240 likes | 352 Views
Is conflict directed backjumping a waste of time?. CP 1996. AR 33 Barbara M Smith (up to 2001). Chen & van Beek 2001. Chen & van Beek. Random problems, no structure. cbj a waste of time. Chen & van Beek. Chen & van Beek. Chen & van Beek. 10 cases where GAC beat GAC-CBJ.
E N D
AR 33 Barbara M Smith (up to 2001)
Chen & van Beek Random problems, no structure cbj a waste of time
Chen & van Beek 10 cases where GAC beat GAC-CBJ When cbj gets beaten it gets beaten by a very small amount i.e. cbj has a small overhead
Chen & van Beek When cbj wins it can win by a HUGE margin cbj is robust
Chen & van Beek The bottom line
Bayardo & Schrag SAT: relsat(i) uses cbj + relevance bounded learning, retaining conflict sets of size ≤ i as clauses,