1 / 54

Part I

Part I. Project Initiation. Project Management. Chapter 2. Strategic Management and Project Selection. Problems With Multiple Projects. Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability. Project Results. 30 Percent canceled midstream

Download Presentation

Part I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Part I Project Initiation

  2. Project Management

  3. Chapter 2 Strategic Management and Project Selection

  4. Problems With Multiple Projects • Delays in one project delays others • Inefficient use of resources • Bottlenecks in resource availability

  5. Project Results • 30 Percent canceled midstream • Over half of completed projects came in up to190 percent over budget • Over half of completed projects came in up to 220 percent late

  6. Challenges • Making sure projects are closely tied to goals and strategy • How to handle the growing number of projects? • How to make these projects successful?

  7. Project Management Maturity • Project management maturity refers to the mastery of skills required to manage projects competently • Number of ways to measure • Most organizations do not do well

  8. Project Selection and Criteria of Choice • Project selection… • Evaluating • Choosing • Implementing • Same process as other business decisions

  9. Types of Companies • Companies considering projects fall into two broad categories: • Companies whose core business is completing projects • Companies whose core business is something else • They can also be broken down as: • Companies looking at projects to do for others • Companies looking at projects to do for themselves

  10. Model Criteria • Realism • Capability • Flexibility • Ease of use • Cost • Easy computerization

  11. The Nature of Project Selection Models • Models turn inputs into outputs • Managers decide on the values for the inputs and evaluate the outputs • The inputs never fully describe the situation • The outputs never fully describe the expected results • Models are tools • Managers are the decision makers

  12. Types of Project Selection Models • Nonnumeric models • Numeric models

  13. Nonnumeric Models • Models that do not return a numeric value for a project to be compared with other projects • These are really not “models” but rather justifications for projects • Just because they are not true models does not make them all “bad”

  14. Types of Nonnumeric Models • Sacred Cow • A project, often suggested by the top management, that has taken on a life of its own • Operating Necessity • A project that is required in order to protect lives or property or to keep the company in operation • Competitive Necessity • A project that is required in order to maintain the company’s position in the marketplace

  15. Types of Nonnumeric Models Continued • Product Line Extension • Often, projects to expand a product line are evaluated on how well the new product meshes with the existing product line rather than on overall benefits • Comparative Benefit • Projects are subjectively rank ordered based on their perceived benefit to the company

  16. Numeric Models • Models that return a numeric value for a project that can be easily compared with other projects • Two major categories: • Profit/profitability • Scoring

  17. Profit/Profitability Models • Models that look at costs and revenues • Payback period • Discounted cash flow (NPV) • Internal rate of return (IRR) • Profitability index • NPV and IRR are the more common methods

  18. Payback Period • The length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project • A shorter payback period is better

  19. Payback Period Example

  20. Payback Period Drawbacks • Does not consider time value of money • More difficult to use when cash flows change over time • Less meaningful for longer periods of time (due to time value of money)

  21. Discounted Cash Flow • The value of a stream of cash inflows and outflows in today’s dollars • Also know as discounted cash flow or just discounting • Widely used to evaluate projects • Includes the time value of money • Includes all inflows and outflows, not just the ones through payback point

  22. Discounted Cash Flow Continued • Requires a percentage to use to reduce future cash flows • This is known as the discount rate • The discount rate may also be known as a hurdle rate or cutoff rate • There will usually be one overall discount rate for the company

  23. NPV Formula

  24. NPV Formula Terms A0 Initial cash investment Ft Cash flow in time period t (negative for outflows) k The discount rate t The number of years of life • A higher NPV is better • Higher the discount rate lower the NPV

  25. NPV Example

  26. Internal Rate of Return [IRR] • The discount rate (k) that causes the NPV to be equal to zero • The higher the IRR, the better • While it is technically possible for a series to have multiple IRR’s, this is not a practical issue • Finding the IRR requires a financial calculator or computer • In Excel “=IRR(Series,Guess)”

  27. Profitability Index • a k a Benefit cost ratio • NPV divided by initial cash investment • Ratios greater than 1.0 are good

