60 likes | 191 Views
Foundations in Comparative Effectiveness Research Symposium. The Need for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Adoption of interventions with limited evidence Chronic opioid use in non-cancer pain Proton radiation therapy for Prostate Cancer Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for angina
E N D
The Need for Comparative Effectiveness Research • Adoption of interventions with limited evidence • Chronic opioid use in non-cancer pain • Proton radiation therapy for Prostate Cancer • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for angina • Bone marrow transplant in metastatic breast cancer • Variations in care Timbie. Health Affairs, 2012
Challenges Facing Comparative Effectiveness Research • Adoption of CER evidence is variable • Economic incentives • Fee for service payment, promotional activities of makers • Method and evidence critique • Real world vs. randomized world, study endpoints • Bias of decision makers • Confirmational, pro-intervention, and pro-technology biases • Needs of decision makers not always addressed in CER • Limited use of decision support tools Timbie. Health Affairs, 2012
Symposium Agenda • Goals and Objectives of the TRI CER Component • Dr. Mick Tilford • A way forward: better decisions and better research • Dr. Tim Carey • 15 minute Break • CER Resources in Arkansas • ACHI Health Data Initiative, Kenley Money • UAMS Data Warehouse, Dr. William Hogan • LifeLink, Dr. Brad Martin • Panel Discussion – The CER enterprise in Arkansas and Beyond • Moderator: Dr. Jeff Pyne • Panelist: Drs. Tim Carey, Brad Martin, John Fortney, Mary Aitken
Meeting Notes • We want to hear from you for the panel discussion • Write questions on the supplied note card • We will collect those during the break • Please complete and return the survey • Boxes to place completed surveys at exit
Acknowledgements • Support Provided by the UAMS Translational Research Institute • #1UL1RR029884 • Speakers, Panelist, and Moderators • Wonderful staff support • Brittany Hudson