240 likes | 253 Views
Learn about conditional statements in discrete structures, including truth values, counterexamples, contrapositives, and inverses.
E N D
Conditional StatementsCS 2312, Discrete Structures II Poorvi L. Vora, GW
Conditional Statement A implies B A => B If A then B A is the hypothesis; B the conclusion Example: If x is a prime larger than 2 then x is odd A: “x is a prime number larger than 2” B: “x is odd” • Generally, the truth of the conditional statement is a function of one or more variables; in this case, x. • This example statement is true for all values of x.
Truth value a function of variables Generally speaking, the truth value of a statement depends on variables. For example, consider the inequality: 0 ≤ n3≤ Bn2 • Whether it is true or not depends on the values of the variables: n and B • There are quite likely value of n and B for which it is true, as well as values for which it is false
: for every Consider a modification of the previous example: 0 ≤ n3≤ Bn2 n ≥ b The truth value of this inequality is now a function ofBand b On fixing b and B, • If it is untrue for a single value of n ≥ b then the statement is false • If it is true n ≥ b then it is true • Thus the truth is not dependent on n
Counterexample Sometimes you may have statement that is false: x is divisible by 4 even integers x The way to show it is false is to show that the statement is not true “ even integers x” one even integer for which it is false is enough. However, this does not mean that x is not divisible by 4 even integers x
Counterexample, contd The statement “xis divisible by 4” is sometimes true and sometimes false Thus neither of the statements below is true, because there are counterexamples for both: • x is divisible by 4 even integers x • x is not divisible by 4 even integers x
: There exists Sometimes you may be asked to show that there exist values of variables such that a statement is true. Continuing the previous example: • B, b > 0 such that 0 ≤ n3≤ Bn2 n ≥ b One way of proving above is to • find one value of b, B and • show that the inequality is true for these values.
How and and change a statement Consider the statement: “xis divisible by 6” Its truth depends on the value of x Adding or can eliminate the dependence on x to allow you to say definitively whether the statement is true or false: xsuch that x divisible by 6: True • odd x such that x is divisible by 6: False x is divisible by 6 integers x that are multiples of 12: True xis divisible by 6 integers x: False
The truth table of A=>B We want to know the truth value of A => B Note: statement makes no claims when A is false. • when A is false, the statement is true independent of the value of B
Negation or Counterexample Examining the statement A(x) => B(x) x (where both A and B are functions of x) • If you think it is true, you need to provide a proof. • Begin with the assumption A(x) is true and show B(x) is true. • If you think it is false, you could provide a counterexample. • Exactly one example of the variable which makes A true but B false. • Notice that providing an example where B is true but A false gives you nothing at all • because the statement is making no claims when A is false. don’t care
A Counterexample Suppose you are presented with the conditional statement: integers x, if 2 divides x then 4 divides x What is a valid counterexample? Are there values of x for which the statement is true?
Converse Given: A => B The converse is B => A Does it follow? Example: If x is a prime larger than 2 then x is odd What is the converse? Does it follow?
Proving the converse does not prove the main statement Suppose you have to show A => B And you begin with B to show A You have not shown A => B You have shown B => A
Examples of incorrect proofs To show that If 2 divides x, then 4 divides x (this is not true, but examples of incorrect proofs will conclude it is) Example 1: Suppose 4 divides x. Then x = 4q (for q the quotient when 4 divides x). Hence x is even and 2 divides x. Incorrect! Why?
Examples of incorrect proofs, contd. To show that If 2 divides x, then 4 divides x (this is not true, but examples of incorrect proofs will conclude it is) Example 2: Suppose 2 divides x. Then x = 2q1 Suppose 4 divides x. Then x = 4q2 x = x => 2q1 = 4q2 => q1 = 2q2 LHS = RHS Incorrect! Why?
Contrapositive One can show A=> B by assuming A is true and showing that then B is true OR by assuming that B is not true and showing that then A is not true. That is, by showing: not B => not A Which is the contrapositive Which is logically equivalent to A => B
Why is the contrapositive equivalent to the original statement? Consider the truth table
Inverse not A => not B Is this related to the original statement? The converse? The contrapositive? It is the contrapositive of the converse
Summary Conditional Statement: A => B • Converse: B => A • Contrapositive: not B => not A • Inverse: not A => not B • Counterexample: an example of A and not B
Necessary and Sufficient A => B A sufficient for B B => A A necessary for B A <=> B A is necessary and sufficient for B B is necessary and sufficient for A
Bidirectional If and only if (iff) If A then B ANDIf B then A A <=> B A iff B A and B are equivalent statements
False Premise, Valid Argument, False Conclusion Claim: If 0 + 1 = 0 then 2=0 Proof: Begin with correct statement: 2 = 0 + 1 + 1 => 2 = (0+1)+1 = 0+1=0
Valid Premise, Invalid Argument, Valid Conclusion gives zero credit Assume: If 4 divides x then 2 divides x Show that 4 divides 16 Invalid proof: 2 divides 16. Hence, applying assumption, 4 divides 16.
Proof by Contradiction To show A=> B Recall, if A is not true, you cannot determine anything. Assume A is true. Suppose B is not. Then show there is a contradiction. That is, B has to be true.