1 / 17

PANEL: Rethinking the First Statistics Course for Math Majors

PANEL: Rethinking the First Statistics Course for Math Majors. Joint Statistical Meetings, 8/11/04 Allan Rossman Beth Chance Cal Poly – San Luis Obispo. Course/Program/Students.

Download Presentation

PANEL: Rethinking the First Statistics Course for Math Majors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PANEL: Rethinking the First Statistics Course for Math Majors Joint Statistical Meetings, 8/11/04 Allan Rossman Beth Chance Cal Poly – San Luis Obispo

  2. Course/Program/Students • Dickinson College: Two course sequence in prob and math stat, not required for math major but could count as elective, calc prereq • Developed new introductory course in data analysis for math majors • UOP: One semester course for math and engineering majors, probability with applications to statistics, calc prereq • Changed textbook and focus of course

  3. Course/Program/Students • Cal Poly: Two course sequence (probability then statistics) for math, statistics, CS, and engineering majors (only first quarter required), calc prereq • Infusion of activities, data, and applications to statistics into both courses • New statistics course emphasizing the statistical process and introducing probability “just in time” • New curricular materials, instructional technology • Experimental courses for prospective math teachers, science majors

  4. Why Metamorphosis? • First course, not “math stat” course • Need complete overhaul, not “tweaking” • Goals are fundamentally different • New course consistent with Ginger’s points • Including successful features from “Stat 101” • Focus on process of statistical investigations • Not separate pieces • Students investigate entire process over and over in new situations

  5. Example 1: Friendly Observers • Psychology experiment • Butler and Baumeister (1998) studied the effect of observer with vested interest on skilled performance • How often would such an extreme experimental difference occur by chance, if there was no vested interest effect?

  6. Example 1: Friendly Observers • Students investigate this question through • Hands-on simulation (playing cards) • Computer simulation (Java applet) • Mathematical model • counting techniques

  7. Example 1: Friendly Observers • Focus on statistical process • Data collection, descriptive statistics, inferential analysis • Arising from genuine research study • Connection between the randomization in the design and the inference procedure used • Scope of conclusions depends on study design • Cause/effect inference is valid • Use of simulation motivates the derivation of the mathematical probability model • Investigate/answer real research questions in first two weeks

  8. Example 2: Sleep Deprivation • Physiology Experiment • Stickgold, James, and Hobson (2000) studied the long-term effects of sleep deprivation on a visual discrimination task (3 days later!) sleep condition n Mean StDev Median IQR deprived 11 3.90 12.17 4.50 20.7 unrestricted 10 19.82 14.73 16.55 19.53 • How often would such an extreme experimental difference occur by chance, if there was no sleep deprivation effect?

  9. 15.92 Example 2: Sleep Deprivation • Students investigate this question through • Hands-on simulation (index cards) • Computer simulation (Minitab) • Mathematical model p-value=.0072 p-value .002

  10. Example 2: Sleep Deprivation • Experience the entire statistical process again • Develop deeper understanding of key ideas (randomization, significance, p-value) • Tools change, but reasoning remains same • Tools based on research study, question – not for their own sake • Simulation as a problem solving tool • Empirical vs. exact p-values

  11. Example 3: Sleepless Drivers • Sociology case-control study • Connor et al (2002) investigated whether those in recent car accidents had been more sleep deprived than a control group of drivers

  12. Example 3: Sleepless Drivers • Sample proportion that were in a car crash • Sleep deprived: .581 • Not sleep deprived: .484 Odds ratio: 1.48 • How often would such an extreme observed odds ratio occur by chance, if there was no sleep deprivation effect?

  13. 1.48 Example 3: Sleepless Drivers • Students investigate this question through • Computer simulation (Minitab) • Empirical sampling distribution of odds-ratio • Empirical p-value • Approximate mathematical model

  14. Example 3: Sleepless Drivers • SE(log-odds) = • Confidence interval for population log odds: • sample log-odds +z* SE(log-odds) • Back-transformation • 90% CI for odds ratio: 1.05 – 2.08

  15. Example 3: Sleepless Drivers • Students understand process through which they can investigate statistical ideas • Students piece together powerful statistical tools learned throughout the course to derive new (to them) procedures • Concepts, applications, methods, theory

  16. Reference • Investigating Statistical Concepts, Applications, and Methods Preliminary Edition Duxbury Press www.rossmanchance.com/iscam/ • Slides at www.rossmanchance.com/jsm04/ • arossman@calpoly.edu, bchance@calpoly.edu

  17. Table of Contents • 1: Comparisons and Conclusions • 2: Comparisons with Quantitative Variables • 3: Sampling from Populations • 4: Models and Sampling Distributions • 5: Comparing Two Populations • 6: Comparing Several Populations, Exploring Relationships

More Related