1.06k likes | 1.22k Views
M. Wirth Department of Urology, Technical University of Dresden. Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy. Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy: Background. PSA-relapse after RPE in locally advanced PCa (n=2091).
E N D
M. Wirth Department of Urology, Technical University of Dresden • Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy
Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy: Background
PSA-relapse after RPE in locally advanced PCa (n=2091) % PSA-relapse (0.2 ng/ml) after 10 years 100 80 60 preop. PSA 40 20+ ng/ml 20 10.1-20 ng/ml 4.1-10 ng/ml 0-4 ng/ml 0 6- 4+3 8-10 3+4 Gleason-Score Han, Partin et al., J Urol 2003
extracapsular: 82 % organconfined: 18 % cT3: MSKCC-Nomogramm: pT Stage Exampel: cT3, PSA 10 ng/ml, Gleason 4+4=8 Ohori, Kattan et al., J Urol 2004
extracapsular: 50 % organconfined: 50 % cT3:MSKCC-Nomogramm:pT-Stage Exampel: cT3, PSA 10 ng/ml, Gleason 3+3=6 Ohori, Kattan et al., J Urol 2004
Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy after Margin Positive Radical Prostatectomy • Patients with R1 after RPE are at an increased risk of biochemical, local and distant failure [1]. • With R1, the risk of biochemical recurrence may supersede 50 % after 10-years [2]. • The associated 10-year local recurrence rate accounts for narrowly 30 % [2]. 1 EAU guidelines 2008; 2 Pfitzenmaier et al., BJU Int 2008
Adjuvant Radiotherapy vs. Wait-and-see after Radical Prostatectomy
Wait-and-see vs. immediate postoperative radiotherapy - EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) • randomised controlled trial • pT3 or positive margins, pN0 • age < 76 years, WHO perf. status 0-1 • wait-and-see (n=503) vs. irradition (60 Gy) within 16 w. after RPE (n=502) • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
wait-and-see vs. immediate postoperative radiotherapy - EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) • age 65 y. (61-69) • PSA: 12.4 ng/ml (7.2-20.3) • PSA: 3 weeks after RPE, before RTX0.2 (0.0-0.3) • median FU 5 y. • biochemical and clinical progression free survival significantly improved after ART • overall survival with trend towards improvement after ART, but not (yet?) significant • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005)clinical progression free survival Clinical progression-free survival • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005)biochemical progression free survival PSA progression-free survival • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) cumulative incidence of locoreg. failure local progression-free survival • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
Patients who benefit from immediate postoperative RT – EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) Van der Kwast, JCO 2007
Patients who benefit from immediate postoperative RT – EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) Margins ECE SV Gleason Postop. PSA Van der Kwast, JCO 2007
Patients who benefit from immediate postoperative RT – EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) Van der Kwast, JCO 2007
Patients who benefit from immediate postoperative RT – EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) control arm Van der Kwast, JCO 2007
Patients who benefit from immediate postoperative RT – EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005) immediate postoperative radiation Van der Kwast, JCO 2007
EORTC trial 22911 (n=1005)cumulative incidence of late complications Late complications • Bolla et al., Lancet 2005
Adjuvant RTX for T3N0M0 PCA – randomised SWOG trial 8794 (n=425) • Randomised controlled trial • clinical T1/T2 preoperatively • pT3 or positive margins, N0 M0 • WHO perf. status 0-2 • Wait-and-see (n=211) vs. Irradition (60-64 Gy, n=214) • Thompson et al., J Urol 2009
100 80 60 Percentage 40 20 0 Adjuvant RT in pT3 PCA (randomised study SWOG 8794, n=425) Thompson et al., JAMA 2006
Adjuvant RTX for T3N0M0 PCA – randomised SWOG trial 8794 (n=425) Overall survival p=0.023 • Thompson et al., J Urol 2009
Adjuvant RTX for T3N0M0 PCA – randomised SWOG trial 8794 (n=425) Metastatic-free survival p=0.016 • Thompson et al., J Urol 2009
