110 likes | 230 Views
RANDOM MARGINAL and RANDOM REMOVAL values. E. Calvo Universidad de Valencia. SING 3 III Spain Italy Netherlands Meeting On Game Theory VII Spanish Meeting On Game Theory. (2) Random Removal. (3) Random Marginal. [ N ={ 1,…,n } ]. Start. [ S ={ 1,…,s } ]. Active set. Agreement. Y.
E N D
RANDOM MARGINAL and RANDOM REMOVAL values E. Calvo Universidad de Valencia SING 3III Spain Italy Netherlands Meeting On Game TheoryVII Spanish Meeting On Game Theory
(2) Random Removal (3) Random Marginal [ N={1,…,n} ] Start [ S={1,…,s} ] Active set Agreement Y N H&MC i leaves Breakdown RR RM i leaves [ S={1,…,s} ] Agreement Y N i leaves New active set Bargaining: (1) Hart and Mas-Colell (1996)
Monotonicity RM “optimistic” RR “pessimistic”
Characterization of RM and RR values Efficient S-utilitarian S-egalilitarian
Consistent value Maschler and Owen (1989) Shapley value (1953) Random Marginal value Hyperplane games TU-games
Solidarity value Nowak and Radzik (1994) Random Removal value TU-games
“mass” homogeneity Large market games RM value value allocation (core allocation)
“mass” homogeneity Large market games RR value Equal split allocation