1 / 29

A Survey of Software Refactoring Tom Mens, Tom Tourwé

This survey explores the concepts of software restructuring and refactoring, with a focus on preserving behavior. It covers different types of software artifacts, tools and qualities of refactoring tools, and the process of refactoring. The importance of behavior preservation through assertions and formalisms is discussed, along with examples and techniques for verifying and ensuring behavior preservation.

williamsjerry
Download Presentation

A Survey of Software Refactoring Tom Mens, Tom Tourwé

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Survey of Software Refactoring Tom Mens, Tom Tourwé IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL. XX, NO. Y, MONTH 2004 Presented by: Kishen Maloor

  2. Overview • Restructuring, refactoring and associated activities • Behavior preservation – Assertions, Formalisms… • Types of software artifacts • Tool support • Qualities of refactoring tools • Process support • Conclusion

  3. Restructuring and refactoring • Restructuring is a transformation from one form of presentation to another • Refactoring is the object-oriented variant of restructuring • The subjects external behavior is preserved • Idea is to make existing code more extensible

  4. Refactoring activities • Identify where the software should be refactored • Determine which refactoring(s) should be applied to the identified places • Guarantee that the applied refactoring preserves behaviour • Apply the refactoring • Assess the effect of the refactoring on quality characteristics of the software • Maintain the consistency between the refactored program code and other software artifacts

  5. Behavior Preservation • A refactoring is a parameterized behavior-preserving program transformation • Approaches to behavior preservation may perform checks either statically or dynamically Input Original System 2 … 1+1 2-3 5+3 4*6 = Refactored System 2 … Source: spic.kaist.ac.kr/~selab/html/Study/Lab%20Seminar/A%20Survey%20of%20Software%20Refactoring.ppt

  6. Behavior Preservation • Static: - Preconditions, graph transformations, (access, update and call) preservations, type checking… • Dynamic: - Take dynamic information into account - Checks more aspects of the program behavior - WSL comes along with a tool that preserves dynamic behavior of programs [Bennett, 1995]

  7. Behavior Preservation • Ideally, the behavior preservation of refactorings should be proven formally. • But, proving semantic correctness is an undecidable problem [Gupta, 1996] • Therefore, a more conservative, engineering approach is needed • We could do rigorous testing of the code • We could use Assertions and formalisms to check for behavior preservation

  8. Assertions • Identify a set of invariants in the program that preserve its behavior for refactorings • Create a set of conditions which guarantee that these invariants hold • Pre- and postconditions are therefore formulated and checked before and after refactorings are applied • Are a lightweight and automatic means of verification

  9. Example of use of assertions Before refactoring After refactoring Consider the refactoring: Add Class (new name, package, superclasses, subclasses) Source: https://www.iam.unibe.ch/scg/svn_repos/Talks/OORP/Store/Refactoring-Lecture.ppt

  10. Example of use of assertions • Preconditions • no class or global variable exists with new name in the same scope • subclasses are all subclasses of all superclasses • Postconditions • new class is added into the hierarchy with superclasses as superclasses and subclasses as subclasses • new class has name new name • subclasses inherit from new class and not anymore from superclasses • Invariant:Classes A, B & F are defined before and after the refactoring

  11. Problems with assertions • Opdyke proposed a set of seven invariants to preserve behavior for refactorings [Opdyke, 1992] • Ex: Distinct class, Type safe assignments, Compatible signatures in member function definition, Inherited member variables not defined, Distinct member names, Distinct class names etc. • A more complex language may need more preconditions • Opdyke’s invariants were observed to be insufficient for C++ [Tokuda, 2001]

  12. Problems with assertions • Static checking of preconditions can sometimes be very expensive • Preconditions do not consider the size or structure of programs • [Roberts, 1999] suggests a way to augment refactorings with postconditions

  13. Formalisms • Graph Transformations- Programs represented as graphs- Refactorings correspond to graph production rules- Application of refactorings correspond to a graph transformation- Assertions specified as application pre- and postconditions • Provides formal support for refactoring

  14. Formalisms • [Mens, 2002] uses graph rewriting to show that certain kinds of program behavior are preserved using static analysis • Graph transformations can be used to reason about dependence between refactorings Ex. Move method and Rename method • Analysis of sequential dependencies between refactorings can be useful

  15. Other useful techniques • Program Slicing • Formal concept analysis • Software metrics • Software visualization • Dynamic program analysis

  16. Types of software artifacts • Program source code- Supported by a variety of programming paradigms (Imperative, OO, Functional, AOP)- Formal support (WSL) • Non-OO languages are as such more difficult to restructure • More complex the language, harder it is to automate the refactoring process

  17. Types of software artifacts • Refactoring of designs, a recent research trend • Independent of the underlying programming language • Refactoring of UML diagrams [Boger, 2002] • Refactoring pre- and post-conditions can be expressed using OCL

  18. Types of software artifacts • Design patterns describe program structure at a higher level • Refactorings are used to introduce new design pattern instances into software

  19. Types of software artifacts • Restructuring software architectures- based on graphical representation of the architecture [Philipps, 1997] - Behavior specified by casual relationship between two components is preserved • Software requirements- [Russo, 1998] restructure natural language requirements

  20. Tool support • Semiautomatic approach Refactoring Move Method Add Class Op1 Op2 Opn ? ? Refactored System ? Refactoring operations Source: spic.kaist.ac.kr/~selab/html/Study/Lab%20Seminar/A%20Survey%20of%20Software%20Refactoring.ppt

  21. Tool support • In the semiautomatic approach, thedeveloper:- Identifies the part of the software to be refactored and selects an appropriate refactoring to apply • Application of the refactoring is automatic • Fully automated refactoring has been demonstrated to be feasible [Moore, 1996]

  22. Tool support • Fully automatic approach: - Refactorings can be easily undone - Can make the code difficult to understand • Semiautomatic approach: - For large software, needs lots of human interaction; time consuming! - More useful-most knowledge required to perform refactoring cannot be extracted from software

  23. Qualities of refactoring tools • Reliability-Is it possible to check if the provided refactorings are truly behavior preserving? • Tools check preconditions before applying them and perform tests afterwards • Tools provide an undo mechanism to make undesired changes undone • Coverage specifies the number of refactoring activities supported by the tool

  24. Qualities of refactoring tools • Configurability- Modifying bad smell specifications- Changing the links between bad smells and refactorings • [Leitao, 2002] specifies a pattern language to express refactorings • [Munoz, 2003] provides configurable threshold values to specify conditions for a bad smell

  25. Qualities of refactoring tools • Scalability- Combine frequently used primitive refactorings into composite refactorings - Better capture intent of software change - Performance gain - Weaken behavior preservation requirements for primitive refactorings- Support for cascaded refactorings [Tourwe, 2003]

  26. Qualities of refactoring tools • Language Independence- Applicability to different languages- Provide hooks to add language specific behavior • [Lammel, 2002] proposes generic program refactoring – a language parametric framework, can be used with Java, XML… • [Mens, 2002] Meta-model based approach • Use of an intermediate formal language [Bennett, 1995]

  27. Process Support • An important activity in the software development process • Software Reengineering- To restructure legacy software to implement a new solution- To assist a MDA tool

  28. Process Support • Agile Software Development (XP) - Develops and refactor software in small iterations • Framework-Based or Product Line Development

  29. Conclusion • Provided an overview of refactoring; spoke about the different refactoring activities, prevalent problems and open issues, tool support for refactoring • Spoke about how refactoring fits into the software engineering process • Cited several relevant publications

More Related