1 / 34

Pyrite oxidation in the excavation disturbed zone of the second shaft

Pyrite oxidation in the excavation disturbed zone of the second shaft. Exchange Meeting N° 3, EIG Euridice – SCK•CEN – ONDRAF/NIRAS Mol, November 09, 2001 M. Van Geet , M. De Craen, N. Maes, and P. De Cannière. Content: two parts. Pierre De Cannière Motivation Background Maarten Van Geet

waseem
Download Presentation

Pyrite oxidation in the excavation disturbed zone of the second shaft

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pyrite oxidation in the excavation disturbed zone of the second shaft Exchange Meeting N° 3, EIG Euridice – SCK•CEN – ONDRAF/NIRAS Mol, November 09, 2001 M. Van Geet, M. De Craen, N. Maes, and P. De Cannière

  2. Content: two parts • Pierre De Cannière • Motivation • Background • Maarten Van Geet • Experimental observations • Mineralogy: SEM, EDX • Chemistry: leaching, SO42– extraction + Questions, Discussions • Futures perspectives • Recommendations: concept, architecture, PA

  3. Pyrite oxidation: why a renewal of interest for an old problem ? • Excavation Disturbed Zone (EDZ) around the second shaft • oxidation by air along open fractures • SAFIR-2: concerns on oxidation • FEP’s catalog and future prospective: • selection of relevant phenomena, and • rejection of irrelevant processes • Recent experimental concerns in the lab

  4. No oxygen can subsist at great depth in saturated porous media • Reducing conditions in marine sediments • Pyrite: FeS2 • Siderite: FeCO3 • Organic matter: OM + Fe2+ • No more oxygen below ~ 20 m under the water table • diffusion controlled • consumed by reductants (reactive transport) • Lab work: anaerobic conditions needed: gloveboxes: O2 < 1 ppm

  5. Boom Clay (B) Below the water table Marine sediment (30 Ma) Strongly reducing clay Solubility O2 in water: ~ 8 mg dm-3 O2 completely consumed in depth Backfill foreseen:no air in closed galleries Yucca Mountain (Nevada) Above the water table (300 m) Volcanic tuff (10 Ma) Oxidized silicates (SiO2) O2 in air: 21  % O2 present in fissures and matrix pores No backfill in galleries: air present in open galleries Difference Boom Clay >< Yucca

  6. Boom Clay is slightly alkaline • in situ pH: 8.2 (without loss of CO2) • in situ PCO2: 3 x 10-3 atm • pH range: 8.5 —> 9.5 (with loss of CO2) • NaHCO3: 2 x 10-2 M • Calcite: CaCO3 ± 1 % • Siderite: FeCO3 ± 1 % • presence of large Septaria nodules

  7. Boom Clay is rich in Organics • Organic material (OM): 2 – 3 % dry wt. • DOC: 200 mg / L • immobile: 99.95 % (humic-clay complex) • mobile: 0.05 % (low MW) • Humic acids (HA) ~ 70 % • Fulvic acids (FA) ~ 30 % • more than 50 % mobile OM is < 1 000 MW

  8. Boom Clay is strongly reducing • Eh < -250 mV (SHE) • slurry: -265 mV • water: -400 mV • calculations: -280 to -300 mV • Pyrite: FeS2 ± 1 % (pool of Fe2+ and S22-) • Siderite: FeCO3 • Glauconite (green color from Fe2+) • Sorbed Fe2+

  9. Pyrite could be the Eh controlling phase Eh = -0.0687 pH + 0.2613 Pyrite oxidation: 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 10 H2O —> 4 FeO(OH) + 16 H+ + 8 SO42-

  10. Ubiquitous presence of micro-dispersed Pyrite: Janus God (Custodian of the Universe in Roman Religion) • Peace Face: decreases the solubility, and increases the sorption of many radionuclides, e.g.uranium:“ Pyrite has protected and will protect the World ”(H. Ohmoto, Migration’97, Sendai) • War Face: pyrite oxidation is very detrimental for metallic canisters: the release of H2SO4 and S2O32- induces strong pitting corrosion !!!

