10 likes | 93 Views
Supplemental Digital Content 2 – Figure 1. B’.HNsmx. Ref.C.IN.95.95IN21068.AF067155. 01_AE.02CNKM209.DQ394438. Ref.07_BC.CN.05.XJDC6441.EF368370. Ref.08_BC.CN.98.98CN006.AF286229. F. E. D. 100 80 60 40 20 0. G. 100 80 60 40 20 0. % of Permuted Trees. C. B. A. H. I. 100
E N D
Supplemental Digital Content 2 – Figure 1 B’.HNsmx Ref.C.IN.95.95IN21068.AF067155 01_AE.02CNKM209.DQ394438 Ref.07_BC.CN.05.XJDC6441.EF368370 Ref.08_BC.CN.98.98CN006.AF286229 F E D 100 80 60 40 20 0 G 100 80 60 40 20 0 % of Permuted Trees C B A H I 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Position Window: 200bp, Step: 20bp, GapStrip: On, Reps: 100, Kimura (2-parameter), T/t: 2.0, Neighbor-Joining Suppl Fig. 1. The Bootscan Analysis of HIV-1 RT Sequences of Nine Study Participants. These participants included one B’ virus Ah.79H081554 (A), three B’/CRF01_AE recombinant viruses Cq.67H081498 (B), Hen.53BH081312 (C), Fj.Xm.69H081500 (F), one CRF01_AE virus Fj.Fz.12H080847 (D), one CRF01_AE/CRF08_BC recombinant virus Fj.Fz.46H081045 (E), one CRF08_BC virus Fj.Fz.23H080912 (G), one CRF07_BC virus Xj.87H082047 (H), and one C/CRF01_AE recombinant virus Fj.Fz.112BH081488 (I).