  28. Advantages of Profitability Models • Easy to use and understand • Based on accounting data and forecasts • Familiar and well understood • Gives a go/no-go indication • Can be modified to include risk

  29. Disadvantages of Profitability Models • Ignore nonmonetary factors • Some ignore time-value of money • Biased toward the short-term • Payback ignores cash flow after payback • IRR can have multiple solutions • All are sensitive to errors • Nonlinear • Dependent on determination of cash flows

  30. Scoring Models • Unweighted 0–1 factor model • Unweighted factor model • Weighted factor model

  31. Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model • Factors selected • Listed on a preprinted form • Raters score the project on each factor • Each project gets a total score • Main advantage is that the model uses multiple criteria • Major disadvantages are that it assumes all criteria are of equal importance

  32. Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model Example Figure 2-2

  33. Unweighted Factor Scoring Model • Replaces X’s with factor score • Typically a 1-5 scale • Column of scores is summed • Projects with high scores are selected

  34. Unweighted Weighted Factor Model • Each factor is weighted the same • Less important factors are weighted the same as important ones • Easy to compute • Just total or average the scores

  35. Weighted Factor Model • Each factor is weighted relative to its importance • Weighting allows important factors to stand out • A good way to include nonnumeric data in the analysis • Factors need to sum to one • All weights must be set up, so higher values mean more desirable • Small differences in totals are not meaningful

  36. Weighted Factor Model Example Figure B Page 60

  37. Advantages of Scoring Models • Allow multiple criteria • Structurally simple • Direct reflection of managerial policy • Easily altered • Allow for more important factors • Allow easy sensitivity analysis

  38. Disadvantages of Scoring Models • Relative measure • Linear in form • Can have large number of criteria • Unweighted models assume equal importance

  39. Risk Considerations in Project Selection • Both costs and benefits are uncertain • Benefits are more uncertain • There are many ways of dealing with risk • Can make estimates about the probability of outcomes • Subjective probabilities • Uncertainty about: • Timing • What will be accomplished? • Side effects • Pro forma documents

  40. The Project Portfolio Process (PPP) • Links projects directly to the goals and strategy of the organization • Means for monitoring and controlling projects

  41. Symptoms of a Misaligned Portfolio • More projects • Inconsistent determination of benefits • Projects that don’t contribute to the strategy • Competing projects • Costs exceed benefits • No risk analysis of projects • Lack of tracking against the plan • No client for project

  42. Purpose of Project Portfolio Process • Identify nonprojects • Prioritize list of projects • Limit number of projects • Identify the real options for each project • Identify projects with good fit • Identify co-dependent projects

  43. Purpose of Project Portfolio Process Continued • Eliminate risky projects • Eliminate projects that skip the formal selection process • Keep from overloading the organization • To balance the resources with needs • To balance returns • To balance short-, medium-, and long-term returns

  44. Project Portfolio Process Steps • Establish a project council • Identify project categories and criteria • Collect project data • Assess resource availability • Reduce the project and criteria set • Prioritize the projects within categories • Select the projects to be funded and held in reserve • Implement the process

  45. Step 1: Establish a Project Council • Senior management • The project managers of major projects • The head of the Project Management Office • Particularly relevant general managers • Those who can identify key opportunities and risks facing the organization • Anyone who can derail the PPP later on

  46. Step 2: Identify Project Categories and Criteria • Derivate projects • Platform projects • Breakthrough projects • R&D projects

  47. Step 3: Collect Project Data • Assemble the data • Document assumptions • Screen out weaker projects • The fewer projects that need to be compared and analyzed, the easier the work of the council

  48. Step 4: Assess Resource Availability • Assess both internal and external resources • Assess labor conservatively • Timing is particularly important

  49. Organization’s goals Have competence Market for offering How risky the project is Potential partner Right resources Good fit Use strengths Synergistic Dominated by another Has slipped in desirability Step 5: Reduce the Project and Criteria Set

  50. Step 6: Prioritize the Projects Within Categories • Apply the scores and criterion weights • Consider in terms of benefits first and resource costs second • Summarize the returns from the projects

More Related