160 likes | 359 Views
2. 2. Hearing Structure. Implementation Workgroup Chairs:Judy MurphyLiz JohnsonPaul Egerman Co Chair Adoption Certification WorkgroupMarc Probst Co Chair Adoption Certification WorkgroupMembers of Adoption Certification Workgroup who participated in hearing:Rick Chapman - Kindred Healthca
E N D
1. HIT Policy Committee Adoption Certification Workgroup
Summary of Findings from the Implementation Workgroup hearing on January 10/11, 2011
Paul Egerman, Chair
Marc Probst, Co-Chair
February 2, 2011
2. 2 Hearing Structure Implementation Workgroup Chairs:
Judy Murphy
Liz Johnson
Paul Egerman – Co Chair Adoption Certification Workgroup
Marc Probst – Co Chair Adoption Certification Workgroup
Members of Adoption Certification Workgroup who participated in hearing:
Rick Chapman - Kindred Healthcare
Larry Wolf – Kindred Healthcare
Joseph Heyman - American Medical Association
3. Brief History 3 Adoption Certification planned to assess Meaningful Use efforts, challenges and learnings
Implementation Workgroup formed within Standards Committee with similar focus
ONC asked Adoption Certification Workgroup to combine efforts on hearing in January 2011
4. Real World Experiences - MU Hearing Panels Implementation Support – Regional Extension Centers (Monday, Jan 10th)
Implementation Support – EHR Certification (Monday, Jan 10th)
Implementation Support – Health Information Exchange (Tuesday, Jan 11th)
Early Adopters Seeking Attestation - Eligible Providers Experience (Tuesday, Jan 11th)
Early Adopters Seeking Attestation – Eligible Hospitals (Tuesday, Jan 11th)
4
5. Panelist Questions Identify your challenges, barriers, and successes.
Outline the implementation approaches and methodologies you used that worked and didn’t work. Include any real-world user stories, illustrations, or examples.
Discuss your outcomes/results. Include any surprises or unexpected outcomes and how you addressed them?
Describe your experience using the ONC and CMS communications regarding the meaningful use criteria, standards specifications and measurement. 5
6. 6 MU Experience Hearing- Presenters Panel 1: Implementation Support – Regional Extension Centers
Mat Kendall, Office of the National Coordinator
Paul Kleeberg, MD, Clinical Director, MN/ND Regional Extension Assistance Center
Dan Nelson, Desert Ridge Family Practice, Phoenix, AZ
Lisa Levine, MPH, Vice President-Operations, Family Health Center of Worcester, MA
Clayton Gillett, Executive Director, O-HITEC, Oregon’s Regional Extension Center
Panel 2: Implementation Support—EHR Certification
Carol Bean, Office of the National Coordinator
Alisa Ray, Executive Director, CCHIT
Patricia Daiker, RN, Vice President, Medhost
John Travis, Senior Director – Regulatory Compliance, Cerner
Brad Melis, Founder and Executive Vice President, ChartLogic
7. 7 MU Experience Hearing- Presenters Panel 3: Implementation Support – Health Information Exchange
Claudia Williams, State HIE, Office of the National Coordinator
Linda Reed, CIO, Atlantic Health & Board Member, NJ Health Connect
James A. Fuzy, President & CEO, Mississippi Health Partners
Reid W. Coleman, MD, Lifespan, RI
Panel 4A: Early Adopters of Meaningful Use Seeking Attestation – Eligible Providers’ Experience, Part 1
Careen Whitley, MD, Hill Physicians Group, San Francisco, CA
Lyle Berkowitz, MD, Northwestern, IL
Robert Murry, PhD, MD, Hunterdon Healthcare, NJ
Scott Hammer, MD, Southern Delaware Medical Group
Josh Seidman, ONC – Reactor
8. 8 MU Experience Hearing- Presenters Panel 4B: Early Adopters of Meaningful Use Seeking Attestation – Eligible Providers’ Experience, Part 2
Scott Monteith, MD, Michigan State University & Private Practice
Willa Drummond, MD, Professor, University of Florida
Richard Sadja, CFO, Family Practice, Glendale, CA
Harm Scherpbier, MD, CMIO, Main Line Health, PA
Robert Anthony, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid - Reactor
Panel 5A: Early Adopters of Meaningful Use Seeking Attestation – Hospital Experience, Part 1
Joanne Sunquist, RN, CIO, Hennepin CO Medical Center, MN
Nancy Vogt, Deputy Chief Compliance Officer, Aurora Health Care, WI
Chuck Christian, CIO, Good Samaritan Hosp, IN
Denni McColm, CIO, Citizen’s Memorial Hospital, MO
Robert Anthony, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid - Reactor
9. 9 MU Experience Hearing- Presenters Panel 5B: Early Adopters of Meaningful Use Seeking Attestation – Hospital Experience, Part 2
Brian Jacobs, MD, VP & CMIO, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington DC
Russ Branzell, CIO, Poudre Valley Regional Medical Center, CO
Joel C. Berman, MD, CMIO, & Josie Bendiks, CIS Director, Concord Hospital, NH
Len Bowes, MD, Intermountain Health, UT
Robert Anthony, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid - Reactor
10. 10 Summary of Hearing – Meaningful Use The ONC efforts toward Meaningful Use have raised awareness to the benefits of EHR
Medical malpractice insurance costs rising due to MU (separate hearing?)
More clarity in Meaningful Use definition
Using the system meaningfully versus achieving Meaningful Use (focus more on outcomes)
Need for clear path with end goal stated and flexibility allowed to get there
11. 11 Summary of Hearing – Meaningful Use (continued) Seeking MU has derailed organization's HIT strategic plan - and not necessarily in a way that improves quality and efficiency of patient care
Functionality does not equate to usability
Quality Measures are a sore point
TIME – keep the bar high, but be more realistic in the timeframes to achieve
12. 12 Summary of Hearing – Certification Certification seems to be working well
Communications: concern with CMS' responsiveness to questions and the completeness of their FAQ pages
Choreography with the other agencies: Concern about the "moving target" status of certification tests
Failure of certification to reflect how software is developed
Concern that some vendors being certified for Stage 1 will not be capable of meeting stages 2 and 3
13. 13 Summary of Hearing – REC/HIE REC is not consistent, but several comments on positive value of REC
Various questions around the viability of HIE
Concern by REC’s of having favored vendor lists
14. 14 Summary of Hearing – General Layering on of various federal requirements
“A bad standard is better than 3 standards”
Confusion about rules of the road
Several workforce worries
15. Top Ten Recommendations (adaption from HITSC) Provide adequate time.
Keep it simple. Don’t let “perfect be the enemy of “good enough.”
Keep the implementation cost as low as possible.
Design for the little guy.
Pick a standard(s) soon.
Address workforce issues.
Increase focus on “usability”.
Improve choreography between federal agencies impacting HIT.
Create a crosswalk between MU and certification requirements.
Provide adequate time (purposely listed again). 15
16. Next Steps Continue working with the HITSC Implementation Workgroup Chairs
How to continue influence MU Workgroup efforts
Hearing in late spring on legal considerations of MU and EHR 16