  11. Previous Studies • Pyrite oxidation: Aging effects in Boom ClayBaeyens and Henrion (1981, 1984) • First detection of thiosulfate: Cerberus Project: 60Co gamma sources Noynaert, Beaucaire, et al. (1992)

  12. Potential oxidizers in an underground HLW repository • From air: • gaseous and dissolved O2 • Radiolysis: • peroxides + H2O2 , H-O–O•, H-O•, • Eurobitum waste: • NaNO3 • From pyrite oxidation itself: • Fe3+ • Micro-organisms • thio-oxidans, ferro-oxidans bacteria

  13. Pyrite oxidation: what it is • Initial chemical reaction • Calcite dissolution • Cation exchange • Water chemistry evolution • Eh-pH diagram

  14. Oxidation of pure pyrite only 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 10 H2O 4 FeO(OH) + 16 H+ + 8 SO42- via a metastable intermediate: S2O32– (thiosulfate) S2O32–

  15. Formation of thiosulfate (S2O32–) 4 FeS2 + 7 O2 + 6 H2O —> 4 FeO(OH) + 4 S2O32– + 8 H+ 4 S2O32– + 8 O2 + 4 H2O —> 8 SO42– + 8 H+ 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 10 H2O —> 4 FeO(OH) + 8 SO42– + 16 H+ S2O32– electrophoretic mobility higher than these of Cl–: Strong depolarizer: induce pitting corrosion of stainless steel ! Detected around the Cerberus experiment at 2 × 10-4 M

  16. Pyrite Oxidation in Boom Clay • Pyrite oxidation in itself 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 10 H2O —> 4 FeO(OH) + 8 SO42– + 16 H+ • Calcite dissolution by H+ 8 CaCO3 + 16 H+ —> 8 Ca2+ + 8 H2O + 8 CO2 • Cation exchange Ca2+ 2 Na+ 16 X —Na + 8 Ca2+ —> 8 X=Ca + 16 Na+

  17. Global reaction in Boom Clay 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 8 CaCO3 + 2 H2O + 16 X–Na4 FeO(OH)+ 8 Na2SO4 + 8 CO2 + 8 X=Ca • With the formation of alteration products: • Ferrihydrite (FeO(OH), hydrous ferric oxide) • Jarosite (KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 ) (yellow) • Gypsum (CaSO4 · 2 H2O) • Thenardite (Na2SO4), mirabilite (Na2SO4 · 10 H2O),

  18. Formation of alteration products • Ferrihydrite (FeO(OH), hydrous ferric oxide, Fe oxy-hydroxide) • Jarosite (KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 ) (yellow) • Gypsum (CaSO4 · 2 H2O) • Thenardite (Na2SO4) • Mirabilite (Na2SO4 · 10 H2O),

  19. Boom Clay Oxidation Na+ SO42– Undisturbed pH: (8.2 - 9.5) Eh: -250 to -400 mV(SHE) Slightly oxidized pH: (6 - 7) Eh: less negative thiosulphate/sulphate cation exchange Strongly oxidized pH: (3 - 4) Eh > 0 mV(SHE) calcite dissolution cation exchange Na+ Na+ HCO3– HCO3– SO42– S2O32–

  20. Strong chemical perturbations may arise from pyrite oxidation 4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 10 H2O —> 4 FeOOH + 8 SO42– + 16 H+ • Strong acidification: clay may become positively charged • cations as Ca2+, Sr2+ are no longer sorbed • anions as I– are sorbed • Iron oxy-hydroxides: strong sorbent for oxy-anions as HPO42–, H3SiO4–, SeO32–, IO3–, Organic Matter (OM) • Sulphate: may induce the co-precipitation of Sr2+, Ra2+ • Redox-sensitive elements (Se, Tc, U, Np, Pu) are mobile

