1 / 40

Earthquake Impacts - THE Midwest Threat

Earthquake Impacts - THE Midwest Threat. Gregory L. Hempen, PhD, PE, RG Geophysicist (retired, St. Louis District) URS Corporation, St. Louis Office SAME Regional Conference, 5 OCT 06. Natural Hazard Issues. natural hazards: eqks, ... our special Midwest problems

wing-summers
Download Presentation

Earthquake Impacts - THE Midwest Threat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Earthquake Impacts -THE Midwest Threat Gregory L. Hempen, PhD, PE, RG Geophysicist (retired, St. Louis District) URS Corporation, St. Louis Office SAME Regional Conference, 5 OCT 06

  2. Natural Hazard Issues • natural hazards: eqks, ... • our special Midwest problems • sustained-design environment • risk acceptance • probabilities of extremes

  3. Earthquakes - Where? When? No Advance Warning! • Tornadoes are more common in the Midwest, but impact far less area. • Some equivalence with other rapidly developing hazards: high wind threats, seismic related hazards (liquefaction, lateral spreading, slope instability), terrorism, … • An all-hazards approach is best.

  4. Where? Epicenters & Sources EQE International Inc.

  5. 20 APR 02, ML 5.1, Plattsburgh NY Earthquake

  6. 10 SEP 06, M 5.8, Gulf of Mexico Earthquake USGS

  7. CENTRAL US SOURCE ZONES

  8. When? • Multiple timeframes & reference sets. • For a future earthquake: • When will the earthquake occur? What year? • How long will the earthquake last? • One big earthquake, right? • Emergency response, response, recovery: • When will emergency help arrive? • How long will response take? • How long will recovery take? To get back to “normal?”

  9. New Madrid Seismic Zone • Commerce-Benton Hills • East Prairie Limb, NMSZ • M: a 8.1, b 8.1, c 7.2 • Reel-foot Thrust Limb, NMSZ • M: a 8.0, b 8.0, c 8.0 • Blytheville Arch Limb, NMSZ • M: a 7.8, b 7.0, c 7.8 Tuttle, et al, 2002 • a 1811 – 1812 AD • b 1450 AD • c 900 AD

  10. When relative to the hazard? • When will the earthquake occur? • Large events recur about every 550 years (Cramer, 2006). • Intraplate strains and energy release by the magnitude scale suggests a M6 event perhaps every 50 years. • M6, 70 - 90 yr; M7, 250 - 500 yr; M8, 550 – 1,200 yr (Rogers, 2005). Overdue for M6; M7 possible. • How long will the earthquake shaking last? • 60 sec, M8; 30 sec, M7; 18 sec, M6 (Krinitzsky & Chang, 1977). • One big earthquake, right? • No, likely a foreshock with one or more main events within days to months (several references).

  11. When for response issues? • When will emergency help arrive for the public? • Hours to days later, depending upon event size, location within the damaged area, and government preparation. [Supplies for 7 days.] • How long will response take? • Weeks to months, depending upon extent of the event’s damage and government preparation. • How long will recovery take to get back to “normal?” • M6 recovery will take months to get back to some normalcy. M7 and larger will have long-term effects and may never return to present economic conditions.

  12. No Advance Warning! • Even a M6.5 to 7.0 in the Midwest will be a devastating and society-changing event. There may be no warning at all. • Even the 1993 Mississippi flooding is a poor model for earthquake damage. • Hurricane Katrina is a more similar analogy in the wide spread damage to structures and lifelines (dominantly levee, electrical transmission, and telephone systems). • 1900 Galveston Hurricane, 1954 Hurricane Hazel & 1966 Hurricane Inez, having practically no warning but wide spread devastation, compare better to a large earthquake in the Eastern US.

  13. Special Central US Concerns • Complacency • Preparedness • Similarities to Katrina Disaster • Use of Eqk Codes • Low attenuation • Great area of significant ground shaking • Dispersion – long/tall structure impacts • Liquefaction / Lateral Spreading and Foundation impacts

  14. CA & CENTRAL US MMI

  15. Structures & Risks • Significant ground motion at greater distance. • Due to dispersion of the waves, distant structures may be placed into resonance. • Long or tall structures are particularly susceptible to resonance effects. • More distant towns: tall buildings in Chicago; bridges across major rivers; dams; pipelines. • Evaluation of geotechnical issues: activation of slides, liquefaction/lateral spreading, bearing capacity, differential settlement.

