1 / 30

Steps Required To Conduct Research Involving Human Subjects

Steps Required To Conduct Research Involving Human Subjects. APRIL 10, 2012 Series 2, Session 5 of AAPLS Jennifer Graf, Director, Institutional Review Board (IRB) Applicants & Administrators Preaward Luncheon Series. Goals for this Session. Explain what the role of the IRB office.

Download Presentation

Steps Required To Conduct Research Involving Human Subjects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Steps Required To Conduct Research Involving Human Subjects APRIL 10, 2012 Series 2, Session 5 of AAPLS Jennifer Graf, Director, Institutional Review Board (IRB) Applicants & Administrators Preaward Luncheon Series

  2. Goals for this Session • Explain what the role of the IRB office. • Discuss what research falls under its purview. • Explain the process of having research approved by the IRB, including post-approval responsibilities. • Discuss what IRB-related information is needed at the Just In Time phase of grant application.

  3. Nuremberg Trials: Nuremberg Code (1947) Tuskegee Syphilis research (1932-1972) • Thalidomide (1962)

  4. Jesse Gelsinger (2000) Ellen Roche (2001) 2001 VCU

  5. Henrietta Lacks(1951-early 1970s; book published 2010) Guatemala Syphilis Experiment (1946-1948; reported October 2010) Susan Reverby Wellesley College John C. Cutler, MD

  6. Applying Ethical Principles • Respect for Persons: Autonomy • Informed consent • Voluntary participation • Freedom to withdraw without penalty • Protect privacy and confidentiality • Beneficence: “Do unto others…” • Risks are minimized; Benefits are maximized • Risks are justified by potential benefits • Conflicts of interest are managed or eliminated • Justice: Distribute Risks and Benefits • Protection of vulnerable populations • Those who may benefit are not excluded

  7. IRB Determinations and Types of Review • Not Human Subject Research • Initial Review • Exempt • Expedited • Convened IRB • Continuing Review • Amendment/Revision • Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Unanticipated Problems • Other • Case reports Note: Students, fellows, etc., cannot be the PI of research at Tufts.

  8. Regulations and Policies • DHHS: 45 CFR 46 • FDA: 21 CFR 50, 56, 312, 812 • State: • Vary state to state • MA Fetal Research Statute • Be familiar with institutional policies

  9. Does Not Constitute Human Subject Research* • Certain coded or de-identified analyses • http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdebiol.html • Not to be determined by the Investigator • Provide a detailed letter of activities to the IRB; a written determination is • returned to the Principal Investigator • Quality Improvement/Assurance initiatives • Engaged in research: • http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/engage08.html • * Link to guidance document on IRB website.

  10. Exempt • (minimal risk) • Governed by 45 CFR 46.101(b) • 6 very specific categories • Request for Exemption form • Protocol, any documents given to subjects • PI’s COI disclosure form, others as indicated • Copy of the grant, if applicable • HIPAA documentation

  11. Expedited(minimal risk) • Governed by 45 CFR 46.110(b) – 9 specific categories • Form I • Protocol • Copy of the grant, if applicable • ICF(s) • PI’s COI disclosure form, others as indicated • Education requirements satisfied • Advertisement(s) • Questionnaires, cover letters, surveys, etc. • HIPAA documentation

  12. Database/Medical Record Review • Form VII – specifically designed for database and retrospective medical record review research. • May be exempt, may be expedited – depends on the data collected and the intervention (if any) with subjects. • Form VII is designed to eliminate the need for a separate protocol, ICF, and HIPAA documentation. • Best to complete the education requirements prior to submission.

  13. Convened IRB Review(greater than minimal risk) • Form I (all studies) • Form II (drug/compound) • Form III (device) • Form IV (research radiation) • Form VI • Tissue-banking • Optional TB ICF • PI’s COI disclosure form, others as indicated • Protocol/Site-Specific Appendix • ICF(s)/parent/guardian permission form/assent form • Advertisement(s) • Questionnaire(s), contact letters, surveys, etc. • Education requirements • HIPAA documentation • Copy of the grant, if applicable

  14. Special Populations: Contact the IRB office for guidance when preparing protocol/IRB application Pregnant women Neonates or fetuses Minors Decisionally impaired Prisoners Employees or staff Students

  15. Phases of Clinical Research Studies • Phase I: • metabolic & pharmacologic mechanisms; determine a safe dosage range; small group of people (e.g., 20-80); identify side effects. • Pose a high level of risk due to “initial introduction” of the test article into a human; little or no prior human experience. • Phase II: • controlled; preliminary effectiveness in subjects with the disease of interest; several hundred subjects; determine efficacy and further evaluate safety. Pose a high level of risk due to limited human experience. • Phase III: • controlled & uncontrolled; increased human exposure to the test article (several hundred to several thousand); seek safety & effectiveness data for extrapolation to a larger population; monitor adverse effects. • Phase IV: • conducted after intervention is marketed; long-term safety and efficacy data acquisition in a larger population; information about any Adverse Events associated with widespread use.

