560 likes | 658 Views
Understand the order and time limits of Lincoln-Douglas debate speeches. Learn note-taking techniques and key terms like burden of proof and grace period. Discover how to construct affirmative and negative cases effectively. Improve debate skills with strategies for constructing speeches, cross-examinations, rebuttals, and more.
E N D
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS CASE CONSTRUCTION 3 3.1 Overview of the Speeches 3.2Affirmative Case Construction 3.3Negative Case Construction
3.1OVERVIEW OF THE SPEECHES GOALS Knowthe order and time limit of each speech in a round. Learn how to take and organize notes using a flow sheet.
TERMS • burden of proof • grace period • rebuttal • refute • dropped point • flow sheet • flowing • preflow
Speeches and Time Limits • As a debate participant, you must be prepared to present • The affirmative side • The negative side • Clear and concise presentation are important. • Speeches in a Lincoln-Douglas debate are • Presented in a specific order • Have pre-determined time limits
When you represent the affirmative side, you must show the judge • Why the resolution should be adopted or • Why you offer the best solution
Burden of proof • The obligation to approve what is stated or disputed • The affirmative side delivers both the first and last speeches. • Grace period • Additional time added to the original time allowance • Usually no more than 30 seconds • Not all judges grant a grace period.
Affirmative Constructive Speech • The first speech of the Lincoln-Douglas debate • The only speech that can be completely prepared before the debate. • Present all major arguments in your case • Statistics • Quotations • Examples • Studies • Reports
For the affirmative constructive speech • Use all six minutes • Face the judge • Not your opponent
Negative Cross-Examination • Ask questions of your opponent during cross-examination periods. • Challenge the affirmative’s arguments • Clarify meanings • Obtain information that they missed • Set up your next arguments • Three minute time limit • Rebuttal • The speech which allows you to counter the attacks and positions of your opponent.
Negative Constructive Rebuttal • Seven minute time limit. • First two or three minutes • Present your stand regarding the resolution. • During the remaining time • Present a rebuttal to show fault with the affirmative’s arguments and/or value. • Attack each of the key issues of your opponent’s case.
Affirmative Cross-Examination • Three minute time limit • The affirmative debater asks the negative side questions about its case.
First Affirmative Rebuttal • Four minute time limit • Rebuild your case • Attack the negative’s case • Refute • Prove false the attacks against your case • Do not introduce new evidence
Negative Rebuttal • Six minute time limit • The negative’s final chance to make an impression on the judge. • Only respond to arguments that you responded to in the negative constructive rebuttal.
Second Affirmative Rebuttal • Three minute time limit • The affirmative’s final chance • Tell the judge • How your case best supports your value • Why your value is better than your opponent’s value • How your value best upholds the resolution
Dropped point • Any argument not addressed in the first rebuttal for the affirmative and the first constructive for the negative
Prep Time • Three to four minutes • Can be used at any time during the debate • It is recommended that you save much of the time for the final speeches.
Flowing • Flow sheet • A piece of paper divided into rows or columns • Highlights and organizes the main arguments and evidence of both the affirmative and the negative • Helps with rebuttal preparation • Flowing • Process of taking notes on the flow sheet
Preflow • When a person on the affirmative side writes down arguments into the first column of the flow sheet before the debate begins • Flowing makes it easier to remember key points about your opponent’s speech. • It helps you prepare your rebuttals. • Use shorthand to help flowing.
3.2AFFIRMATIVE CASE CONSTRUCTION GOALS Knowhow to prepare an effective affirmative constructive speech. List tips to help you in a cross-examination period. Understand what should be presented in an affirmative rebuttal.
TERMS • contention • voting issue • crystallization
Affirmative Constructive Speech • There are three basic parts to the speech • The opening statement • 50 to 60 seconds suggested • The body • 5 to 5 ½ minutes suggested • The conclusion • 45 to 75 seconds suggested
Opening Statement • In sixty seconds or less, you should • Grab the judge’s attention • State the resolution and define its terms • State the value and value criteria
Grab the Judge’s Attention • Be original • Consider using • A quotation • Use a reliable source • An interesting statistic • An unfamiliar fact
State the Resolution and Define its Terms • Read the resolution word for word as it was written by the framers. • Define key words of the resolution. • Cite your source.
State the Value and Value Criteria • State the value and the value criteria at the end of the introduction. • Explain how they relate to the topic.
Body • Build a case that upholds your value. • Contention • A self-contained major argument • Every affirmative constructive speech should have two or three contentions. • Present the contentions in order of importance.
Conclusion • Summarize your case by reminding the judge of your contentions. • Restate the value and value criteria and how it supports the resolution. • Ask the judge to vote for you. • Let your opponent know you are ready for cross-examination.
Affirmative Cross-Examination • Prepare some questions in advance of the debate. • Write new questions on your flow sheet. • Face the judge even when addressing your opponent. • Stay calm. • Do not ask open-ended questions. • Answer questions directly and honestly.
Affirmative Rebuttal • Four minute limit • Address each attack made against your case. • There are two ways to challenge your opponent’s arguments: • Attack the argument or evidence used • Attack the soundness of the opponent’s logic
Accomplish the following during the final rebuttal: • Emphasize your opponent’s greatest weaknesses. • Rebuild your position.
Present convincing arguments. • Voting issues • Arguments which prove why you should win the round • Crystallization • Gives the judge information to put all of the arguments together so the debate winner can be decided • Ask the judge to vote for you.
3.3NEGATIVE CASE CONSTRUCTION GOALS Identifythe purpose of cross-examination questions. Understand the two parts of a negative constructive rebuttal. Describe the purpose of a negative rebuttal.
TERMS • road map • line-by-line presentation • signpost • preempting
Negative Cross-Examination • Use the negative cross-examination period to ask questions of your opponent. • The questions can serve any of the following purposes: • Challenging the affirmative’s arguments • Clarifying meanings of key terms or arguments • Obtaining information that you missed • Setting up your next arguments
Control the cross-examination period. • Avoid questions that require an in-depth answer. • Use the information received during the cross-examination period in your rebuttal.
Negative Constructive Rebuttal • This speech has two parts. • The negative constructive speech • A rebuttal speech • The constructive portion is pre-written.
Negative Constructive Speech • Use an opening statement that catches the judge’s attention. • Repeat the resolution. • State the value on which you believe the resolution should be argued as well as its criteria. • The body contains your contentions. • Back each contention with supporting evidence.
Rebuttal • The rebuttal should show fault with the affirmative’s arguments and/or value. • Road map • Informing the judge exactly what you are going to refute • Line-by-line presentation • Presenting your counterarguments point by point in the order that your opponent presented them
The Four Steps of Refuting • Signpost • Clearly signaling with words to identify which of the arguments you are refuting • State • Make your counter argument • Support • Refer to your research • Summarize • Show how your argument is stronger than your opponent’s
The “No Neg” Case • There is a new trend in some Lincoln-Douglas debates where the negative case is not presented. • This can cause two problems: • The judge has only one area to consider. • You are allowing your opponent to suggest to the judge that you have been abusive in the round.