1 / 15

Protected & Collaborating Witnesses

Protected & Collaborating Witnesses. Theory of the Dislocation of Organized Crime. Investigation of Organized Crime cases can apply The theorem Falcone-Buscetta Collation and exchange of information Go from down to up in the organization’s structure. How does the dislocation work?.

warrena
Download Presentation

Protected & Collaborating Witnesses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Protected & Collaborating Witnesses

  2. Theory of the Dislocation of Organized Crime • Investigation of Organized Crime cases can apply • The theorem Falcone-Buscetta • Collation and exchange of information • Go from down to up in the organization’s structure

  3. How does the dislocation work? Organization’s Head

  4. Who Collaborates? • They are necessarily criminals or associates. • They have usually committed crimes, including violent ones • But: They are the only ones that know about the organization • Giovanni Falcone: “I would like to have Mother Theresa of Calcutta as collaborating witness” (Unfortunately she did not know anything about criminal activities)

  5. Collaborating Witness or beneficiary To belong to a Criminal Organization or to be associated to it To collaborate effectively To obtain a benefit (reduction of sentence or immunity) for information, in order to : Know Arrest Try and condemn Dislocate the organization Protection of Witnesses System use to protect witnesses threatened and intimidated by the Criminal Organization Differences

  6. Collaborating Witness • Different Cases : • Not prosecuted • Under investigation • Under trial • Sentenced to jail

  7. What are they looking for? • Immunity • No to be tried for crimes committed • Benefits for Collaboration • Obtain a lower sentence • Reduce his/her actual sentence • Protect his/her life and the life of his/her family

  8. Immunity • Problems: • In Continental Law : • Obligation of the Criminal Action • Liability of the criminal behavior • The retributive function of the sentence & the attention to victims • In Common Law : • The retributive function of the sentence & the attention to victims • Immunity must be an exception (Principle of subsidiarity)

  9. The Plea Bargain in U.S. Law • Negotiation between the Attorney Office and the defendant to obtain a plea of guilty about some crimes, in order not to be charged with other ones (subject to judicial authorization) • Reason to accept it : • to knock down the impunity • to make economy • In practice between 80% and 90% of the cases in the U.S. are applying Plea Bargain • The Criminal Justice System can work with higher standards

  10. When is the Immunity Justified? • When there is a correlation between the forgiven crimes and the information offered • In cases of violent crimes, the immunity will most probably not be granted

  11. Collaborating Witnesses • Obtaining Benefits : • A less important sentence or a reduction of sentence • The people who will be sentenced, foresee limited sentence. • Example: Sentenced to 20 years imprisonment with already 6 years spent in jail. Could go out immediately. • Problems with people not sentenced yet (Mexico) Lawyers tend to say that they can set them free

  12. Reasons for a Witness to Collaborate • Get out of prison • Reduce the sentence • Protection • To avoid criminal charges against a beloved one • They are always personal uncertain reasons to testify (Ex. Hate, resentment, revenge)

  13. Problems of the Negotiation • Trust in the person that will testify • To write a Negotiation Agreement

  14. Examination • Distinguish among: • What he/she saw could be verified (including with a polygrapher) • What he/she heard, could be the truth but might have nothing to do with the facts involved in the investigation • What he/she interpreted

  15. Remember • The witnesses know about many criminal facts • Sometimes they mix facts • It is necessary to analyze the particularities of each case • Witnesses tend to exaggerate the power of their own criminal organizations

More Related