410 likes | 519 Views
FUTURE RESEARCH IN SUBSTANCE MISUSE AN OVERVIEVW PERSPECTIVE. Michael Farrell PHRN Manchester 20 th October 2006. Political and moral values of the social system . SERVICE Provider AND USER VIEW. Research Evidence. A model for evidence-based clinical decisions (from Haynes et al, 1996).
E N D
FUTURE RESEARCH IN SUBSTANCE MISUSE AN OVERVIEVW PERSPECTIVE Michael Farrell PHRN Manchester 20th October 2006
Political and moral values of the social system SERVICE Provider AND USER VIEW Research Evidence A model for evidence-based clinical decisions (from Haynes et al, 1996)
HIV prevalence among IDUs in the EU EMCDDA 2004Notes: Colour indicates midpointsLocal data shown in ()
HIV in IDUs in Europe • Marked difference between countries and within some countries • High prevalence countries (old MS) Italy, Spain, Portugal, followed by France • Some high prevalence estimates from new MS (Latvia, Estonia), and worries about others (Poland) • Low prevalence countries in both old and new MS including countries with high prevalence IDU • Cautious assessment is the long term trend appears to be stable or downwards • Some small increases in recent data in some countries or in specific subpopulations • Data quality problems so analysis must be made with caution
A note on HCV prevalence in IDUs • Prevalence estimates higher and more convergent than for HIV • Clear need to finding effective prevention strategies • Routine disease surveillance sources of limited value • Drug injecting principle route of transmission for HCV in Europe
Long term trend in acute drug-related deaths (1985-2003) 300 250 200 Index % (1985=100%) 150 100 50 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 100,0 104,5 118,7 136,9 153,7 181,0 216,4 223,5 201,8 212,2 225,4 252,4 230,1 235,6 241,1 255,4 240,1 205,8 194,9 INDEX EU 15, 1985 to 2003 index year 1985=100
Introduction of MMT & NSP, 1967 to 2001(EU, Norway and Bulgaria)
450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 LU UK ES IE MT FR PT IT SI DK EU DE NL NO SE EL BE CZ LT FI HU BG LV PL RO + 4 Estimated number of drug users in substitution treatment in 29 European countries (2003) per 100.000 population aged 15-64
600,000 537,000 500,000 400,000 351,000 265,000 300,000 207,000 200,000 73,400 100,000 0 1993 1995 1997 2000 2003 10-year trend in the number of substitution treatment clients in Europe (EU-15)
Buprenorphine Other 20% 1% Methadone 79% Proportion of substitution drugs used in medically assisted treatment in Europe, 2003
Prevalence of HIV in Injecting Drug Users some country estimates • European Union, Northern Europe low prevalence, Southern European countries higher prevalence but declining • Central and Eastern European countries upward trend, especially Ukraine, Russia, • USA and Canada generally stable low levels, outbreak Vancouver British Columbia related to cocaine injecting • Australia less than 2% • India Manipur Estimated at 50% plus • China Yunnan Province 10% to 70% in three years • Rapid increase in 31 provinces in China • Myanmar 56% IDUs HIV positive in one study • Vietnam 63% IDUs
HIV prevalence in injecting drug users Myanmar Manipur & Yunnan Edinburgh Ho Chi Minh City Lithuania Bangkok Odessa Jakarta
HIV infection rates in and out of substitution treatment (Metzger et al. 1993) Out % In %
Drug Overdose and Mortality • Mean of 5+ non fatal overdoses in heroin using cohorts • Mortality 1 to 2% • In methadone treatment down to 0.2% • Recent Hser 33 year longitudinal study reports over 50% mortality in cohort • Suicide completion rates high and significant contributor to overall suicide
The odds of a drug-related death in the first week of release among women • over 10times greater than that observed at one year (OR 10.6; 95%CI 4.8-22.0) • 70 times higher than age matched general population among men • around 8 times greater than at one year (OR 8.3: 95%CI 5.0-13.3). • 30 times higher than age matched general population (Singleton, Farrell et al 2003) • IN SUMMARY A 8-10 FOLD INCREASED RISK OF MORTALITY IN THE EARLY RELEASE PERIOD
Substitution in prisons • Estimated that over 30 million imprisoned annually • Major risk for blood borne virus spread • In most countries where measured between one third and half have drug dependence • RCT of methadone in prison (Dolan et al) demonstrates role in reduction of blood borne virus, and general improvement, and post release reduction in mortality for those who continue • Rapid expansion in Europe in substitution in prisons • Huge challenge for Asia pacific region where insitutional incarceration standard response to opioid dependence • Consistently 90% relapse to heroin use, no studies on mortality
Drug Substitution Treatment • Strong evidence for the benefits of oral methadone treatment RCTs +++ REASONABLE EFFECT SIZE • REDUCES DRUG CRIME .70 • REDUCES OPIATE CONSUMPTION .35 • REDUCES INJECTING & RISK TAKING 0.22 • Now good evidence for buprenorphine and LAAM RCTs ++ (LAAM CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW) • Use of injectable diamorphine and other drugs building evidence base for comparative effectiveness, more dicussion on comparative cost effectiveness.
