1 / 12

Using Trust and Provenance for Content Filtering on the Semantic Web

Using Trust and Provenance for Content Filtering on the Semantic Web. By Jen Golbeck & Aaron Mannes Maryland Information Network Dynamic Lab University of Maryland, College Park. What are social networks. Connections between people Can be Explicit (people say who they know)

williamg
Download Presentation

Using Trust and Provenance for Content Filtering on the Semantic Web

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Trust and Provenance for Content Filtering on the Semantic Web By Jen Golbeck & Aaron Mannes Maryland Information Network Dynamic Lab University of Maryland, College Park

  2. What are social networks • Connections between people • Can be • Explicit (people say who they know) • Derived (e.g. from email archives) • Simulated

  3. Web-Based Social Networks (WBSNs) • Websites and interfaces that let people maintain browsable lists of friends • Last count • 142 social networking websites • Over 200,000,000 accounts • Full list at http://trust.mindswap.org • Over 10,000,000 accounts are represented in FOAF, an OWL ontology

  4. Trust in WBSNs • People annotate their relationships with information about how much they trust their friends • Trust can be binary (trust or don’t trust) or on some scale • This work uses a 1-10 scale where 1 is low trust and 10 is high trust • At least 8 social networks have some mechanism for expressing trust

  5. Inferring Trust The Goal: Select two individuals - the source (node A) and sink (node C) - and recommend to the source how much to trust the sink. tAC A B C tAB tBC

  6. Trust Algorithm • If the source does not know the sink, the source asks all of its friends how much to trust the sink, and computes a trust value by a weighted average • Neighbors repeat the process if they do not have a direct rating for the sink

  7. Film Trust • Working example of this can be found at - FilmTrust available at http://trust.mindswap.org/FilmTrust • A movie recommendation site backed by a social network that uses trust values to generate predictive recommendations and sort reviews

  8. Applications of Trust • With direct knowledge or a recommendation about how much to trust people, this value can be used as a filter in many applications • Since social networks are so prominent on the web, it is a public, accessible data source for determining the quality of annotations and information

  9. Trust Networks & Intelligence • Intelligence agencies no longer face hierarchies, now they face networks • Several major intelligence failures due to lack of information-sharing or adequately questioning dominant assumptions • Sheer size of intelligence communities are often a barrier to information sharing • Trust networks could help intelligence agencies connect the dots

  10. Use Case Scenarios • Help individual analyst sort through mass of material by identifying reliable sources • Trust ratings would allow analysts to check veracity of information by seeing how sources are rated by other trusted analysts • Importance of outliers for red-teaming - a team comes to strong conclusions on an issue: policy-makers could use trust ratings to check with dissenters

  11. Uses for Meta-Data • Analyzing patterns of trust ratings could help break organizational barriers • While outliers are useful on a case by case basis they could also indicate an organizational dysfunction • A pattern of low trust ratings between units could indicate a conflict or lack of understanding • Alternately a pattern of particularly high ratings could indicate group think

  12. References • Papers and software available at http://trust.mindswap.org • FilmTrust available at http://trust.mindswap.org/FilmTrust • Terrorism Analysis available at http://profilesinterror.mindswap.org/ • golbeck@cs.umd.edu • awmannes@comcast.net

More Related