230 likes | 507 Views
The Budget in Fairfax County. Leadership Fairfax November 21, 2013 Susan Datta Chief Financial Officer/ Director of the Dept. of Management and Budget. The Art of Budgeting. Among other things, a budget is:
E N D
The Budget in Fairfax County Leadership Fairfax November 21, 2013 Susan Datta Chief Financial Officer/ Director of the Dept. of Management and Budget
The Art of Budgeting • Among other things, a budget is: • a statement of priorities that reflects a vision of the County’s collective future • a spending guide which reflects the County’s spending priorities; • the art of juggling priorities and appropriately allocating resources; • a policy document indicating policy decisions and priorities through the allocation of funds to specific services and programs; • a communication device sharing these choices with residents; • an outline of anticipated revenues to support County services, including tax rates; and • a plan of objectives for the upcoming fiscal year.
Board of Supervisors’ Budget Priorities • Quality Educational System • Safe Streets and Neighborhoods • Clean, Sustainable Environment • Living, Caring and Affordable Communities • A Vibrant Economy • Efficient Transportation Network • Recreational and Cultural Opportunities • Taxes That Are Affordable
The Economic and Budget Situation • Four years after the Great Recession, economic growth remains tepid and uneven • A combination of projected modest revenue growth and increasing requirements for services means that the County faces projected budget shortfalls in both FY 2015 and FY 2016 • The demand for County services has also been impacted with more residents requiring assistance while options for helping are becoming more limited. • Our ongoing challenge is to develop a budget with an appropriate level of services that are affordable, sustainable and acceptable to the community. • One primary means of addressing this budget gap is through service reductions and holding down cost increases.
Challenges • Additionally the County faces several challenges ahead, including: • Slow economic recovery and its impact on the County’s budget and our residents • Congressional showdown over the federal budget deficit (sequestration) • Funding implications of State budget issues
The Economic Picture: National and Local Local Economy National Economy • Slow national recovery – federal spending cuts, tax increases, struggling labor market • Unemployment rate of 7.4% as of July 2013 • Stock market has rebounded • Uptick in the national housing market • Inflation remains in check, up 2.0% for the year. • Northern Virginia has more than regained jobs lost during the recession • Fairfax County’s July 2013 unemployment rate is 4.3% , down slightly from 4.4% in July 2012 • Housing market improving • Retail sales rising modestly - Sales Taxes in FY 2013 rose just 2.5%, the slowest in 3 years
Population Growth: Fairfax County Between 1990 and 2012, the population of Fairfax County has increased 291,100
And Remember…Virginia is a Dillon Rule State • Fairfax County operates under the urban county executive form of government, an form of Virginia county government, and like other Virginia local governments, Fairfax County has limited powers. • More specifically, Virginia courts have concluded thatlocal governments in Virginia have only: • Those powers that are specifically conferred on them by the Virginia General Assembly • Those powers that are necessarily or fairly implied from a specific grant of authority • Those powers that are essential to the purposes of government -- not simply convenient but indispensable • This doctrine of limited authority for local governments is commonly called the Dillon Rule, a name that is derived from the writings of John Forest Dillon (1831-1914), who served as a judge, a law professor and an author of legal textbooks in the latter part of the nineteenth century. It is unique to a few states in the United States. • Counties have only those powers expressly granted to them by the General Assembly • Limits locality’s flexibility to raise revenue and diversify tax base; the State limits/controls/caps about 90 percent of the County’s non-real estate tax revenue
General Fund Revenues:“Where It Comes From” – FY 2014 Adopted Budget REVENUE FROM THE COMMONWEALTH* $95,604,727 VA Public Assistance $38.6 Law Enforcement $23.7 Other $33.3 (subcategories in millions) CHARGES FOR SERVICES $72,690,493 SACC Fees $36.0 EMS Transport Fees $15.5 Clerk Fees $5.4 Other $15.8 PERMITS, FEES & REGULATORY LICENSES $36,870,254 Building Permits/ Inspection Fees $26.9 Other $10.0 2.0% 2.7% REAL ESTATE TAXES $2,207,982,016 Current $2,203.3 Delinquent $4.7 REVENUE FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT $25,676,086 Social Services Aid $25.5 Other $0.2 1.1% 0.7% LOCAL TAXES $526,607,627 Local Sales Tax $171.4 B.P.O.L. (Current) $160.7 Communications Tax $48.5 Other $146.0 62.0% 14.8% 0.4% 0.5% RECOVERED COSTS/ OTHER REVENUE $14,935,437 15.4% REVENUE FROM THE USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY $16,936,422 • * For presentation purposes, Personal Property Taxes of $211,313,944 that are reimbursed by the Commonwealth as a result of the Personal Property Tax Relief Act of 1998 are included in the Personal Property Taxes category. • ** Total County resources used to support the budget include the revenues shown here, as well as a beginning balance and transfers in from other funds. PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES * $547,381,366 Current $548.1 Delinquent ($0.7) 0.4% FINES AND FORFEITURES $14,863,219 District Court Fines $8.3 Parking Violations $3.3 Other $3.3 FY 2014 GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS** = $3,559,547,647
More on “Where It Comes From” • County’s Tax Structure is: • Over-reliant on Real Estate Taxes, which make up 62% of total General Fund revenue • Nearly 75% of Real Estate Tax revenue comes from Residential property • State limits/controls/caps nearly 90% of the County’s non-real estate tax revenue • State levies and collects all income taxes • Local city and county governments cannot levy personal income tax in the Commonwealth of Virginia
