1 / 16

Organizational Learning to Integrate Sustainability

Organizational Learning to Integrate Sustainability. Bernd Siebenhüner/Marlen Arnold Oldenburg University. GELENA Research Group Social Learning and Sustainability Oldenburg University. Agenda. Background Framework Findings Consequences.

wilma-allen
Download Presentation

Organizational Learning to Integrate Sustainability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Organizational Learning to Integrate Sustainability Bernd Siebenhüner/Marlen Arnold OldenburgUniversity GELENA Research Group Social Learning and Sustainability Oldenburg University www.gelena.net

  2. Agenda • Background • Framework • Findings • Consequences www.gelena.net

  3. Background: Claims for Learning in Concepts of Sustainable Business • Triple bottom line (Bowden, et al. 2001, Elkington 1997), • Company oriented sustainability (COSY) (Schneidewind 1994, Schneidewind, et al. 1997), • Corporate social responsibility (European Commission 2002, Ruggie 2002,Clarkson 1995) • Corporate sustainability (Dyllick, Hockerts 2002, Gladwin, et al. 1995, Schaltegger, et al. 2003, Shrivastava, Hart 1995a, Welford 1997) www.gelena.net

  4. Background: Implications • Many claims for the need of organisational learning towards sustainable development • Little empirical knowledge in the field • Attempt to focus on less researched influencing factors of organisational learning • Research of organisational handling of businesses • in 3 business fields: Mobility, Housing & Construction, Information & Communication Technologies www.gelena.net

  5. Framework: Sustainable Learning Defining Organisational Learning towards Sustainable Development • Changes in organisational routines, activities, and communication... • that result from changes in organisational knowledge and value base, • that address sustainable development • that lead to actual improvements www.gelena.net

  6. Framework: Forms of Learning and Changes • Single-loop learning: • Adaptive learning, changes in operations and outputs • Error correction, strategies, culture and values remain unchanged • Double-loop learning: • Strategies and values are changed/transformed • Often reflexive process • Incremental changes: • Adjustments in product and process designs • Additive technologies, limited adaptations • Radical changes: • New or far-reached changed processes, products and services • New forms of satisfying given needs www.gelena.net

  7. Conceptual Framework • External Influences • Market pressures • Public/stakeholder demands • Legal & technological requirements • Consultants • Structure • Hierarchical structures • Staff & job rotation • Reflexive mechanisms • Culture • Values and norms • Communication • Leadership styles • Conflicts Organisational Learning: Single-loop learning Double-loop learning • Behaviour • Change agents • Intrapreneure www.gelena.net

  8. Our Study • Case studies of 6 German medium-sized and large corporations • 3-6 interviews in each company, personal visit and additional telephone interviews • Period: between May and October 2004 • Interviews with management, sustainability department and research & development department • Additional questionnaire www.gelena.net

  9. Framework: Our Sample • Criteria • Sustainability related changes in product or process designs (successful/positive examples) • Stakeholder integration (dialogues, participating concepts) • General sustainability strategies with observable effects • Success stories in the fields of: • Mobility (1 medium-sized businesses, 1 large company) • Housing & Construction (2 medium-sized businesses) • Information & Communication Technologies (2 large companies) www.gelena.net

  10. Process Results Single-loop Learning Double-loop Learning Incremental changes Large company (Mobility) Large company (I&C), Large company (I&C) Radical changes 2 SMB (H&C), SMB (Mobility) Findings: Learning • Medium-size businesses have a higher potential for radical change than large companies • Double and single loop learning observed in both groups www.gelena.net

  11. Findings: Influencing Factors Structure: • Seize is important for the range of changes or results • Staff factors had barely influence • Reflexive mechanisms • Housing & construction companies: • target-driven learning mechanism • formal communication (manual, trainings) and top-down diffusion of new knowledge • Companies I&C: • well structured research & development processes drive learning and innovation • project and team work, platforms • Mobility companies: • guideline-driven learning processes • flexible organisational structure, self-organized teams www.gelena.net

  12. Findings: Influencing Factors (2) Organisational culture: • Culture matters for learning • Large firms: „good German corporate governance“: • stakeholder demands are taken seriously • companies in fear of loss of reputation • elaborate sustainability reporting schemes • Medium-size firms: management commitment crucial for „sustainability culture“ • Conflicts often occurred between economic (market) demands and sustainability objectives www.gelena.net

  13. Findings: Influencing Factors (3) Behavioural factors: • change agents played in most cases an important role combined with a participatory culture of decision making • Medium-size firms: change agents were in management functions • Large firms: Change agents mostly in sustainability units or R&D departments (I&C) External factors: • Stakeholder pressures in case of large firms highly relevant • Markets often hindering than supportive of sustainability initiatives • Contacts to external research institutions (e.g. universities) promoted sustainability initiatives • Legal requirements partly support sustainability changes www.gelena.net

  14. Conclusions • Proactive sustainable learning is impossible without „intrapreneurial“ change agents • Organisational structures are necessary to pass and implement information, knowledge and learning effects into the organization • Structural provisions do not suffice • Cultural factors no sufficient explanation for radical changes • Paradox: The higher the penetration of sustainable learning effects into the organization is the more a firm needs internal maintenance. (leadership, structure, …) • Management commitment essential, in particular in SMB • Transparency and publicity will be needed to allow stakeholders to monitor firm activities www.gelena.net

  15. Consequences • Large firms: need new institutions to implement the learning effects as well as new structures to anchor the learning effects deeply into the organization •  focus not only on platforms, but on human resource development: team work, project work • SMB: need new organizational structures to bundle and codify knowledge •  focus on platforms (codifying and transferring knowledge) • Change agents (Manager) with a high sustainable orientation is not enough, there is also a cooperative leadership necessary (internal participation (transferring and integrating knowledge) • How to develop markets towards sustainability from consumer and producer sides? www.gelena.net

  16. Thank you for listening! www.gelena.net

More Related