1 / 37

Global Health Challenges Social Analysis 76: Lecture 12

Global Health Challenges Social Analysis 76: Lecture 12. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign. Epidemic and Endemic.

wilbur
Download Presentation

Global Health Challenges Social Analysis 76: Lecture 12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Global Health ChallengesSocial Analysis 76: Lecture 12 Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  2. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  3. Epidemic and Endemic Epidemic -- from Greek epi- upon + demos people, is a disease for which the incidence of new cases in a given human population, during a given period, substantially exceeds what is "expected", based on recent experience. Some historically important epidemic diseases – yellow fever, plague, smallpox, cholera, influenza Endemic – a disease is maintained in a population without the introduction of cases from outside the population. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  4. Control and Elimination Control: Reduction of disease incidence, prevalence, morbidity or mortality to a locally acceptable level as a result of deliberate efforts. Continued intervention measures are required to maintain the reduction. Elimination of disease: Reduction to zero of the incidence of a specified disease in a defined geographical area as a result of deliberate efforts. Continued intervention measures are required. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  5. Elimination and Eradication Elimination of infection: Reduction to zero of the incidence of infection caused by a specified agent in a defined geographical area as a result of deliberate efforts. Continued measures to prevent re-establishment of transmission are required. Eradication: Permanent reduction to zero of the worldwide incidence of infection caused by a specific agent as a result of deliberate efforts. Intervention measures are no longer needed. Herd Immunity: when vaccination of a large fraction of a population provides protection to un-vaccinated individuals through decreased disease transmission. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  6. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  7. Epidemic Disease Surveillance A key aspect for managing epidemics it to quickly identify a disease outbreak and track trends. All Ministries of Health have a system of notifiable cases of certain disease based on the detection of cases in health facilities. Cases are reported sometimes by paper forms and more recently electronically in selected countries to the central Ministry of Health. Case definitions are based on both clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory criteria for confirmed cases. Ministries of Health report cases to the World Health Organization, weekly, monthly or annually depending on the disease and epidemic. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  8. Limitations of Disease Surveillance Systems Facility based data collection only captures a small fraction of cases in the population for most diseases. Poor and excluded groups much less likely to be captured. Weak laboratory systems in many developing countries for confirmation. Speed of transmittal of information from the periphery to the center. Political and economic reasons to suppress information on disease outbreaks. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  9. WHO and Epidemic Surveillance and Response International Health Regulations give WHO legal authority to undertake a number of actions related to epidemics including issuing travel bans and other restrictions. Ministries of Health report notifiable cases to the WHO but these are often highly incomplete and politicized – e.g. impact of cholera on tourism, China reluctance to report SARS. To supplement poor reporting, WHO scans local media sources and also receives internet submissions about potential outbreaks. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  10. Epidemic Response Once a potential outbreak has been identified, national health authorities and WHO with the support of agencies like CDC can respond. Investigation of the source and identification of the agent with laboratory confirmation. Quarantine including travel bans – Canada, China in the case of SARS. Specific responses depending on the agent. In the era of SARS, Avian flu and bioterrorist threats, much greater political and business interest in surveillance and response. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  11. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  12. Influenza Virus Composition Type of nuclear material Neuraminidase Hemagglutinin A/Beijing/32/92 (H3N2) Virus type Geographic origin Strain number Year of Isolation Virus subtype Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  13. Influenza Antigenic Changes Structure of hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) periodically change: Drift: Minor change, same subtype • In 1997, A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2) virus was dominant • A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2) appeared in late 1997 and became the dominant virus in 1998 • Shift: Major change, new subtype • H2N2 circulated in 1957-67 • H3N2 appeared in 1968 and replaced H2N2 • Pandemic potential Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  14. Timeline of Emergence of Influenza A Viruses in Humans Avian Influenza H9 H7 Russian Influenza H5 H5 H1 Asian Influenza H3 Spanish Influenza H2 Hong Kong Influenza H1 1918 1957 1968 1977 1997 2003 1998/9 Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  15. 20th Century Influenza Pandemics 1918-20 – huge mortality concentrated in adult age-groups, mortality ranged from 0.2% of the population in Denmark to 8% in Central Province, India. 1957-58 – much lower mortality 1968-1970 – similar to 1957-58 Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  16. Distributions of median deaths forecasted by a replay of the 1918-20 pandemic in the year 2004 by region and age-group 62.1 Million Global Deaths Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  17. Intervention Options • Develop and distribute vaccine • Antivirals for prevention and treatment --zanamivir and oseltamivir phosphate • Antibiotics for secondary bacterial pneumonia • Supportive medical care • Travel bans, quarantine • Pneumocccal, HiB vaccination? Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  18. Pandemic Vaccine • Annual vaccine is trivalent (3 strains), pandemic vaccine will be monovalent. • Production using current technologies would likely take 4-5 months  may not be available before 1st pandemic wave • There will be vaccine shortages initially • 2 doses may be necessary to ensure immunity Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  19. Developing Country Response? Low probability that in setting of a major influenza pandemic vaccine would reach low-income or even middle-income populations. 92% of the likely mortality would be in the developing world. What intervention strategies can be used in these resource poor environments? Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  20. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  21. Criteria for Eradicability Biological and Technical feasibility – -an effective intervention to interrupt transmission of the agent; - diagnostic tools with sufficient sensitivity and specificity; and - humans are essential for the life cycle of the agent which has no other vertebrate reservoir and does not amplify in the environment. Costs and Benefits – the cost of eradication is warranted by the benefits Societal and Political Support Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  22. Disease Eradication Efforts • Yellow Fever -- launched 1915, mosquito control, failed • Yaws – launched 1955, long-acting penicillin, failed • Malaria – launched circa 1955, DDT, failed • Smallpox – launched 1967, vaccine, last case 1977 • Dracunculiasis (Guinea Worm) – launched 1988, water access interventions, on-going • Polio – launched 1988, vaccine, ongoing Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  23. Smallpox Caused by a virus transmitted from person to person by respiratory transmission. 10-12 day period of incubation. Fever, aching pains, 2-4 days into illness, rash over face that spreads to rest of body, lesions become pustular. One of causes of major human epidemics. In 1796, Jenner figured out that pustular material from a cowpox lesion (vaccinia virus) would provide protection from smallpox. Commercial production of heat stable freeze-dried vaccine based on the vaccinia virus became available after WWII. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  24. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  25. Smallpox Eradication WHO resolution calling for smallpox eradication around 1959 with little progress over the next 8 years. January 1967 intensified smallpox eradication program launched, at the time estimated 10-15 million cases a year in 44 countries. Major effort with key role played by WHO and US Centers for Disease Control. Last case, Somalia, in 1977. World declared smallpox free in 1980. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  26. Why Did Smallpox Eradication Work? Humans only reservoir for the virus. Short period of infectivity 3-4 weeks after onset of skin lesions. Clustered outbreaks due to mechanism of transmission. Vaccine highly effective with long duration effect. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  27. Lessons Learned from Smallpox Eradication • Smallpox eradication had a very small budget for donor assistance – it had to work primarily using existing health system staff. • Operational research on all aspects of control was used to tailor the program strategy to local epidemiological, social and health system conditions. • Surveillance including independent monitoring of the effectiveness of vaccination teams. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  28. Guinea Worm Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  29. Definitions Epidemic Surveillance and Response Pandemic Influenza Disease Eradication Polio Eradication Campaign Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  30. Polio Polio virus transmitted through faecal-oral transmission. Most cases are asymptomatic. 1/200 develop acute flaccid paralysis. 1955- Salk et al developed inactivated polio virus vaccine (IPV) 1961 – Sabin developed live attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  31. Polio Control With improved sanitation and widespread use of IPV in high-income countries, incidence fell dramatically. Cuba eliminated polio in the 1960s through mass campaigns using OPV. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) initiated elimination campaign for the Americas in 1985. Global eradication campaign launched in 1988. Rotary International adopted the campaign and has raised well over $500 million, other donors have contributed more than $3 billion. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  32. Polio Eradication Strategy Mass vaccination through National Immunization Days. In poor sanitation environments, each child may need up to 8 doses for permanent immunity. Huge resources (more than US$4 billion?), 20 million plus volunteers, 30% of WHO staff devoted to eradication effort. Steady progress until 2000. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  33. Setbacks Hispanola outbreak in 1999 found to be due to vaccine derived poliovirus. OPV can mutate back to cause paralysis and can be transmitted human to human. Outbreaks proven with genetic fingerprinting in Egypt, Madagascar, and the Philippines. Post 9/11 not clear countries will be willing to stop immunization even after eradication because of bioterrorist threats. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  34. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  35. Rumors and Cessation of Vaccination in Kano State, Nigeria Persistent rumors in Muslim communities that polio vaccine was contaminated with HIV and/or would lead the children immunized to be sterile. Kano State, Nigeria stopped vaccination from Jan 1 2004 to September 2004. Outbreak of cases has lead to spread to multiple countries outside of Nigeria. Locus of transmission in Muslim communities in Uttar Pradesh has also led to transmission to other parts of India and other countries. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  36. Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

  37. Should the Goal of Eradication be Changed to Elimination or Control? Ongoing cost to poor countries in terms of dollars and staff time is high? Unclear prospect that wild poliovirus transmission can be interrupted given Muslim suspicions in certain countries. OPV paradox – OPV is oral and cheap but OPV has a clear risk of causing vaccine derived outbreaks. Should we switch to control as the goal? If so, how to make this difficult decision? Harvard University Initiative for Global Health

More Related