1 / 22

API Report API-AGA Joint Committee 2010 API ECS Winter Conference New Orleans, LA

API Report API-AGA Joint Committee 2010 API ECS Winter Conference New Orleans, LA. Ed Baniak Senior Standards Associate Washington, DC January 28, 2010. API Standards Development Process. API is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

whitley
Download Presentation

API Report API-AGA Joint Committee 2010 API ECS Winter Conference New Orleans, LA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. API Report API-AGA Joint Committee2010 API ECS Winter ConferenceNew Orleans, LA Ed Baniak Senior Standards AssociateWashington, DC January 28, 2010

  2. API Standards Development Process • API is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • Regular API Standards program audits (conducted by ANSI) • Open and transparent process (anyone can comment on any document) • All comments and objections must be considered

  3. Standards Development Process • Developed by consensus (does not mean unanimity) • Committee balance between users, manufacturers and contractors/consultants • Standards developed using ANSI approved API Standards Development Procedures (available on-line at www.api.org) • API corporate membership is not a requirement for participation on API standardization committees

  4. Standards Development Process • Standards group has oversight for ensuring conformance with the applicable procedures, facilitating meetings, and assisting in resolution of comments/conflicts • Open Process - Seek representation from all interest groups: member companies, other trade organizations, government, consultants, etc.

  5. API Also Provides Support to the International Standards Community • API is involved in international standardization via ANSI • Secretariat for two main industry committees, TC 28 and TC 67 • Secretariat for US Technical Advisory Groups for both Technical Committees

  6. API Standards Committee Operations • API Standards Committees usually meet twice a year: • Oversight Committees (ECS, COPM, CRE) meet to monitor work program • Subgroups (task forces, resource groups) meet as needed to progress work, often in conference calls or web meetings • All standards balloting is done via the web API-AGA Joint Committee usually meets once a year: • 8 Subcommittees meet at the plenary meeting and additional meetings as needed • Ballots handled through the web site

  7. Other Related API Documents 2009 • Changes to Spec 6D, Pipeline Valves, 23rd Edition - Section 10 – Quality Control – Published as part of Addendum 1, Annex G, October 2009 (Effective April 2010) • Addition to Spec 6D,Pipeline Valves, 23rd Edition - Processes Requiring Validation – Published as part of Addendum 1, Annex G, October 2009 (Effective April 2010) • Addition to Spec 6D, Pipeline Valves, 23rd Edition - New Annex on Heat Treatment – Published as Addendum 1, Annex H, October 2009 (Effective April 2010) • National Adoption of ISO 14723:2009 as next Revision of Spec 6DSS Subsea Pipeline Valves – 2nd Edition, December 2009 (Effective June 2010) • API Spec 6D, Pipeline Valves, Errata 3 (includes Errata 1 & 2), issued February 2009

  8. Other Related API Documents 2009 • Recommended Practice 5L1, Recommended Practice for Railroad Transportation of Line Pipe, 7th Edition • Recommended Practice 5LW, Recommended Practice for Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges and Marine Vessels, 1st Edition • Specification 5LD, Specification for CRA Clad or Lined Steel Pipe, 3rd Edition • Recommended Practice 5A3/ISO 13678, Recommended Practice on Thread Compounds for Casing, Tubing, LIne Pipe, and Drill Stem Elements, 3rd Edition • Specification 5DP/ISO 11961, Specification for Drill Pipe, 3rd Edition

  9. 2010 Primary Voting Year for 1104 • In 2009, reported that the document is approaching the limit of its 5-year review cycle • Committee was informed to begin the review/update process • During 2009, collecting suggestions for review • Several INGAA workshops addressing document concerns

  10. Subcommittee Work Groups • Work on proposed changes – Ongoing • Solicit input from all interested parties (other organizations, DOT-PHMSA, colleagues, etc. • Subcommittee should review their sections internally and agree on changes. • Subcommittee chairs should submit the final changes document to API for ballot • Balloting process: • One fully revised document • Individual sections • Subcommittee chairs coordinate the resolution of comments after ballot

  11. Standards Development Timeline • Formation of workgroup and definition of scope • Work on document (complete by April 15) • Required Ballot for Consensus (complete by June 1) • Comment Resolution from Ballot (2-? weeks) • Subcommittees meet during the summer standards conference to resolve comments • Second ballot(s) based on Technical Comments (3 weeks) • Typesetting and initial proof (4 weeks) • Publication by December 2010 • Start Over Again in 5 Years

  12. 1104 Voting Due to the internal structure of the API-AGA committee (and supported by separate by-laws) voting is handled differently for the committee than other committees. To ensure a balance, voting is divided evenly over 7 Voting Categories There are 4 assigned votes per category

  13. 1104 Voting There are 28 votes allowed per ballot Consensus: 15 total votes (>50% of eligible votes) must be cast (affirmative, negative, abstain) 2/3 of the affirmative/negative votes must be affirmative Negative votes: Attempt to resolve with the voter. However, if consensus rules are satisfied, the publication can proceed.

  14. Review the Voting Roster 7 Voting Segments: American Petroleum Institute ─ Pipeline Segment American Gas Association Pipeline Contractors Association Pipe Manufacturers American Society for Nondestructive Testing American Welding Society General Interest

  15. American Petroleum Institute ─ Pipeline Segment Jim Ibarra BP Donald Drake ExxonMobil Tim Burns Shell International (vacant)

  16. American Gas Association • Marshall Farley Consumers Energy Co. • Alan Holk El Paso Corporation • Perry Sheth KeySpan Energy • Joseph Sieve Washington Gas Company

  17. Pipeline Contractors Association • Brian Laing CRC Evans Welding Services • Bill Marhofer Pipeline Machinery Int’l • Don Thorn Welded Construction LP • Ronnie Wise Price Gregory Construction

  18. Pipe Manufacturers • Alex Afaganis EVRAZ, Inc. • Bruce Reichart Tenaris Coiled Tubes • Samar Saha USS Technical Center • Robert Wise Moody International

  19. American Society for Nondestructive Testing • David Culbertson El Paso Corporation • Scott Metzger Moody International • Tom Reeder Central NDT Inc. • Chuck Woodruff SeaOne Maritime Corporation

  20. American Welding Society • Alan Beckett Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. • William Bruce CC Technologies • Robert Gatlin Global Industries • Pamela Michalski Dominion East Ohio

  21. General Interest • Bob Huntley RHM Welding Consulting • Wayne Klemcke Universal Ensco, Inc. • Donald Stevens DM Stevens and Associates • Yong-yi Wang Center for Reliable Energy Sys

  22. 1104 Update • Thank you! • Ed BaniakAmerican Petroleum Institute1220 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005baniake@api.org • 202-682-8135 • http://mycommittees.api.org/www.api.org

More Related