440 likes | 994 Views
导管室内的即时决策: IVUSOCTFFR 的最佳应用时机. 葛 雷 复旦大学附属中山医院 上海市心血管病研究所. 导管室内的即时决策: IVUSOCTFFR 的最佳应用时机. Clinical Indications for IVUS. Left main disease Discordance between symptoms or noninvasive test results and CAG Ambiguous lesions ISR Unsatisfactory angiographic or symptomatic results of PCI
E N D
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 葛 雷 复旦大学附属中山医院 上海市心血管病研究所
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Clinical Indications for IVUS • Left main disease • Discordance between symptoms or noninvasive test results and CAG • Ambiguous lesions • ISR • Unsatisfactory angiographic or symptomatic results of PCI • Transplant vasculopathy Ostial lesion Bifurcation Aneurysm Hazy lesion
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Angio ambiguity Plaque rupture Intracoronary thrombus NSTEMI – normal ECG NSTEMI – normal ECG
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Suggested IVUS Criteria for a ‘Significant’ Stenosis • Most authorities feel that a lumen area less than 4.0 mm2 in a proximal epicardial artery excluding Left Main and SVG lesions is a flow limiting stenosis. • Absolute lumen CSA <6.0mm2 (or MLD <3.0mm) is the suggested criterion for a significant LMCA stenosis.
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Optimal PCI results: LM Bifurcation • LCx ostium lumen area > 4.0 mm2 or plaque burden ≤ 60% indicates acceptable for one stent strategy • Iterative post-dilatation and IVUS to achieve LM MLA > 8.5 mm2 , origin LAD > 5.5 mm2 , and origin LCx >5.5mm2(2 stents) or >4.0mm2(1 stent)
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 The superior resolution of OCT compared to IVUS
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 OCT vs IVUS: Clinical Applications • Plaque characterization • Stent assessment Acute results *MLA, Ref D, Length *stent expansion *tissue prolapse *edge dissection *incomplete stent (strut) apposition Chronic results *neointima hyperplasia
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 The superior resolution of OCT compared to IVUS
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 The superior resolution of OCT compared to IVUS Dissections In-stent Restenosis Stent Malapposition
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 OCT assessment of the acute effects of stent implantation on the vessel wall Intrastent dissection Tissue prolapse Edge dissection Dissection cavity Gonzalo N, et al. Heart 2009;95:1913-9
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 FFR, When ? • When the non-invasive functional study is absent or ambiguous in stable patients with intermediate lesions • Side branch ostia when DS >70% • Multivessel disease • Questionable culprit lesions or vessels
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 M/52, Recent developed chest pain, Hyperlipidemia, Smoker Visual Estimation 85% Park SJ, AMC, 2011
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 IVUS MLA 2.8 mm2
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 No Doubt about Stenting ! Visual estimation: 85% IVUS MLA: 2.8 mm2
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Treadmill test Stage II Stage III Stage IV Stage 4 Negative
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 FFR Intravenous adenosine, 160 µg/kg/min
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Please Don’t touch ! Visual - Functional Mismatch Angiographic DS(%) : 85% IVUS MLA : 2.8 mm2 FFR : 0.84 Treadmill test : Negative What would you do ?
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 How many % of Mismatches are there in daily practice ?
FAME Study 37% FFR >0.80 1329 lesions in the FFR-guided arm 65% 20% 4% (44%) (37%) (18%) 50-70% 71-90% 91-100% Angiographic Diameter Stenosis Tonino et al., JACC 2009
46% 20% Mismatch is not uncommon Overall 31% of cases are mismatch ! 26% Reverse Mismatch In Reality at AMC 708 lesions (QCA Analysis)
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 New IVUS MLA matched with FFR <0.80 Cut-off =2.42mm2 AUC=0.800 95% CI=0.742-0.848 100 80 60 Sensitivity=90% Specificity=60% PPV=37% NPV=96% Accuracy=68% Sensitivity 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 AMC data, 2010 100-Specificity
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 New IVUS MLA matched with FFR <0.80 2.4 mm2 Kang SJ, Park SJ, Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4: 65-71
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Left Main Disease
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 29% of cases are mismatch ! Mismatch in intermediate Left Main Disease 6% 12% 23% 59% Hamilos M, Circulation 2009; 120: 1505-1512
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 9% 35% of cases are mismatch ! 26% Mismatch in Isolated intermediate LM Disease (AMC data, n=47) FFR DS % (QCA)
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 New IVUS MLA Matched with FFR <0.80 in Left Main Disease 4.5 mm2 AMC prospective cohort registry (n=47 lesions), 2011 AMC data, Preliminary
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Long Tandem Lesions
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 FFR guided Spot Stenting A B How can we select the first target lesion ?
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Treat Proximal lesion First ! Rule of Big Delta Tighter Proximal Distal Pa Pm Pd > P1 P2
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Treat Distal lesion First ! Rule of Big Delta Tighter Proximal Distal Pa Pm Pd < P1 P2
Tandem Lesions 67/F, Effort Chest pain for 2 months DM, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Smoking
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 IVUS MLA 2.6 mm2 MLA 1.9 mm2
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 FFR Intravenous adenosine (140ug/kg/min) FFR1=0.12 FFR2=0.16 < FFR2 FFR1 0.88 1.00 0.72
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Dilate Distal First ! Xience V 3.0x28
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 FFR again : 0.82 0.82 avoid unnecessary stent !
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Bifurcation PCI Side Branch FFR vs IVUS Predictors
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Side branch stenting ? Different criteria from different studies…… TIMI flow <3 Dissection > A > 50% stenosis Flow limiting dissection ≥ 75% stenosis Side branch stent (%) TIMI flow <3 Dissection > A > 70% stenosis Threatened closure TIMI flow=0 Circulation 2010 Eur Heart J 2008 Circulation 2009 Circulation 2006
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Angiographic DS (%) of SB after MB stenting can not predict functional significance (FFR<0.75). 27% 73% FFR of the Jailed side branch FFR >0.75 FFR <0.75 75% Koo BK, JACC 2005; 46: 633-7
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Summary • In stable patients with intermediate lesions,FFR guided can make decision: treat or not. • IVUS and or OCT guided can make the outcomes optimized.
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Left Main • In isolated equivocal LM lesions: FFR • In serial lesions I prefer IVUS to determine the isolated LM component • With high likelihood of PCI, I prefer IVUS
导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机导管室内的即时决策:IVUS\OCT\FFR的最佳应用时机 Never forget the patient and the clinical scenario!