, and general files compiled by the FBI per its law enforcement, intelligence, and administrative functions. The CRS spans the entire FBI organization, comprising records of FBI Headquarters, FBI Field Offices, and FBI Legal Attaché Offices (Legats) worldwide; Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) records are included in the CRS. Unless specifically requested, a standard search does not include references, administrative records of previous FOIPA requests, or civil litigation files. For additional information about our record searches, visit www.fbi.gov/services/information-management/foipa/requesting-fbi-records. (ii) FBI Records. Founded in 1908, the FBI carries out a dual law enforcement and national security mission. As part of this dual mission, the FBI creates and maintains records on various subjects; however, the FBI does not maintain records on every person, subject, or entity. (iii) Requests for Criminal History Records or Rap Sheets. The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division provides Identity History Summary Checks – often referred to as a criminal history record or rap sheet. These criminal history records are not the same as material in an investigative “FBI file.” An Identity History Summary Check is a listing of information taken from fingerprint cards and documents submitted to the FBI in connection with arrests, federal employment, naturalization, or military service. For a fee, individuals can request a copy of their Identity History Summary Check. Forms and directions can be accessed at www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/identity-history-summary-checks. Additionally, requests can be submitted electronically at www.edo.cjis.gov. For additional information, please contact CJIS directly at (304) 625-5590. (iv) National Name Check Program (NNCP). The mission of NNCP is to analyze and report information in response to name check requests received from federal agencies, for the purpose of protecting the United States from foreign and domestic threats to national security. Please be advised that this is a service provided to other federal agencies. Private Citizens cannot request a name check.

38. EXPLANATION OF EXEMPTIONS SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552 (b)(1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified to such Executive order; (b)(2) (b)(3) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency; specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; (b)(4) (b)(5) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (b)(6) (b)(7) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information ( A ) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, ( B ) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, ( C ) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, ( D ) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, ( E ) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or ( F ) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; (b)(8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (b)(9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552a (d)(5) (j)(2) information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action proceeding; material reporting investigative efforts pertaining to the enforcement of criminal law including efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or apprehend criminals; (k)(1) information which is currently and properly classified pursuant to an Executive order in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy, for example, information involving intelligence sources or methods; (k)(2) investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than criminal, which did not result in loss of a right, benefit or privilege under Federal programs, or which would identify a source who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(3) material maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or any other individual pursuant to the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056; (k)(4) (k)(5) required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records; investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment or for access to classified information, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(6) testing or examination material used to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in Federal Government service the release of which would compromise the testing or examination process; (k)(7) material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished the material pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence. FBI/DOJ

41. 131 M St, N. E., Fifth Floor Washington, D. C. 20507 Free: (833) 827-2920 ASL: (844) 234-5122 FAX: (202) 827-7545 Website: www.eeoc.gov U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Legal Counsel May 16, 2022 VIA: waacl13@gmail.com Michael Ayele (aka) W ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA 10013 Re: FOIA No.: 820-2022-006302 Jeanne Ann Clery’s death Dear Mr. Ayele (aka) W: Your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, received on 03/18/2022, is processed. The paragraph(s) checked below apply. [X] Portions of your request are as follows: [X] Granted; and [X] Procedurally denied as no records fitting the description of the records you seek disclosed exist or could be located after a thorough search. See the comments below for further explanation. [X] You may contact the Acting EEOC FOIA Public Liaison Michael L. Heise for further assistance or to discuss any aspect of your request. In addition, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740- 6001, email at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at (202) 741-5770; toll free 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at (202) 741-5769. The contact information for the FOIA Public Liaison is as follows: Michael L. Heise, EEOC FOIA Public Liaison, Office of Legal Counsel, FOIA Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M. Street, N.E., Fifth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20507, email to FOIA@eeoc.gov, telephone at (202) 921-2542; or fax at (202) 827-7545. [X] If you are not satisfied with the response to this request, you may administratively appeal in writing. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted in 90 days from receipt of this letter to the Office of Legal Counsel, FOIA Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street, NE, 5NW02E, Washington, D.C. 20507, email to FOIA@eeoc.gov; online at https://eeoc.arkcase.com/foia/portal/login, or fax at (202) 827-7545. Your appeal will be governed by 29 C.F.R. § 1610.11. Sincerely, Michael L. Heise Assistant Legal Counsel (Acting) foia@eeoc.gov

