1 / 6

Literature Review for the SUST-RUS project

Literature Review for the SUST-RUS project. Salavat Gabdrakhmanov (CEFIR). Features of the Review. Emphasis on actual environmental CGE models in use Particular features of those models connected with the environmental dimension Broad range of models. Structure of the Review, I.

willa
Download Presentation

Literature Review for the SUST-RUS project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Literature Review for the SUST-RUS project Salavat Gabdrakhmanov (CEFIR)

  2. Features of the Review • Emphasis on actual environmental CGE models in use • Particular features of those models connected with the environmental dimension • Broad range of models

  3. Structure of the Review, I • Introduction: • Concept of sustainable development • CGE in policy analysis • Organization of review • Economy: • Firm behavior • Industry structure • Consumer behavior • Government sector • Dynamics

  4. Structure of the Review, II • Environment • Emission accounting • Pollution abatement • Environmental feedback • Conclusion Bibliography

  5. Models under review • GEM-E3 (Europe, world) • EPPA (world) • MMRF-GREEN (Australia) • GreenMod II (Belgium) • GTAP-E (world) • ISEEM (Belgium) • TEQUILA (Mexico, Costa Rica, Chile; China, Indonesia, Vietnam) • DEAN (nonspecific, used for Netherlands) • Model for Ireland

  6. Issues for comments • Abrasive language sometimes; possibly, uneven level of exposition clarity • Emphasis on environmental side • Lack of social dimension of sustainable development (not in the models anyway) • Dynamics, pollution abatement and environmental feedback not important? • Insufficient discussion of particular environmental policy measures

More Related