1 / 20

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope

Explore the design and objectives of GLAST, its instruments, sensitivity, and observations in the high-energy sky, focusing on AGNs and GRBs. Learn about pair conversion telescopes, EGRET survey results, and AGN and GRB physics phenomena. Discover the potential for GLAST to revolutionize high-energy astrophysics through enhanced data collection and analysis.

Download Presentation

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Wyndham El Conquistador Resort, Puerto Rico October 23 - 29, 2005 The Gamma Ray Large Area Space Telescope: an Astro-particle Mission to Explore the High Energy Sky Luca Baldini INFN - Pisa

  2. GLAST GLAST: Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) Large Area Telescope (LAT) Launch Vehicle Delta II – 2920-10H Launch Location Kennedy Space Center Orbit Altitude 575 Km Orbit Inclination 28.5 degrees Orbit Period 95 Minutes Launch Date mid 2007 • Large Area Telescope (LAT): • Pair conversion telescope. • Converter foils + tracker + calorimeter - surrounded by an anticoincidence shield. • Will detect photons in the 20 MeV – 300 GeV range. • GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM): • Set of 14 scintillators monitoring the full sky. • Energy range: 10 keV – 25 MeV. • Optimize to detect GRBs.

  3. The need for a high-energy g-ray detector • Broad spectral coverage is crucial for understanding most astrophysical sources. • Multiwavelenght campaigns: space based and ground based experiments cover complimentary energy ranges. • The improved sensitivity of GLAST will match the sensitivity of the next generation of Cherenkov telescopes filling the energy gap in between the two approaches. • Overlap for the brighter sources: cross calibration, alerts. • Predicted sensitivity to point sources: • EGRET, GLAST and MILAGRO: 1 year survey. • Cherenkov telescopes: 50 hours observation. (from Weekes, et al. 1996 – GLAST added)

  4. Outline • Talk outline: • The scientific case for the GLAST experiment . • Experimental technique and design of the Large Area Telescope. • Design, construction and testing of the silicon tracker. • Conclusions

  5. The sky above 100 MeV: the EGRET survey • The heritage of EGRET: • Diffuse extra-galactic background (~ 1.5 x 10-5 cm-2s-1sr-1 integral flux). • Much larger (~ 100 times) background on the galactic plane (60% of 1.4 Mg). • Few hundreds of point sources (both galactic and high latitude, 10% of the total photons). • Essential characteristic: variability in time.

  6. Sky map GLAST Survey: ~300 sources (2 days) GLAST Survey: ~10,000 sources (2 years) EGRET Survey: 271 sources

  7. Unidentified sources • 170 point sources of the EGRET catalog still unidentified (no know counterpart at other wavelengths). • GLAST will provide much smaller error bars on sources location (at arc-minute level). • GLAST will be able to detect typical signatures (spectral features, flares, pulsation) allowing an easier identification with know sources. • Most of the EGRET diffuse background will be resolved into point sources. • Large effective area and good angular resolution are crucial! Cygnus region: 15o x 15o, E > 1 GeV Counting stats not included.

  8. Active Galactic Nuclei • AGNs phenomenology: • Vast amount of energy from a very compact central volume. • Large fluctuations in the luminosity (with ~ hour timescale). • Energetic, highly collimated, relativistic particle jets • Prevailing idea: accretion onto super-massive black holes (106 – 1010 solar masses). • AGN physics to-do-list: • Catalogue AGN classes with a large data sample (at least ~ 3000 new AGNs) • Detailed study of the high energy spectral behavior. • Track flares (t ~ minutes). • Large effective area and excellent spectral capabilities needed!

  9. Gamma Ray Bursts • GRBs phenomenology: • Dramatic variations in the light curve on a very short time scale. • Isotropic distribution in the sky (basically from BATSE, on board CGRO, but little data @ energies > 50 MeV). • Non repeating (as far as we can tell…). • Spectacular energies (~ 1051 – 1052 erg). • GRBs physics: • GLAST should detect ~ 200 GRBs per year above 100 MeV (a good fraction of them localized to better than 10’ in real time). • The LAT will study the GeV energy range. • A separate instrument on the spacecraft (the GBM) will cover the 10 keV – 25 MeV energy range. • Short dead time crucial! Simulated 1 year GLAST operation (Assuming a various spectral index/flux.)