42. 820-2022-006302 COMMENTS This office’s response to your request is as follows: (1) Your request for “formal and informal ties that exist between the CIA, the DOJ (FBI), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the National Archives Records Administration (NARA), and Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri,” is granted. The EEOC provides leadership and guidance to federal agencies on all aspects of the federal government's equal employment opportunity program. The requested information is already available online, via EEOC’s public website. See the following link: https://www.eeoc.gov/federal- sector. The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination, by an employer, against a job applicant or an employee. The requested information is already available online, via EEOC’s public website. See the following link: https://www.eeoc.gov/employers. (2) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has previously confirmed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that they have been in contact with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) following the death of Jeanne Ann Clery” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (3) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency, which has previously confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had assigned the case of Jeanne Ann Clery to the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A) on June 11th 1992” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (4) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that Westminster College had extended an invitation to their former Director William Webster on August 29, 1986,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (5) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that William Webster had accepted the invitation extended to him by Westminster College on October 31, 1986,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (6) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that Westminster College extended their invitation to William Webster 4 (four) to 5 (five) months following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (7) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that William Webster accepted the invitation extended to him by Westminster College 6 (six) to 7 (seven) months following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (8) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has implied to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that his alma mater, Westminster College, held (unofficially perhaps) a non-negligible significant interest in the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (9) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has initiated contact the NARA following the FOIA request 2 | P a g e

43. 820-2022-006302 submitted by Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, that was assigned Case No.: 1511415 – 000” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (10) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the FBI as a federal agency which has suggested for Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, to contact the NARA by referencing file numbers 100–KC–13743 and 100–KC–14235” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (11) Your request for “the communications between the FBI and NARA on the subject of file numbers 100–KC–13743 and 100–KC–14235” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (12) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the CIA as a federal agency which has assigned the FOIA request submitted by Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a. W, on the subject of Jeanne Clery’s death, Case No. F–2021–01641” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (13) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the CIA as a federal agency which has to this day failed to acknowledge that the FBI had reassigned the criminal investigation they had opened following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery to [the CIA] on or around June 11, 1992,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (14) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the CIA as a federal agency which has to this day failed to disclose the content of the investigation that was assigned to it by the FBI on or around June 11, 1992,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. This response was prepared by Joanne Murray, Government Information Specialist, who may be reached by telephone to (202) 921-2541. 3 | P a g e

44. U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Legal Counsel 131 M St, N. E., Fifth Floor Washington, D. C. 20507 Free: (833) 827-2920 TTY: (202) 663-6056 FAX: (202) 827-7545 Website: www.eeoc.gov 03/18/2022 VIA: waacl13@gmail.com Michael Ayele Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties P. O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 10013 Re: FOIA No.: 820-2022-006302 Dear Mr. Ayele W: Your request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, received by the Office of Legal Counsel on 03/18/2022, is assigned to the [X] Simple [ ] Complex [ ] Expedited track with the above FOIA number. Your request will be processed by Government Information Specialist Joanne Murray who can be reached at (202) 921-2541. [X]EEOC will make every effort to issue a determination on your request on or before 04/14/2022. FOIA and EEOC regulations provide 20 working days to issue a determination on a request, not including Saturdays, Sundays and federal holidays. In unusual circumstances, EEOC may extend the 20 working days by 10 additional working days or stop processing your request until you respond to our request for fee or clarifying information. Should EEOC take an extension or stop processing your request, notice will be issued prior to the expiration of the 20 working days. [X]EEOC will make every effort to issue a determination on your request on or before 04/14/2022. FOIA and EEOC regulations, at 29 C.F.R. § 1610.9(d), provide 20 working days to issue a determination on a request, not including Saturdays, Sundays and federal holidays. As provided in 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(B) (2016), due to unusual circumstances we hereby provide you with the required written notice that we are extending by ten (10) working days the time in which we shall respond based upon: [X] the need to search for and collect the requested records, if any exist, from field offices or other establishments that are separate from this office; You may contact the FOIA Requester Service Center for status updates on your FOIA request or for FOIA information via toll free at (833) 827-2920, to our non-toll free number at (202) 921-2542, by e-mail to FOIA@eeoc.gov, by facsimile to (202) 653-6034, or by mail to our office address in the letterhead above.