Adjuvant RTX for T3N0M0 PCA – randomised SWOG trial 8794 (n=425) Metastatic-free survival, PSA < / > 0.2 p=0.03 • Thompson et al., J Urol 2009
Adjuvant RTX for T3N0M0 PCA – randomised SWOG trial 8794 (n=425) Summary • Thompson et al., J Urol 2009
Adjuvant radiotherapy after RPE (ARO 96-02 / AUO AP 09/95, pT3R0-1, PSA 0, n=108) % PSA recurrence after 4 years 100 p<0.0001, hazard ratio 0.4 80 60 81 % 40 60 % 20 0 adjuvant RT (60 Gy)no adjuvant RT Wiegel et al., ASCO 2005 [in press as full article: J Clin Oncol 2009]
RPE with and without adjuvant RT in pT3-PCA Bottke and Wiegel, Urol Int 2007
Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for pathologic T3 or margin-positive prostate cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis Survival Biochemical progression Morgan et al., Radiother Oncol 2008
Salvage Radiotherapy vs. Observation at PSA Failure after Radical Prostatectomy
PCA specific survival following salvage RTX vs observation after RPE – survival • no salvage treatment (n=397) vs. salvage radiotherapy (n=160) vs. salvage radiotherapy + HT (n=78) • significant increase of PC-specific survival for both SRT (HR 0.32, p<0.001) and SRT+HT (HR 0.34, p=0.003) • improvement limited to patients with - PSA-doubling time < 6 month - SRT within 2 y. after recurrence • Trock et al., JAMA 2009
PCA specific survival following salvage RTX vs. observation after RPE – survival PCA specific survival • Trock et al., JAMA 2009
PSA failure following salvage radiotherapy – CaPSURE data (retrospective study, n=194) Macdonald et al., Urol Oncol 2008
Radiotherapy at biochemical recurrence after RPE(retrospective study, n=162) No biochemical recurrence Wiegel et al., IJROBP 2008
Radiotherapy at biochemical recurrence after RPE(retrospective study, n=162) No biochemical recurrence Wiegel et al., IJROBP 2008
Radiotherapy at biochemical recurrence after RPE(retrospective study, n=162) No biochemical recurrence Wiegel et al., IJROBP 2008
Salvage RTX at PSA progression: long-term efficacy Literature review 35-54 % Bottke and Wiegel, Urologe 2008
Arguments pro delayed radiotherapy for positive surgical margins • Questionable survival advantage for immediate adjuvant RTX • Sparing of side effects and costs in about 50 % of patients • Improved risk stratification by monitoring of PSA value and PSA kinetics • High rate of disease control with timely applied salvage therapy
Adjuvant vs. Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy
Adjuvant vs. Salvage Radiotherapy Matched-control analysis (n=192) Five-year freedom from biochemical failure from end of RT Trabulsi et al., Urology 2008
Adjuvant vs. Salvage Radiotherapy Matched-control analysis (n=192) Five-year freedom from biochemical failure from end of surgery Trabulsi et al., Urology 2008
Adjuvant and Salvage RTX after RPE Biochemical failure free survival Adjuvant RT Salvage RT n=410 Jereczek-Fossa, IntJRadOncol 2008
Adjuvant and Salvage RTX after RPE Grade 2 or greater rectal and urinary toxicity n=410 Adjuvant RT Salvage RT Jereczek-Fossa, IntJRadOncol 2008
Adjuvant and Salvage RTX after RPE Biochemical failure free survival • Taylor et al., IntJRadOncBiolPhys 2003
Adjuvant and Salvage RTX after RPE Biochemical failure free survival • Taylor et al., IntJRadOncBiolPhys 2003 Adjuvant RT
Adjuvant and Salvage RTX after RPE Biochemical failure free survival • Taylor et al., IntJRadOncBiolPhys 2003 Salvage RT +/- adj. androgen ablation
Conclusions: This study is the first to report a significant protective role for adjuvant RT in BCR-free survival and CSS of node-positive patients. Da Pozzo et al., Eur Urol 2009
Adjuvant RTX for pN+ disease (retrospective study, n=250) No biochemical failure Da Pozzo et al., Eur Urol 2009
Adjuvant RTX for pN+ disease (retrospective study, n=250) PCA-specific survival Da Pozzo et al., Eur Urol 2009
RT for PSA-Recurrence after RPE: Dosage?(n=122) No new PSA-recurrence p<0.0001 0 3 6y King et al. IJROBP 2008
odds-ratio for secondary malignancy 2 1.5 1.89 (1.85-1.95) 1 0.5 0 PCA, RT PCA, no RT RT in prostate cancer induces secondary malignancies (n=130.375 vs. 375.235) ! Chamie et al., AUA 2008 #393