250 likes | 368 Views
Carbon Markets and Biochar: An Offset Buyers Perspective North American Biochar Conference August 10th, 2009. Peter Weisberg Offset Project Analyst pweisberg@climatetrust.org 503-238-1915. Outline. Theory of offsets How offsets could support biochar projects
E N D
Carbon Markets and Biochar: An Offset Buyers Perspective North American Biochar Conference August 10th, 2009 Peter Weisberg Offset Project Analyst pweisberg@climatetrust.org 503-238-1915
Outline • Theory of offsets • How offsets could support biochar projects • Current funding from The Climate Trust
Source: The McKinsey Quarterly. 2007. “A cost curve for greenhouse gas reductions.”
Sequestration and Carbon Markets • Very little sequestration thus far: • No soils • Only reforestation/afforestation with temporary credits
US Offset Market • Trends • Fossil fuels will likely be capped • Favor domestic projects over international projects • Destroying methane emissions • Dairy digesters • Landfill gas capture • Wastewater treatment plants • Coal mine methane • Sequestration • Forestry • Afforestation/Reforestation • Improved Forest Management • Avoided Conversion/Deforestation • Soil Management • Biochar?
Outline • Theory of offsets • How offsets could support biochar projects • Current funding from The Climate Trust
$ = CO2 Sequestered x Price • Low Quality US Projects • Chicago Climate Exchange: $2-$4 • High Quality US Projects • Voluntary Carbon Standard: $4-$9 • California Climate Action Registry: $5-$11 • Mature International Markets • EU Emissions Trading Scheme: $10-$40 • Projections for Early US Market • Markey-Waxman Bill : $10-$15
Currently Available Methodologies • Avoidance of methane production from biomass decay through controlled pyrolysis • Small scale • No credit for carbon sequestration • Char must be “biologically inert” • Volatile C/Fixed C ratio lower than 50%
Next Step: Sequestered Carbon Carbon Gold methodology for proposed to the Voluntary Carbon Standard
Unresolved Methodology Issues • Recalcitrance • Guarantee 100 years of permanent sequestration • Carbon Gold: Volatile C/Fixed C ratio lower than 50% • Erosion • What happens to char that erodes out of the soils?
Unresolved Methodology Issues • Ownership – Three entities with valid ownership claims • Feedstock owner • Pyrolysis plant • Soil owner/Farmer using char • Can only be claimed once
Unresolved Methodology Issues • No environmental harm • Heavy metals • Criteria air pollutants • Microbe health
Unresolved Methodology Issues • Environmental impact • Heavy metals • Criteria air pollutants • Microbe health • Carbon already in soil
Resolved Issue: Waste Feedstocks • Leakage • Changes in emissions outside the project itself • Direct: Biomass fuel unavailable • Indirect: displace current farm land for biochar feedstock plantations land use change • Carbon Gold: “biomass that would otherwise have been left to decay or been burned in an uncontrolled manner”
Outline • Theory of offsets • How offsets could support biochar projects • Current funding from The Climate Trust
3 Programs • Oregon Program • Smart Energy • Colorado Carbon Fund • 16 projects, $8.8 million in funding, 2.6 million tons of CO2offset • Non-profit • - Laboratory for innovative offset projects
Project Development Timeline Upfront Payment Proposal Contract Negotiation Annual Monitoring Due Diligence Commercial Operation Annual payment “upon delivery”
Peter Weisberg Offset Project Analyst pweisberg@climatetrust.org 503-238-1915 x 207