  21. Detrimental effects of oxidation on • Chemistry of interstitial water (pH, Eh, Na2SO4 type) • Mineralogy: oxidation products (FeO(OH), jarosite, mirabilite) • Migration of radionuclides • Solubility and sorption of redox-sensitive elements: Se, Tc, U, Np, Pu • Sorption of non redox-sensitive elements: Ra2+, Si(OH)4 • Altered sorption of simple cations (Ca2+, Sr2+) and anions (I–) • Metallic corrosion: localized corrosion, pitting (S2O32–) • Glass corrosion: • pH: no significant impact on the solubility of silica at low pH • FeO(OH): strong sorbent for dissolved silica • Spent fuel corrosion: could be increased

  22. Detrimental effects of oxidation on • Chemistry of interstitial water (pH, Eh, Na2SO4 type) • Mineralogy: oxidation products (FeO(OH), jarosite, gypsum, thenardite, mirabilite) • Migration of radionuclides • Solubility and sorption of redox-sensitive elements: Se, Tc, U, Np, Pu • Sorption of non redox-sensitive elements: Ra2+, Si(OH)4 • Altered sorption of simple species: cations (Ca2+, Sr2+) and anions (I–)

  23. Detrimental effects of oxidation on • Metallic corrosion: localized corrosion, pitting (S2O32–) • Glass corrosion: • No significant impact on the solubility of silica at low pH • FeO(OH): strong sorbent for dissolved silica • Spent fuel corrosion: could be increased

  24. Technical Problems • Long-term good preservation of clay samples: GLP: deficient PE-Al bags • Squeezing experiments (SO42–; + anion exclusion ?) • Drilling + closure of boreholes after Ar filling • 1  % pyrite —> SO42– => as high as160 g dm-3, but 500 mg dm-3 may already disturb trace elements whose chemical behaviour is following major elements • Oxygen is our Permanent Enemy • Extra Care Continuously Needed to Protect Boom Clay against Oxidation

  25. Two Transport Mechanisms • Diffusion of dissolved oxygen in the water = reactive transport: “burning candle”= very slow process, controlled by diffusion • Direct and fast ingress of gaseous oxygen from air through fractures in EDZ around shafts and galleries could easily go faster and farther !

  26. Oxygen penetration: How ? Gaseous, or dissolved O2 ? Clay pits: gaseous O2: Yes Infiltration of shallow aerated waters ! No dissolved O2 can subsist at great depth ! No ! Faults No ! Open galleries Gaseous O2 : Yes

  27. When is oxidation relevant ? • EDZ of Galleries: Chemically Disturbed Zone (CDZ) • Need to minimize the EDZ • EDZ of boreholes and piezometers • New down-hole camera: evidences of fracturation around boreholes • New piezo at ring 116: high SO42– content • Need to inert boreholes with Ar or N2

  28. —> Concept / Architecture • Limit the exposure of Boom Clay to O2 • excavate quickly the galleries, • dispose the waste immediately and, • backfill the galleries within 2 years • Do not leave the galleries open for 20 or 50 years ! • Accessibility for retrievibility would favour oxidation !

  29. When is oxidation not relevant ? FEP’s to be rejected ! • General oxidation of the deep formation from the surface; only possible if: • dramatic erosion • no more overlying formation (no more barrier !) [cataclysm: no alleviation measurements possible] • Direct injection of oxygen bearing water through an active and open fault • scenario in Sweden and Finland for granite under ice caps: not valid for faults in porous media !

  30. Sampling strategy at the bottom of the second shaft North Starting chamber (September 2001): Sampling of oxidized pyrite as function of the distance from: • the shaft wall • the fractures

  31. Gallery Section Sampling along gallery axis Less fissured Sampling as a distance from shaft

  32. More fissured Gallery Section Sampling perpendicular to a fracture Gaseous O2 ingress O2 diffusion in water Open fracture

  33. Credits to our colleagues Persons involved: M. De Craen, N. Maes, L. Wang, H. Moors, M. Van Gompel, L. Van Ravestyn, T. Maes, F. Vandervoort, T. Beauwens, J. Mertens, W. Bastiaens, F. BernierThe Hades Team and, Everyone we should have forgotten (sorry ;-)

  34. Non conservative parameters • Determination of non conservative parameters (PCO2, pH, Eh) • What is Eh in Boom Clay (Orpheus measurements) ?

More Related