  16. PI Post-Approval Responsibilities • Report serious adverse events • Report unanticipated events • Continuing Review • Submit requests to change or amend the research for review and approval prior to initiating changes.

  17. Expedited and Exempt Reviewed by IRB Chair or Vice-Chair Clarification requested. PI submits additional information. Approval letter generated, signed and sent to the PI. IRB members notified.

  18. Convened IRB • Assigned to an IRB agenda • Assigned a Primary and Secondary Reviewer • Reviewed at a convened IRB meeting IRB comment letter sent to PI within 2 weeks of the meeting

  19. Principal Investigator responds to IRB review stipulations/requests for clarification: Submission is reviewed by “expedited review procedures. • If necessary, additional information, etc., • is requested from the PI. • Approval letter is generated, signed, and sent to the PI. • IRB members are notified.

  20. Helpful Tips For Submission Preparation • Ensure the protocol details all procedures. • Ensure the ICF is in simple language (8th grade reading level) • Proof read! And make sure all documents are present and required signatures are present. • Review information on the IRB website, use templates • If applicable, provide a copy of the grant • Provide requisite supporting documentation. • Provide tracked and untracked copies of revised documents; always include a version date or number on all documents. • Ensure education requirements are satisfied; retain copies of certificates of completion (subject to audit!) • COI form(s) complete and submitted, as needed.

  21. The Best Advise for a Quick and Successful IRB Review… PLAN IN ADVANCE • Review IRB website, get familiar with issues. • Discuss the project with other research-experienced faculty, develop a plan (and a protocol). • Call the IRB office – schedule an appointment to meet with a member of the office. • Speak with an IRB member.

  22. IRB Leadership • IRB Chair: Andreas K. Klein, MD • IRB Vice-Chairs: Susan Hadley, MD • Gordon Huggins, MD • Roman Schumann, MD • IRB Members are from more than 20 different divisions at Tufts MC and Tufts University, including TUSM, TUSDM, HNRCA, etc., non-scientists, and community representatives who are not affiliated with either institution.

  23. IRB office • Director, IRB Operations: Jennifer A. Graf • IRB Coordinators: Julie Morelli Novak (Red) Ashley D. Hicks (Blue) • Continuing Review Coordinators: Christine Choy (Blue) Andrew L. Simon (Red) • Assistant IRB Coordinator: Jesslyn Jamison • Administrative Assistants: Robert J. Santoro (PT) TBA (FT)

  24. IRB Office Box 817 (617) 636-7512 15 Kneeland Street, 1st floor http://tnemcirb.tufts.edu/

  25. Presenter Zoya Hamilton, CRA, EdD Sr. Associate Director Research Administration Office of the Vice Provost Tufts University zoya.hamilton@tufts.edu

  26. Externally-Funded Projects with Human Subjects • Sponsor agency requires confirmation that the project funded by the award is approved by Tufts IRB • This confirmation is necessary before the release of the funds by the agency (Just In Time – JIT) • If award is pass-through, the prime recipient requests a copy of the IRB approval letter with subcontract paperwork

  27. Communicating IRB Approval to Sponsor • Your Signing Official (SO) from the Office of Research Administration (ORA) will confirm the IRB approval to sponsor • SO will determine whether or not the sponsor requires a copy of the IRB letter or just the IRB approval date • NIH typically only requires the approval date unless the IRB letter is specifically requested • ORA requires a copy of the IRB approval letter in order to communicate the IRB approval to sponsor • It is PI’s responsibility to provide a copy of the IRB approval to ORA

  28. Just In Time • JIT information is an administrative piece that is necessary for the release of funds • In most cases when JIT is requested via personal email funding will be awarded • JIT link in Commons is not an indicator of funding decision • Occasionally (most often before the federal fiscal year end) award may be issued with a restriction on the use of human subjects when the IRB approval is not in place

More Related