  16. New Madrid Seismic Zone • Commerce-Benton Hills • East Prairie Limb, NMSZ • M: a 8.1, b 8.1, c 7.2 • Reel-foot Thrust Limb, NMSZ • M: a 8.0, b 8.0, c 8.0 • Blytheville Arch Limb, NMSZ • M: a 7.8, b 7.0, c 7.8 Tuttle, et al, 2002 • a 1811 – 1812 AD • b 1450 AD • c 900 AD

  17. Infrastructure - Dams & LeveesWappapello’s 2002 High-Water Event Emergency Overflow Spillway Outlet Works & Tunnel Embankment Dam with flat slopes & crest road Designed in the 1930’s & completed in 1941, its defensive measures are the dam’s stiff, gravelly clay, wide embankment base, & high freeboard.

  18. SUSTAINED DESIGN – Integration of the Hazard • Hazard assessment • Acceptance of risk OR mitigation of risk OR lessening of project requirements • Risk to be mitigated • Design to be resolved

  19. HAZARD versus RISK • Hazard - an occurrence that imperils life or property [assessed by science]. • Risk - quantification of a known hazard to an inventory (of life or property) that is vulnerable [mitigated by engineering]; the risk may be apportioned between acceptance of or mitigation of the hazard [distributed by the owner’s policy].

  20. SITE & HAZARD ASSESSMENT • Earthquake sources and seismicity • Travel path parameters • Static & dynamic parameters of earth systems (naturally placed, not designed) • Site response analysis • Other hazard impacts • Engineering designs to abate the hazards’ risk and meet the projects’ requirements

  21. SEISMIC DAMAGE TYPES • Fault displacement (rupture) • Ground motion (induced inertia) • Indirect Physical Impacts • Tectonic Changes (seiches / tsunamis) • Liquefaction • Triggering Landslides • Foundation Failures (Diffrt’l Settlement) • Tertiary Lifeline Impacts

  22. IMPACTED EPICENTRAL DISTANCES (km)

  23. CODES - Seismic Provisions of the 2003 IBC • Sections 1613 through 1616 of the 2003 • IBC pertain to Earthquake Loads on structures with rules for exceptions, existing structure additions, occupancy, alterations, QA, & wind. • Design spectral response acceleration, SA, is specified from • Mapped bedrock acc [Eqk Source Region]: SS & S1, • Site Class Determination [Site Assessment] – T 1615.1.1, • Site Class Coefficients - T 1615.1.2(1&2), & • The structure’s fundamental period, T, in s.

  24. OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS(not only the ground motion value) • Fault displacement • Tectonic Changes [seiches (waves) / tsunamis] • Foundation Impacts • Dynamic Bearing Capacity • Differential Settlement • Liquefaction (Flow Liq, Cyc Mobility, Cyc Liq) • Triggering Landslides • Tertiary Lifeline or Project Subsystem Impacts

  25. Probabilities of Extremes • Standard statistical assessments have been used. Earthquakes are not independent events. • Stresses within the plate increase in time so the risk increases with time. • Statistics of once or more occurrences. • 2% exceedance in 50 years (x>1 in 2,450-year period).

  26. Statistics for the Uncommon • Earthquake swarms: several events in one area • Foreshocks & Aftershocks use little of the main event’s energy • New Madrid Series, 1811-12, within 8 months: • 3 or 4 Great (?) Earthquakes • 10 – 15 Large Earthquakes • Scores of Major Earthquakes

  27. Actions for Earthquakes • For your awareness, you can improve your survivability and your resources’ sustainability. • Earthquake Preparation • During an Earthquake • Earthquake Recovery

  28. Earthquake Preparation • Learn first aid, • have water, food and supplies for three days, • prepare the structure/community for eqk, • know what to do when we feel an eqk, • have a plan to meet at a specific place after an earthquake occurs, and • have an earthquake drill.

  29. During an Earthquake • When inside, stay inside at a protective location: door way, corner or beneath a sturdy table. Drop, cover, and hold. Try to be away from windows. • When outside, stay outside. Try to get away from tall buildings and overhead utilities. • In a car when an eqk is recognized, slow and pull off at a safe location.

  30. Earthquake Recovery • Aid those nearby, • stay at a secure place until it is okay to go home, • go to your meeting place, • do not go sight-seeing, and • expect other earthquakes, called aftershocks.

  31. SUMMARY • Earthquakes should be regarded as a significant and special hazards, particularly near the New Madrid Seismic Zone. • Designs for many structures need to consider the acceptable earthquake risk. • Seismic Ground Motion appraisal may be developed from accepted code procedures. • Other seismic foundation impacts for the site should be considered. • Be aware of individual actions before, during and after earthquakes.

More Related