Exploring the Pros and Cons Should Modi Consider Privatizing the IAS

1. Exploring the Pros and Cons: Should Modi Consider Privatizing the IAS?" In recent years, there has been a growing momentum toward the implementation of lateral recruitment within the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In 2018, the government initiated the recruitment process for 10 joint secretary-level positions, which garnered an overwhelming response of approximately 6,000 applicants. However, the progress in this regard has been relatively sluggish, resulting in only 38 lateral recruitments being conducted by 2022. It is important to note that these recruitments have encountered significant opposition from the lobby of IAS officers. Now, let's examine three arguments in favor of lateral recruitment in the IAS: Lack of Specialization: One argument put forth is that the generalist nature of IAS officers may impede their ability to effectively handle the diverse range of responsibilities entrusted to them. It is often observed that IAS officers, with backgrounds in various fields such as history, could be assigned to manage an entire district and subsequently be tasked with formulating policies for industries like shipping or the Ministry of Earth Sciences. Critics raise concerns regarding whether IAS officers possess the necessary qualifications and expertise to make well-informed decisions on complex subjects. Acknowledging the need for specialization in policy-making, the government's document titled "Strategy for New India @ 75" highlights the importance of the lateral entry of professionals into government service. Shortage of IAS Officers: India has been facing a significant shortage of IAS officers, with fewer recruitments since liberalization. As the tasks and complexity of the government’s functionalities have grown, it resulted in more IAS officers being recruited in different departments. However, the

2. recruitment of new officers has not matched the demand. There is a visible demand and supply gap that government is not able to fulfill. in Many European nations recruit civil servants through open advertisements, which India could consider adopting. Lateral recruitment could help address this shortage by bringing in qualified professionals from diverse backgrounds. Lack of Accountability: Critics argue that the current system lacks accountability and incentivizes complacency among IAS officers. Promotions are based on fixed timelines, irrespective of an officer's performance, and it is practically impossible to be fired from the service. This system may hinder the development of expertise and creativity among IAS officers. Introducing lateral recruitment would introduce competition among IAS officers, encouraging them to demonstrate their competency and suitability for higher positions. However, there are counterarguments against lateral recruitment: Favoritism and Nepotism: Introducing lateral recruitment could potentially open the door to favoritism and nepotism within the bureaucracy. The current system of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) exams is designed to be fair and transparent, with candidates selected based on merit. Deviating from this system could risk compromising the integrity of the bureaucracy. Political Interference:

3. Allegations of political interference have already arisen in the context of lateral recruitment. Central agencies like the CBI, ED, and CVC have been accused of favoring candidates who align with their political or ideological interests. The bureaucracy should remain independent and insulated from political influence to ensure its effectiveness and neutrality. Need for Generalists: Some argue that while domain expertise is crucial in certain positions, senior-level positions in the bureaucracy require broader administrative experience and constitutional knowledge. Specialists may have a narrow focus and may lack the wider perspective necessary for such positions. A balance between domain expertise and generalist skills is essential to ensure effective governance. While lateral recruitment in the IAS can bring valuable domain expertise and address the shortage of officers, it should be implemented cautiously to prevent backdoor entries and maintain the motivation of existing IAS officers. The government needs to strike a balance between specialization and generalist skills, ensuring merit-based selection and maintaining the integrity and independence of the bureaucracy. Check out for more : https://www.youtube.com/@wiseupwithanubhav