550 likes | 555 Views
This presentation compares the aims, structure, content, and assessment of Technical Mathematics and Mathematics CAPS in the context of teaching and learning. It explores the definitions, specific aims, differences, common structure, and assessment of the two subjects.
E N D
USAF CoP : Teaching and Learning of Mathematics “Technical Mathematics” UNISA (Pretoria) Bamboo Auditorium 19 February 2019 Presented by: MA HENDRICKS
Comparison of the Aims , Structure , Content and Assessment of the Papers for Technical Mathematics & Mathematics CAPS ( Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement)
CAPS DEFINITIONS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICS • Mathematics is a LANGUAGE that makes use of symbols and notations describing numerical , geometric and graphical representations.
CAPS DEFINITIONS MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS • It is a HUMAN ACTIVITY that involves observing, representing and investigating patterns and qualitative relationships in physical and social phenomena and between mathematical objects themselves
CAPS DEFINITIONS MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS • It helps to DEVELOP MENTAL PROCESSES that enhance logical and critical thinking , accuracy and problem solving that will contribute in decision making.
CAPS DEFINITIONS MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS. • Mathematical problem solving enables us to understand the world (physical, social and economic) around us , and, most of all to teach us to think creatively.
CAPS DEFINITIONS MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS • The aim of Technical Mathematics is to APPLY the Science of Mathematics to the TECHNICAL FIELD • where the emphasis is • on APPLICATION • and • not on abstract ideas.
SPECIFIC AIMS DIFFERENCES MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS. • To provide the opportunity to develop in learners the ability to be methodical , to generalize , • make conjectures • and try to justify • or prove them.. • To provide the opportunity to develop in learners the ability to be methodical , to generalize and • to be skillful users of • the Science of • Mathematics
SPECIFIC AIMS (DIFFERENCES) MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS • To provide learners of Technical Schools an alternative and value adding substitute to Mathematical Literacy. • To support and sustain technical subjects at Technical Schools
SPECIFIC AIMS (DIFFERENCES) MATHEMATICS TECHNICAL MATHEMATICS To provide a vocational route aligned with the expectations of labour in order to ensure direct access to learnership/ apprenticeship. To create the opportunity for learners to further their studies at FET Colleges at an entrance level of N4 and thus creating an alternative route to access other HEI’s.
OVERVIEW COMMON STRUCTURE PAPER 1 SIMILAR CONTENT PAPER 2 ASSESSMENT DIFFERENCES
STRUCTURE OF THE TWO PAPERS PAPER 1 PAPER 1 e
STRUCTURE OF THE TWO PAPERS PAPER 1 e PAPER 2
STRUCTURE OF THE TWO PAPERS COMMON PAPER 2 PAPER 1 FOUR Topics ALGEBRA FUNCTIONS FINANCE DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS THREE Topics ANALYTICAL GEOMETRY TRIGONOMETRY EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY
STRUCTURE OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 2 PAPER 1 Technical Mathematics CIRCLE (SECTORS /SEGMENTS) RADIAN MEASURE ANGULAR MOVEMENT Technical Mathematics OTHER NUMBER SYSTEMS - Binary numbers - Complex Numbers INTEGRATION Mathematics NUMBER PATTERNS PROBABILITY Mathematics STATISTICS
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS SIMILAR PAPER 1
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 1
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS PAPER 1 SIMILAR DIFFERENCES
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS PAPER 1 SIMILAR DIFFERENCES
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS SIMILAR PAPER 1
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 1
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 1
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS SIMILAR PAPER 2
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 2
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS SIMILAR PAPER 2
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 2
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS SIMILARITIES PAPER 2 DIFFERENCES
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 2
CONTENT OF THE TWO PAPERS DIFFERENCES PAPER 2
ASSESSMENT OF THE TWO PAPERS WEIGHTING OF TOPICS PAPER 1
ASSESSMENT OF THE TWO PAPERS WEIGHTING OF TOPICS PAPER 2
ASSESSMENT OF THE TWO PAPERS WEIGHTING OF TAXONOMY LEVELS DIFFERENCES PAPER 1 & 2