  10. Experimental technique Pair conversion exploited (provides the information about the g direction/energy and a clear signature for background rejection). • Pair conversion telescope: • Tracker/converter (detection planes + high Z foils): photon conversion and reconstruction of the direction (via electron/positron track reconstruction). Main L1 trigger (three x-y planes in a row hit) for GLAST. • Calorimeter: energy measurements. • Anti-coincidence shield: background rejection (charged cosmic rays flux typically ~104 higher than g flux). Real data collected during the integration and testing activity.

  11. g e+ e- Overview of the Large Area Telescope • Overall modular design: • 4x4 array of identical towers - each one including a Tracker, a Calorimeter and an Electronics Module. • Surrounded by an Anti-Coincidence shield (not shown in the picture). • Tracker/Converter (TKR): • Silicon strip detectors (single sided, each layer is rotated by 90 degrees with respect to the previous one). • W conversion foils. • ~80 m2 of silicon (total). • ~106 electronics chans. • High precision tracking, small dead time. • Anti-Coincidence (ACD): • Segmented (89 tiles). • Self-veto @ high energy limited. • 0.9997 detection efficiency (overall). • Calorimeter (CAL): • 1536 CsI crystals. • 8.5 radiation lengths. • Hodoscopic. • Shower profile reconstruction (leakage correction)

  12. Tracker design • Aggressive mechanical design: • Less than 2 mm spacing between x and y layers, with front-end electronics lying on the four sides of the trays. • 90° pitch adapters from the front end chips to the silicon sensors. • 2 mm inter-tower separation in order to minimize the inactive area.

  13. The Silicon Tracker performance • Construction/testing highlights: • Average detection efficiency higher than 99.5% @ the nominal threshold setting. • Single strip noise occupancy lower than 10-6. • Flight production completed in less than one year. 11500 sensors 360 trays 18 towers ~ 1M channels 83 m2 Si surface

  14. LAT status Current status: • All the 16 towers (Tracker + Calorimeter + Electronics) integrated in the flight grid. • ACD ready to be integrated with the rest of the instrument. Coming soon: • Beam test of the calibration unit (2 spare TKR modules + 4 spare CAL modules). • LAT environmental tests. • Integration with the spacecraft. • Launch.

  15. Summary/conclusions • GLAST has a tremendous potential of discovery. • The GLAST mission will be one of the next big NASA observatories. • The GLAST LAT tracker is the largest Si tracker ever built for a space application (80 m2 of active silicon surface, ~1M channels). • Construction is completed, integration of the LAT is now reaching its completion. • Next steps are the environmental tests of the instrument and the beam test on the calibration unit. • Launch foreseen in August 2007. RXTE launch on a DELTA II rocket.

  16. Spares

  17. GLAST vs. EGRET 1After background rejection. 2Single photon, 68% containment, on axis. 31s, on axis. 41s radius, high latitude source with 10-7 cm-2s-1 integral flux above 100 MeV. 51 year sky survey, high latitude, above 100 MeV.

  18. Technology impact on instrument performance II

  19. Technology impact on instrument performance I

  20. Triggering and On-board Data Flow • Level 1 trigger: • Hardware trigger, single-tower level. • Three_in_a_row: three consecutive tracker x-y planes in a row fired. Workhorse g trigger. • CAL_LO: single log with E > 100 MeV (adjustable). Independent check on TKR trigger. • CAL_HI: single log with E > 1 GeV (adjustable). Disengage the use of the ACD. • Chargedcosmic rays in the L1T! 13 kHz peak rate. • Upon a L1T the LAT is read out within 20 ms. • On-board processing: • Identify g candidates and reduce the data volume. • Full instrument information available to the on-board processor. • Use simple and robust quantities. • Hierarchical process (first make the simple selections requiring little CPU and data unpacking). x x x • Level 3 trigger: • Final L3T rate: ~ 30 Hz on average. • Expected average g rate: ~ few Hz (g rate : cosmic rays rate = 1 : few). • On-board science analysis (flares, bursts). • Data transfer to the spacecraft.

More Related