1 / 32

Enhancing Medical Device Safety and Inclusivity: Stakeholder Meeting Insights

Delve into the implications of medical device failures, racial concerns, and the need for diversity in clinical trials. Understand the risks versus benefits, racial disparities in treatments, and the importance of post-market surveillance studies for safety. Learn from experts and regulatory insights to ensure medical products cater to all populations effectively.

warner
Download Presentation

Enhancing Medical Device Safety and Inclusivity: Stakeholder Meeting Insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stakeholder Meeting on the Implementation of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA)November 17, 2005 Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D. President National Research Center for Women & Families www.center4research.org

  2. What happens when their devices fail 10-20 years later?

  3. Guidance for Industry • FDA issued a guidance document in Sept 2005 regarding race and ethnicity data in clinical trials • FDA does not have regulations or guidance to require adequate participation levels of: • racial and ethnic groups • age groups • women and men

  4. FDA Regulations: Drugs vs. Devices • Sponsors of NDAs must present a summary of safety and effectiveness data by demographic subgroup (age, gender, race) • IND holders must submit annual reports with information about the age, gender, & race of subjects enrolled in clinical studies • There are no similar requirements for medical devices

  5. NIH Policy Could Provide a Model for MDUFMA • NIH policy requires the inclusion women & minorities in all research involving human subjects • Exception to policy • To protect the health of the human subjects • If such research is not needed

  6. The Diversity of Cosmetic Surgery Patients is Increasing Rapidly • In 2000, people of color accounted for 14% of all cosmetic-surgery procedures • In 2005, people of color accounted for 20% of all cosmetic-surgery procedures

  7. Risks vs. Benefits • Cosmetic products are being approved without any useful information on people of color • These products are not life-saving • These products are often used off-label

  8. Possible Racial Concerns • Racial/Ethnic groups respond differently to medical treatments and devices • African Americans • Implants: Keloid Scarring • Laser treatments: hypo-pigmentation • Susceptibility to autoimmune disease

  9. Keloids • Occurs after an incision • More likely for: • Blacks and African Americans • Asian Americans

  10. Pierced ear keloid Post-op keloid Keloid

  11. Granuloma

  12. Necrosis on Forehead

  13. Auto-immune Disease • African Americans are more at risk for auto-immune disease • Implanted medical devices may increase the risks of auto-immune symptoms

  14. What about Breast Implants? • 300,000+ U.S. women each year • PMAs include less than a dozen African Americans and Asian Americans • Reconstruction is popular among African American women • Augmentation is popular among Asian American women

  15. Sample Photo from Implant Maker’s Website

  16. Capsular Contracture scar tissue around implants

  17. Necrosis in 22 Yr old Woman with implants for one week

  18. Medical Devices Are Often Advertised for Non-FDA Approved Uses • Example: Sculptura

  19. Post-market Surveillance • An FDA study of all 127 premarket agreements (PMAs) approved between 1998 and 2000 found that 45 required post-approval studies. • Only 19 of the 45 legally required studies (42%) were mentioned in annual reports. • For the 11 PMAs where the results were due, final results had not been submitted in 6 (54%) cases. • That means no long-term safety information for consumers.

  20. NAS Report Finding The FDA cannot “reliably identify required post market studies that included questions related to children’s growth and development or active lifestyles.”

  21. NAS Report Recommendations • Use post-market studies as a condition of approval • FDA require longer post-market studies to take into account children’s growth and development • Require annual reports on adverse event analyses

  22. Dr. Jane HenneyFormer FDA Commissioner • “It is only through the participation of the many populations that will ultimately receive a new product that we can ensure that the medical products we approve are appropriate, safe, and effective for all Americans, and not just a narrow cut of our country’s population.”

  23. Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D. President National Research Center for Women & Families dz@center4research.org www.center4research.org

More Related