240 likes | 251 Views
This presentation discusses the use of charge division with microstrips for tracking, focusing on the limitations of ladder length in practical detectors. The simulation results show that network effects can reduce the longitudinal resolution, but the results apply to multi-strip sensors as well. The presentation also explores the limitations of long ladder lengths and suggests design considerations. The observed results are compared to the expected results, and the potential for wider strips or center-readout is discussed.
E N D
Tracking R&D at SCIPP: • Charge Division with Microstrips • Ladder Length Limitations 2011 Linear Collider Workshop, Granada, Espana 26-30 September 2011 Bruce Schumm SCIPP/UC Santa Cruz
But: practical detectors aren’t isolated strips. Include two nearest-neighbors in simulation: Network ef-fects lead to ~5% reduction in longitudinal resolution, but anti-correlation reduces from 60% to 40% Single-strip results also apply for multi-strip sensors, essentially unchanged.
Limitations on Ladder Length Long ladders with precise resolution is unique to the ILC. What constrains ladder length? What limitations arise for maximal lengths? Design considerations
Typical electronics characterization: e vs. capacitive load S:N ~ 16:1 ~ 1m Suggest ladder lengths > 1m easily achieved
Standard Form for Readout Noise; Lumped Element Approximation (Spieler) Series Resistance Parallel Resistance Amplifier Noise (parallel) Amplifier Noise (series) Dominant term for long ladders (grows as L3/2) Fi , Fv are signal shape parameters that can be determined from average scope traces.
Expected Noise vs. Ladder Length “Lumped element” Load Series noise expected to dominate for narrow (50 m) pitch sensors above ~25 cm long
Lumped approximation implies significant limitations due to strip resistance • How accurate is this approximation? • Test with extensible, ILC-like ladder • SiD 50 m pitch “Charge Division” Sensors • 4.75 cm strip length • 287 per strip (~ 8 m width) • 5.2 pF per strip
Sensor “Snake” Sensor “Snake”: Read out up to 13 daisy-chained 4.75 cm sensors (with LSTFE-1 ASIC) LSTFE1 chip on Readout Board Can read out from end, or from middle of chain (“center-tap”)
Naïve Expectation vs. Observation “Lumped” Load Observed
Exploring Long-Ladder Noise Results To explore/understand difference between expected and observed, a full network simulation was developed in SPICE
Comparison with Full Network Model Full network simulation
Maximal ladder length: Operating Point Efficiency 1-Occupancy 99.9% efficient 00.1% occupancy Maximal ladder length: 14.05 * 4.75cm = 67 cm Trigger Threshold
Resolution v. Readout Threshold for Maximal Ladder Length Readout Threshold
Typical electronics characterization: e vs. capacitive load Operating Point for ½ Maximal Ladder Length Trigger Threshold
Typical electronics characterization: e vs. capacitive load Resolution for ½ Maximal Ladder Length Readout Threshold
Further Reduction: “Center-Tapping” Center-Tap Observed Center-Tap Simulated NIM paper in preparation
Wrap-Up • Charge Division: • Resolution of ~6mm seems possible for 10cm ladder • Of interest in reconstructing jets at Ecm = 500 GeV • Long Ladder Readout Noise: • Strip resistance less than naively expected, but still dominant • Limits ladder length to ~70 cm for conventional readout and sensors • Think about wider, thicker strips and/or center-readout