General Fund Revenue 2000- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 (prelim.) Average Projections Fiscal Year
Annual Changes in Residential Equalization: FY 2000 – FY 2016 Residential Equalization Fiscal Year • FY 2000 -- FY 2009, changes ranged from -3.38% to +23.09% • FY 2010 -- FY 2014, changes ranged from -12.55% to +3.50% • Projected increases of 2.00% in FY 2015 and FY 2016
Fairfax County’s Housing Market Residential Values are Projected to increase 2.0% in FY 2015 – FY 2016 • Some improvement to projections is expected as home prices are up 9.6% through July • Note: assessments are based on sales by neighborhood so the current mix of homes sold may not be reflective of the County’s entire residential base • The number of homes sold has increased 13.4% in 2013 from 7,987 to 9,054 through July 2013 • The most homes sold in this 7 month period since 2006 • Average number of days to sell a home was just 25 days in July reflecting the lack of homes for sale • Active listings are down nearly 25% in 2013
Annual Changes in Nonresidential Equalization: FY 2000 – FY 2016 Nonresidential Equalization Fiscal Year • FY 2000 -- FY 2009, changes ranged from -2.94% to +16.64% • FY 2010 -- FY 2014, changes ranged from -18.29% to + 8.21% • Projected increases of 1.00% in FY 2015 and FY 2016
Nonresidential Real Estate Nonresidential Values were Flat in FY 2014, Very Modest Growth Projected for FY 2015 and FY 2016 • Vacancy rates at year-end 2012 14.4%, 16.7% with sublets • Leasing Activity was at a five-year low • 114.1 million square feet of office space in the County • 2.2 million square feet under construction as of year-end 2012 • Economic uncertainty over government reductions impacts demand for office space • Businesses are reducing the amount of space they rent by consolidating space, releasing empty space previously held for future expansion • Government agencies have zero growth mandates regarding leases
General Fund Expenditures: “Where It Goes” – FY 2014 Adopted Budget (subcategories in millions) TRANSFERS $142,529,096 County Transit$34.5 Capital $12.0 Metro $11.3 Information Technology $2.9 Other $81.8 PUBLIC SAFETY $442,869,704 Police $175.5 Fire $170.9 Sheriff $44.5 E-911 $17.1 Other $34.9 PUBLIC WORKS $67,958,940 Facilities Mgt. $51.1 Other $16.9 PARKS AND LIBRARIES $50,001,226 Library $27.1 Parks $22.9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $46,375,447 Land Development Services $13.3 Planning & Zoning $9.9 Transportation $7.5 Other $15.7 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION $33,242,578 Sheriff $17.9 Circuit Court $10.5 Other $4.8 1.9% 12.3% 4.0% 1.4% 0.9% 1.3% NONDEPARTMENTAL $298,134,321 Employee Benefits $298.7 Other ($0.6) HEALTH AND WELFARE $395,234,394 Family Services $185.0 Community Services Board $109.2 Health $51.7 Neighborhood & $26.1Community Services Other $23.2 11.0% 8.3% 2.1% CENTRAL SERVICES $74,153,643 Information Technology $30.2 Tax Administration $22.6 Finance $8.4 Other $13.0 3.3% 0.8% COUNTY DEBT $118,797,992 LEGISLATIVE-EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS $27,716,001 County Executive$6.4 County Attorney $6.4 Board of Supervisors $5.2 Other $9.7 52.7% SCHOOLS $1,889,356,380 Transfer $1,717.0 Debt Service $172.4 FY 2014 GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS = $3,586,369,722 * 18 * In addition to FY 2014 revenues, available balances and transfers in are also utilized to support disbursement requirements.
Question of Sustainability • County experienced robust revenue growth from FY 2000 to FY 2010 • Home values increased, on average, 8.8% per year • Commercial values increased, on average, 9.1% per year • Median Household income increased, on average 2.3% per year • From FY 2009 to FY 2014 everything changed • Home values decreased, on average, 2.4% per year • Commercial values decreased, on average, 3.1% per year • Median Household income is projected to increase, on average 1.8% per year • In the future, modest growth is anticipated • Home values are projected to grow between 2% and 3.5% for the next several years • Commercial values are growing at 1% or less
The FY 2015 Forecast Preliminary revenue estimates project increase of less than 3% One-time balances were used in prior years Forecasted disbursement needs, based on drivers mentioned previously, are anticipated to increase at approximately 3.25% or $116.6 million So an imbalance of $32 million needs to be addressed (based on the last official forecast)
Budget Drivers Some of the major factors contributing towards the projected budget shortfalls in FY 2015 and FY 2016: Utility Costs Inflation Operations of the Silver Line Contractual obligations Contract rate increases Slow economic recovery Compensation and benefits Pay adjustments Health benefits Employer contribution for retirement benefits • Population Growth • School Enrollment Growth • School ESOL Growth • Reduced funding from the State • Federal Sequestration • Public Safety requirements • Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board (CSB): • Infant Toddler Connection (ITC) program growth • Intellectual Disabilities (ID) program growth • Safety Net programs • One-Time Balances used in FY 2014
The Disbursement Forecast Increases include: Fairfax County Public Schools $ 40.7m Pay and Benefits $ 37.4m 69 New Positions $ 9.5m All Other $ 29.0m $116.6m
How You Can Help Us With The Challenge • Today, we will discuss: • What are the important priorities for County decision-makers to keep in mind when developing the multi-year budget? You will each receive 3 “dots” to place as you choose on the Board’s designated priorities. • Ideas you have for meeting the budget challenges. You will have a discussion in your small groups and then report out to the larger group.