1 / 13

WB HR Tanzania CASE STUDY Human Resource Development Project, 1997-2005

WB HR Tanzania CASE STUDY Human Resource Development Project, 1997-2005. Group 8 Phil Rose (UK), Eiad Yafi (Syria), Magdalena Belof (PL), Jiři Neuberg (CZ), Petra Nováková (CZ) Šárka Mertová (CZ) Jitka Rabitsch Adamčiková (CZ). EPDET 2011, Vilanec. Key informations :.

wanda
Download Presentation

WB HR Tanzania CASE STUDY Human Resource Development Project, 1997-2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WB HR Tanzania CASE STUDYHuman Resource Development Project, 1997-2005 Group 8 Phil Rose (UK), EiadYafi (Syria), Magdalena Belof (PL), JiřiNeuberg (CZ), Petra Nováková(CZ) ŠárkaMertová (CZ) JitkaRabitschAdamčiková (CZ) EPDET 2011, Vilanec

  2. Keyinformations: • HRDP (World Bank) • $ 24 Mio • 8 years • 4 components: • ComunityEducation Pilot • Girl’sSecondaryEducationSupport Pilot • CapacityBuilding for Schools / Community • Policy Development Planning & Resaarch

  3. 6 major eveluationquestions: • Has primary education enrolment increased in the project areas? • Was primary education quality improved in project areas? • Was girls attendance in secondary school increased as planned? • Has the project led to changes in policy planning or education systems? • Has the project led to an increase in paternal participation? 6. Could all or part of the project be scaled up or replicated elsewhere in the country?

  4. Wider Macroeconomic Evolution Inputs Activities Outputs Information Training CEF Expanded Funds for poor girls (in secondary education) Fundingallocation Experts Money Better stats. TA Support PSG Research Trained staff

  5. Wider Macroeconomic Evolution Inputs Activities Outputs S/T Outcomes M/ L Outcomes Impact Information Training CEF Expanded Parentalparticipation Raised primary enrolment • Wider education benefits: • Economic, • Health, • Etc….. Funds for poor girls (in secondary education) Improved quality in primary ed. Fundingallocation Experts Improved opportunity & quality for sec.ed.for girls Pilot mainstreamed in MOEC + then expanded Money Better stats. TA Support Stronger ed. systems, policy and planning PSG Research Trained staff

  6. Wider Macroeconomic Evolution Inputs Activities Outputs S/T Outcomes M/ L Outcomes Impact Information Training CEF Expanded Parentalparticipation Raised primary enrolment • Wider education benefits: • Economic, • Health, • Etc….. Funds for poor girls (in secondary education) Improved quality in primary ed. Fundingallocation Experts Improved opportunity & quality for sec.ed.for girls Pilot mainstreamed in MOEC + then expanded Money Better stats. TA Support Stronger ed. systems, policy and planning PSG Research Trained staff Assumptions Teachers cooperatee All other required complementary efforts to improve access & quality Trained staff will retain Elite capture Govt. policy stable Context: Other donor & Govt. programms Pilot area’scharacteristics World Bank policy & procedures

  7. 1.Has primary education enrolment increased in the project areas?

  8. 2. Was primary education quality improved in project areas?

  9. 6. Could all or part of the project be scaled up or replicated elsewhere in the country?

  10. 3. Was girls attendance in secondary school increased as planned?

  11. 4. Has the project led to changes in policy planning or education systems?

  12. 5. Has the project led to an increase in paternal participation?

  13. This shows the need…

More Related