80 likes | 196 Views
Peer Reviewing. Sergej Sizov. The Cycle in Which we Live…. IMPACT. Research. Existing Researchers. Publications. New Researchers. People & Money. Dissemination. Practice. Peer review: general idea. Peer review: general idea. Anonymous Independent Impartial. How it works.
E N D
Peer Reviewing Sergej Sizov
The Cycle in Which we Live… IMPACT Research Existing Researchers Publications New Researchers People & Money Dissemination Practice
Peer review: general idea • Anonymous • Independent • Impartial
How it works • Copy of the paper is sent to the co-chairs • Conference System • Email • Co-chairs send to reviewers • Reviewers point out: • Problems/weakness • Suggestions for improvements • Grade
Peer review • given: set of reviewers V = {v1,…,vk }, confidence grades res(vi ,d ) for submission d • collective result (restrictivity by thresholds t1 and t2 , tuning by weights w(vi ) ):
General idea: accurate restrictive decisions submissions 0 committee decision A R Bad A A0 AA AR E R R O R accepted papers real quality R RA RR R0 Irrelevant Junk JA JR J0 reduction tradeoff !
Conclusion • Peer reviewing is not perfect! • but it increases the probability that weakness will be identified and improve.