1 / 10

Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for:

Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for:. Broadband synthetic time histories versus strong-motion data. Broadband synthetic time histories from different methodologies.

wylie-mathews
Download Presentation

Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for: • Broadband synthetic time histories versus strong-motion data • Broadband synthetic time histories from different methodologies

  2. Kim B. Olsen and John E. Mayhew: Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, with Application to the 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, Califonia, Earthquake, Seismological Research Letters 80(6): 1002-1007

  3. GOF Approach: Combination of Different Metrics Time-domain Metrics: Cross-Correlation (Waveform Comparison) Peak Acceleration (PGA) Peak Velocity (PGV) Peak Displacement (PGD) Cumulative Energy Spectral Metrics: Smoothed Fourier Amplitude Amplitudes Average Response Spectra (0.1-10s) Spectral Accelerations at NGA Periods Duration at Selected Periods Inelastic/Elastic Ratios (I/E)

  4. The Goodness-of-fit Scale 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Try Again 1 2 3

  5. Visual Confirmation of GOF Values GOFPGV=82 GOFPGV=19 GOFFS=51 GOFFS=11 GOFRS=75 GOFRS=14

  6. Redundancy of Metrics Correlation Matrix (33 stations)

  7. Weights • User supplies a list of weights (wi) • Normalized weights are applied to each metric GOF value (m i) for the overall site and component GOF values

  8. Example of GOF Estimation for Mw 5.4 Chino Hills

  9. New: map-based GOF PGA IE 0.2-0.5s SA-0.2s IE 0.75-2.5s SA-2s IE 2-5s

  10. IE ratios derived from data (gray) and synthetics (black) for the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake. Dots are results from 33 stations, and the solid lines are the corresponding mean values.

More Related