45. 820-2022-006302 Additionally, if your request was filed online through the EEOC FOIA Web Portal, you may monitor its status at https://eeoc.arkcase.com/foia/portal/login. You may also contact the Acting EEOC FOIA Public Liaison, Michael L. Heise, for assistance. Sincerely, Dister Battle for _____________________________ Michael L. Heise Acting Assistant Legal Counsel foia@eeoc.gov Endnotes

46. NARA-NGC-2022-000921 has been processed with the following final disposition: No Records. March 31, 2022 Michael Ayele (aka) W P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa Ethiopia RE: Freedom of Information Act Request NGC22-392 Dear Mr. W: This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated March 18, 2022, which we received in our office on the same date via FOIAonline. We assigned your request the above internal tracking number, NGC22-392 and FOIAonline number NARA-NGC-2022-000921. In your request, you stated: What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are all records within your possession detailing: [1] the formal and/or informal ties that exist between your office, the CIA, the DOJ (FBI), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the National Archives Records Administration (NARA) and Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri); [2] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who came to the United States of America (U.S.A) in December 2009 for the purpose of pursuing his undergraduate degree; [3] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who has on and off lived in the States of California, Missouri, Maryland and the District of Columbia between December 2009 and July 2016; [4] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who has previously been to the States of New York, Virginia, Tennessee, Illinois and Ohio between December 2009 and July 2016; [5] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who’s achieved the primary goal he had set out when deciding to move to the U.S for the purpose of obtaining a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree; [6] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who has earned a B.A Degree from Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) on December 31st 2016; [7] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who had successfully completed the Economics and Political Science major he had declared with Westminster College in the month of May 2013; [8] your communications about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, as a Black man who has on and off been in contact with the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for the purpose of obtaining documents pertaining to Jeanne Ann Clery; [9] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has previously confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they’ve been in contact with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) following the death of Jeanne Ann Clery; [10] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has previously confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had assigned the case of Jeanne Ann Clery to the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A) on June 11th 1992;v [11] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that Westminster College had extended an invitation to their former-Director William Webster on August 29th 1986; [12] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that William Webster had accepted the invitation extended to him by Westminster College on October 31st 1986; [13] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that Westminster College extended their invitation to William Webster 4 (four) to 5 (five) months following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [14] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has confirmed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that William Webster accepted the invitation extended to him by Westminster College 6 (six) to 7 (seven) months following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [15] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which have implied to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that his alma mater (Westminster College) held (unofficially perhaps) a non-negligible significant interest in the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [16] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has initiated contact with the NARA following the FOIA request submitted by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that was assigned Case No.: 1511415 –000;

47. [17] your communications about the FBI as a federal agency, which has suggested for Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W to contact the NARA by referencing file numbers 100 –KC –13743 and 100 –KC –14235; [18] the communications between the FBI and NARA on the subject of file numbers 100 –KC –13743 and 100 –KC –14235;vi [19] your communications about the CIA as a federal agency, which has assigned the FOIA request submitted by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on the subject of Jeanne Clery’s death Case No.: F –2021 –01641; [20] your communications about the CIA as a federal agency, which has to this day failed to acknowledge that the FBI had reassigned the criminal investigation they had opened following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery to them on or around June 11th 1992; [21] your communications about the CIA as a federal agency, which has to this day failed to disclose the content of the investigation that was assigned to them by the FBI on or around June 11th 1992.vii NARA is the repository for documents and materials created in the course of business conducted by agencies of the Executive branch of the United States Federal government. We estimate that less than 5% of these records are designated as permanent records for legal or historical purposes. Federal agencies usually transfer their permanent records to NARA no earlier than 15 years from the date of creation, but we receive many well after 30 years from the date of creation. After conducting a search, we were unable to locate the records responsive to your request. NARA does not have any communication relating to any part of your request. This completes the processing of your FOIA request. If you are not satisfied with our action on this request, you have the right to file an administrative appeal within ninety (90) calendar days from the date of this letter via regular U.S. mail or email. By filing an appeal, you preserve your rights under FOIA and give the agency a chance to review and reconsider your request and the agency’s decision. If you submit your appeal in writing, please address it to the Deputy Archivist of the United States (ND), National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740. Both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.” If you submit your appeal by e-mail please send it to FOIA@nara.gov, also addressed to the Deputy Archivist of the United States. Please be sure to explain why you believe this response does not meet the requirements of the FOIA. All correspondence should reference your case tracking number NGC22-392. If you would like to discuss our response before filing an appeal to attempt to resolve your dispute without going through the appeals process, you may contact our FOIA Public Liaison Gary M. Stern for assistance at: National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 3110 College Park, MD 20740-6001 301-837-1750 garym.stern@nara.gov If you are unable to resolve your FOIA dispute through our FOIA Public Liaison, the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), the Federal FOIA Ombudsman’s office, offers mediation services to help resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies. The contact information for OGIS is noted below: Office of Government Information Services National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road–OGIS College Park, MD 20740-6001 ogis@nara.gov ogis.archives.gov 202-741-5770 or toll free 1-877-684-6448 Thank you for contacting the National Archives and Records Administration. Sincerely, The NGC FOIA Team Office of General Counsel National Archives and Records Administration

