1 / 16

INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY BRIEFING TO: Deputy Garrison Commanders Conference COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT (CLS) OVERVIE

INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY BRIEFING TO: Deputy Garrison Commanders Conference COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT (CLS) OVERVIEW 25 APRIL 2005 Mr. Philip E. Sakowitz, Jr. Principal Deputy Director, IMA.

wyatt
Download Presentation

INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY BRIEFING TO: Deputy Garrison Commanders Conference COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT (CLS) OVERVIE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY BRIEFING TO: Deputy Garrison Commanders Conference COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT (CLS) OVERVIEW 25 APRIL 2005 Mr. Philip E. Sakowitz, Jr. Principal Deputy Director, IMA Our Mission - provide equitable, effective and efficient management of Army installations worldwide to support mission readiness and execution, enable the Well-being of Soldiers, civilians and family members, improve the Army’s aging infrastructure and preserve our environment. Leading Change for Installation Excellence

  2. INTENT OF CLS • Method for ensuring the delivery of high quality base operations support services within the funds available to the army yielding: • Consistency and predictability in service delivery across Army installations worldwide • Equitable funding distribution to Army garrisons • Visibility of affordable and non-affordable support programs • Performance metrics for each service support program to consistently measure every garrison

  3. Method INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PHASES PHASE 1: SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAMS (SATs) PHASE 2: VALIDATION OF SAT RESULTS PHASE 3: VALIDATION OF COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT DECISION SUPPORT TOOL Completed Phases 1-3 for 54 Services Developed by stakeholders and functional experts

  4. SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAM (SAT) PROCESS SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAM MEMBERS HQDA PROPONENTS, IMA FUNCTIONALS, GARRISONS, MACOMs/ICs, CONSTITUENTS • SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAMS IDENTIFIED SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS Community Information Services Installation Volunteer Management PRIORITIZED SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS Army Family Action Plan Family Advocacy Program IDENTIFIED % OF SERVICE COST Mobilization & Deployment Support Army Family Team Building DEVELOPED PERFORMANCE MEASURE TARGETS 1 Financial Readiness Spouse Employment Relocation Readiness Exceptional Family Member Program Army Community Services SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS(SSPs)

  5. MUST FUND PRES BUD DECISION SUPPORT TOOL Army Community Services

  6. ESTABLISHING SSP PRIORITIES • SSPs IDENTIFIED AS • MUST FUND • Required by law • Providing foundation functions and skill sets for minimum level of service management (i.e.,“open the doors”) • Yielding service failure if not provided (i.e., the “breakpoint”) • OR • DISCRETIONARY • Prioritized according to impact on Projecting Power, Readiness, and Well Being • Direct Impact on Mission • Indirect Impact on Mission • Peripheral Impact on Mission

  7. NEW YORK 24/7 ADAPTABILITY Basic Standard – Predictable & Efficient MAINE GERMANY 7/24 ADAPTABLE

  8. Method COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT RESULTS 54 services 373 service support programs (SSPs) 246 SSPs identified as must fund 127 discretionary SSPs scored & prioritized CLS provides the detail to articulate funding shortfalls

  9. FUNDING IMPACTS IMA FLEX - LIMITED TO MOVING FACILITIES/INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINMENT FUNDING TO FUND SERVICES SRM – Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization (Facilities & Infrastructure) BOS – Base Operations Support

  10. REPROGRAMMING IMPACTS ON FACILITIES RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT 40% RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT 74% RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT 61% RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT 94% Point: Current underfunding leads to C4 Facilities

  11. THE WAY AHEAD Phase 1: FY05 is a Planning Year Phase 2: FY06 - Initial Implementation Phase 3: FY07 - Full Implementation

  12. THE WAY AHEADFY05 – PLANNING YEAR • We will adjust the CLS Model to Version 2.0 in preparation for FY06 funding decision using this approach • Step I – Analyze Implementation Plans • Analyze Garrison CLS implementation plans for adjustments to SSP cost, definitions • Incorporate some SMC-identified exceptions into CLS Model • Step II – Conduct SATs • Refine performance measures • Re-look selected services • Analyze selected deferred services • Step III – Complete CLS Model/Review Exceptions • IMA Senior Executive Leadership (SEL) will score SSPs – result is CLS "Version 2.0" • EXCOM Working Group recommends disposition of (non-incorporated) exceptions

  13. Aug 05 Sep 05 Jul 05 - Sep 05 Conduct CLS Decisions for FY 06 IMBOD notified of FY06/07 outcomes Deliberate strategic communication on CLS to stakeholders THE WAY AHEADFY05 – PLANNING YEAR (cont.)

  14. THE WAY AHEADFY06 – INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION • Garrisons provided with • Revised FY 06/07 funding targets • Initial implementation guidance by Service, by SSP • Garrisons execute funded SSPs • Migrate away from delivering non-funded SSPs

  15. THE WAY AHEADFY07 – FULL IMPLEMENTATION • People moved in coordination with Standard Garrison Organization and CLS • Dollars aligned with Service and SSP • Measure & evaluate performance through • Activity Based Costing • Performance Management Review

  16. INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY “Sustain, Support and Defend”

More Related