1 / 15

Comprehensive Analysis of Benefits for Electricity Storage Projects in the PCI Process

This study provides advice on analyzing benefits of electricity storage in the PCI context, encompassing common benefits, quantification options, stakeholder consultations, mapping to CBA indicators, and robustness assessments. The approach demonstrated is applied to PCI candidates, contributing towards CBA methodology enhancement. Tasks include mapping benefit itemization, stakeholder engagement, and data-to-indicators alignment. Specific focus on societal value drivers and robustness for PCI candidates. Stakeholder collaboration essential for final proposal. Contact for further engagement.

wojcik
Download Presentation

Comprehensive Analysis of Benefits for Electricity Storage Projects in the PCI Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment methodology for the benefits of electricity storage projects for the PCI process TEN-E RG meeting 21-22 January 2019 Edwin Haesen Assoc. Director Energy Systems & Markets

  2. EC initiative to launch this study Objective • Advice on approaches for a comprehensive analysis of benefits of electricity storage in PCI context Scope • List of common benefits, incl. indicator definition, quantification options and data needs • Not technology specific • Special attention to sub-hour domain • All in line with Reg. (EU) 347/2013 and ENTSO-E CBA methodology Engagement • Stakeholder consultation on best practices of assessment / data • Reporting in TEN-E RG meetings Outcome • Approach demonstrated for candidates of 4th PCI list • Contribution to CBA methodology and implementation guidance for future TYNDP/PCI processes

  3. Study approach Task 3 Data mapping to CBA indicators Task 1 Mapping of CBA approaches Task 2 Stakeholder engagement Review Approach Data Shortlist of societal value drivers Mapping of storage value propositions Industry associations, promoters Data mapping State of the art quantification approaches Map to CBA2.0 indicators and approach Gap analysis TSOs ENTSO-E, national Application PCI candidates Robustness & consistency Model/data needs Authorities EC, ACER Consultation (tbc) Conclusion April 2019 Kick-off early January 2019

  4. Task 1 – Mapping of CBA approaches • Consolidation of integrated benefit itemization and assessment frameworks • Storage and other smart/flexible solutions • Review of various types of quantification methods (simple and complex) • Mapped to TEN-E objectives and applicable CBA methodology, leading to a gap analysis • Suggestion for how to handle presently missing or unclear benefits Task description Mapping of storage value propositions State of the art quantification approaches Map to CBA2.0 indicators and approach Gap analysis Model/data needs Output • Overview of typical (large-scale) electricity storage propositions with • relevant assessment methodologies (including data needs) • mapping with the CBA2.0 approach • draft proposal for how to close possible gaps in the CBA2.0 based assessments in a pragmatic but robust way with available public data.

  5. Task 2 – Stakeholder engagement • Base information from TYNDP assessments, PCI application process, and earlier stakeholder/ENTSO-E/ACER statements • Request for interviews with all electricity storage PCI applicants, preferable early February • Engagement with other relevant organizations incl. EASE, EC/JRC, ENTSO-E • Consulting on suggestions for relevant assessment approach and reference data (complementing Task 1) • Views from RG members are appreciated Task description Review Approach Data Industry associations, promoters TSOs ENTSO-E, national Authorities EC, ACER Output • Report with agreed meeting notes of all stakeholder interactions including • mapping of the various stakeholder views vis-à-vis the identified value drivers and CBA2.0 gaps • their suggestions for methodology improvements and data delivery.

  6. Task 3 – Mapping of data to CBA indicators • Based on Task 1 & 2, develop set of indicators in line with TEN-E regulation and CBA method, as complete as possible and reasonable • No new studies/modelling foreseen • Aim to have a workable approach to test positive net benefit of applicants and allow for possible prioritization • For EC and RGs to consider in 4th PCI ranking process, based on available CBAs and public robust data • Progress discussion with RG in March • Final proposal for RG in April Task description Shortlist of societal value drivers Data mapping Application PCI candidates Robustness & consistency Consultation (tbc) Output • Assessment of electricity storage projects PCI candidates. This is based on available TYNDP assessments and additional values drivers which are quantified based on public information. This is consulted with stakeholders and experts. The outcome is fit for purpose for the EC to use in its PCI process. • Recommendations are given for a CBA methodology update for electricity storage projects in line with the present TEN-E guideline.

  7. Project Planning Methodology progress Kick-off announcement Final proposal

  8. Further engagement • Outreach to PCI storage applicants and other organizations is being planned • For other questions and suggestions, please contact • EC: sebastian.gras@ec.europa.eu • Project team: edwin.haesen@navigant.com • Update anddiscussion in next TEN-E RG meetings

  9. Annex

  10. Navigant at a glance

  11. NAVIGANT’S SUCCESS DRAWS FROM experienced professional advisors worldwide

  12. ATTRACTIVE DEMAND ENVIRONMENT Each of the segments we serve is going through significant transformation, creating demand for the solutions we offer. ENERGY HEALTHCARE • Technology change: renewables, distributed generation, storage • Grid modernization and resilience • Energy efficiency regulation • Healthcare reform • Reimbursement changes • Evolving value-based care models • Life sciences global commercialization • Industry consolidation FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY AND COMPLIANCE • Financial services compliance requirements • Public and regulatory focus on financial crimes • Tightening capital requirements

  13. Navigant’s Global energy practice We collaborate with clients to help them thrive in a rapidly changing environment. • 50 largest electric and gas utilities • 20 largest independent power generators • 20 largest gas distribution and pipeline companies • Leading oil & gas companies • International, federal, and state government organizations • Multiple new energy market entrants and investors CLIENTS • Industry’s largest energy management consulting team • Consultants average 15 years of experience • 60% have an advanced degree • Over 50% have an engineering degree TEAM • Among Top 10 in Vault’s 2017 Best Consulting Firms for Energy • Named "Best Advisory – Renewable Energy" in 9th and 10th Annual Environmental Finance and Carbon Finance Market Surveys NAME

  14. Energy’s Global transformation offerings ENERGY AND CAPITAL MARKETS • ENERGY CLOUD TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION OFFERINGS • TECHNOLOGY • INNOVATION • AND MANAGEMENT • SUSTAINABILITY • SOLUTIONS • ENERGY SYSTEM • TRANSFORMATION • CLEAN ENERGY • PROGRAMS

  15. Contacts

More Related