48. College Park, MD foia@nara.gov

49. 2/18/24, 12:58 PM Gmail - Missouri Sunshine Request --> Dispute Resolution Services Requested. Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Missouri Sunshine Request --> Dispute Resolution Services Requested. Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: "Gordon, Janet" <Janet.Gordon@dmh.mo.gov>, hrmail <hrmail@dmh.mo.gov> Cc: INFO <info@eeoc.gov>, ogis@nara.gov Bcc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:00 PM W (AACL) Date.: February 16th 2024 Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Missouri Sunshine Request --> Dispute Resolution Services Requested Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence from a little earlier, which I've since reviewed. As a Black man who has graduated with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree from Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) and who was previously employed for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH), I regret to inform you that the response you have provided to my Sunshine request further undermined public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the MODMH for various reasons. One of the reasons public confidence is undermined by your response below is because of your failure to recognize that the MODMH (FSH) and Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) have concluded an affiliation agreement, which recognized that Westminster College is indeed a postsecondary academic institution. The other reason public confidence is undermined by your response below is because of a January 30th 2018 report published by the National Council on Disability (NCD). According to that January 30th 2018 report published by the National Council on Disability (NCD), [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to college/university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their Freshmen year, [2] college/university students are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1st (first) year of post-secondary academic education; [3] 20% (twenty percent) of women were sexually assaulted in a college/university setting by the time they reached their Senior year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] 32% (thirty two percent) of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Years 2014 and 2015 in a college/university setting; [5] sexual assault “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” [6] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” [7] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” The NCD have also noted in their January 30th 2018 report that “Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity that receives federal funding. Under Title IX, discrimination on the basis of sex can include sexual harassment, rape and sexual assault. A college or university that receives federal funds may be held legally responsible when it knows about and ignores sexual harassment or assault in its programs or activities. As of September 22nd 2017, colleges can adopt various standards of proof in sexual assault cases, from the lowest standard of proof (preponderance of evidence) to a higher standard of proof (clear and convincing evidence). Title IX, like the Clery Act, also requires college employers that address sexual assault to have proper training and to train the campus community in its policies and procedures regarding sexual assault.” (See pages 29 - 30 of the January 30th 2018 report for statements made by the NCD about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972). The core issues, which the MODMH have failed to address even after concluding an affiliation agreement with Westminster College are as follows. 1) Have you had conversations about the decision of the NCD to recognize in their January 30th 2018 report that all domestic/international American undergraduate students are informed about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationship during their Freshmen year? If yes, will you promptly https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-5671138292198193514&simpl=msg-a:r-56711382921981… 1/4

50. 2/18/24, 12:58 PM disclose those records? 2) Have you had conversations about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man who was a full- time undergraduate student of Westminster College in the month of January 2010 when he was informed about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 3) Have you had conversations about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man who was in the month of January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Clery before being told about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 4) Have you had conversations about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who doesn't know if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 5) Have you had conversations about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who suspects that American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in the years following the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 6) Have you had conversations about Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who believes that the odds of Jeanne Clery being alive today (on February 16th 2024) would have significantly increased if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (beginning Calendar Year 1973 and/or 1974)? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 7) Have you had conversations about the strong likelihood of Jeanne Clery being alive today (on February 16th 2024) if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (beginning Calendar Year 1973 and/or 1974)? Gmail - Missouri Sunshine Request --> Dispute Resolution Services Requested. For the purpose of bolstering public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the MODMH, I hope you will perform a more thorough search for responsive records detailing the discussions you have had about [1] the decision of the NCD to recognize in their January 30th 2018 report that all domestic/international American undergraduate students are informed about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationship during their Freshmen year; [2] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man who was a full-time undergraduate student of Westminster College in the month of January 2010 when he was informed about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships; [3] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man who was in the month of January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Clery before being told about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships; [4] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who doesn't know if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [5] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who suspects that American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in the years following the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [6] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College who believes that the odds of Jeanne Clery being alive today (on February 16th 2024) would have significantly increased if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (beginning Calendar Year 1973 and/or 1974); [7] the strong likelihood of Jeanne Clery being alive today (on February 16th 2024) if American colleges/universities began informing their undergraduate students about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (beginning Calendar Year 1973 and/or 1974). I hope you will choose to bolster public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the MODMH particularly given [1] the affiliation agreement concluded between the MODMH and the Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri); [2] the statements made by the NCD in their January 30th 2018 report (hereby attached to this email); [3] the way Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was in the month of January 2010 informed about "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships after being told about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:00 AM Gordon, Janet <Janet.Gordon@dmh.mo.gov> wrote: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-5671138292198193514&simpl=msg-a:r-56711382921981… 2/4