Gunne & Gronbladh (1981) RCT:Methadone versus no methadone • 34 subjects using heroin by injection • 17 experimental (methadone) • 17 controls (no methadone) • Controls not allowed to enter MMT for 2 years • Followed up at 2 years and again at 4 years
A 33 year follow-up of narcotic addicts(Hser et al., 2001) 22% 2% 6% 7% 4% 48% 12% N 581 439 354 242 Age 24.5 (3.9) 36.8 (5.4) 47.6 (5.1) 57.4 (4.0)
A 33 year follow-up of narcotic addicts(Hser et al., 2001) 22% 2% 6% 7% 4% 48% 12% N 581 439 354 242 Age 24.5 (3.9) 36.8 (5.4) 47.6 (5.1) 57.4 (4.0)
Methadone maintenance for prisoners Source: NSW DCS Inmate Census, UK Home Office, World Prison Population List 4th Ed, US Department of Justice
NSW prison methadone program 1986 as a pilot pre release program by Department of Corrective Services (DCS) Criteria • 3-6 months prior to release • Past or present history of opiate dependence • History of returning to injecting and crime on previous releases • 3 designated community clinics 1990 those entering custody on MMT were continued Since 1990 12% NSW MMT received in custody
NDARC Methadone Study NSW prison methadone maintenance • Randomised control trail of 384 IDUs in 1997 and re-interviewed in 1998 • Heroin use was significantly less for those receiving methadone, as measured by hair analysis. Source: Dolan & Wodak
RCT Results MMT Control HCV incidence %24.3 31.7 Heroin (hair) %27 42 Heroin (SR) %33 78 No cases of HIV
NDARC Methadone Study Follow up after release from gaol study of above 384 IDUs examining rate of: • Incarceration • Mortality • Hepatitis C
HCV incidence (Intent) Source: Dolan, K
Re- incarceration up to May 2002 Source: Dolan, K
Need for upscaling of treatment • Urgent need in many regions for concerted effort to expand treatment • Discussions and research required on the challenge of upscaling • IDTS a major development within English Prisons • Major expansion in substitution treatment and psychosocial treatment
NEED TO EVALUATE IDTS • Implementation assessment • Cost Effectiveness • Environmental Impact • Individual Outcome • Impact on Recidivism • Impact on Post Release Mortality
Research Framework • Need pragmatic studies in prison context • More longitudinal studies • A 10 year mortality outcome study from the National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey • Consider a longitudinal Study of Young Offenders and exploration of trajectory of drug histories within the criminal justice system • Prisons ideal enviroments for exploration of issues of psychiatric comorbidity and substance use
Studies linked to community studies • Linking treatment in prison up to the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System • Currently Outcomes Monitoring Project Underway, Important to have Prison Treatment Linked into this. • Infectious Diseases remain a big threat especially BBVs
Conclusions • The huge challenge in all settings is to develop a comprehensive range of interventions that are humanitarian, effective and impactful for the all those who require interventions • To ensure that ethical and humane treatment is delivered as effectively as possible in all settings