1 / 20

Adult Serious Case Reviews

Adult Serious Case Reviews. Jill Manthorpe. What are Adult SCRs?. Definitions vary Internal – external (even high profile) Called many names Public – private Single or group/institution Crossover with complaints/ reviews/management inquiries…. Thresholds for SCRs.

xantha-buck
Download Presentation

Adult Serious Case Reviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adult Serious Case Reviews Jill Manthorpe

  2. What are Adult SCRs? Definitions vary • Internal – external (even high profile) • Called many names • Public – private • Single or group/institution • Crossover with complaints/ reviews/management inquiries….

  3. Thresholds for SCRs • Death – serious harm/concerns of vulnerable adult • Institutional practices • Problems with agency communications or relationships • Safeguarding Board concerns • Pressure - championing • Fit with policy & procedures • Panorama + media – something must be done!

  4. Current policy says (most LAs adopted) • Permissive (No Secrets) • ADASS (2006) purpose is ‘not to reinvestigate nor to apportion blame’ • To ‘establish whether there are lessons to be learnt from the circumstances of the case about the way in which local professionals & agencies work together to safeguard vulnerable adults • & review the effectiveness of procedures (both multi-agency and those of individual organisations) • & inform and improve local inter-agency practice • & improve practice by acting on learning (developing best practice) • & prepare or commission an overview report which brings together and analyses the findings of the various reports from agencies in order to make recommendations for future action’

  5. Get admin support (and support for them) Know how to unlock doors Build up experience Keep process going Not always in control Limited call back to review Independent chair not always necessary Independence has its uses (& costs) Little knowledge of learning – under-developed ways of monitoring recommendations Delays frustrating but explicable Chairs told us

  6. Looking at 22 • Communication problems 17 • No lead agency 5 • Training needed 13 • Whistle-blowing problems 3

  7. discretion • No set process – so decide ! • Identify resources • Agree purpose & terms of reference • Present chronology & facts, missed opportunities, think system • Ascertain co-operation • Establish ways to monitor & learn

  8. Thinking systems (Munro) • Recognise staff are neither autonomous or puppet • Why did poor practice happen? • Improve learning • Think sailing boat not train..

  9. ‘The report has four main elements after the introductory sections: good practice that was noted, lessons that have been learnt, changes in policy and practice that have been made since the events, and recommendations for action to improve adult safeguarding further’. (+Action Plan 37pp) Somerset Safeguarding Adults Board Serious Case Review concerning Parkfields Care Home Overview report by Margaret Sheather, Independent chair of the Review May 2011 Example 1: content

  10. Example 2 Executive Summary of the Serious Case Review in respect of Adult A DOB: 03/07/1945 DOD: 10/03/2010 Author: Margaret Williams Apx 3: Key people/organisations involved with Adult A page61/65 (excluded neighbours)

  11. Terms of reference for the SCR as established by the Board. To establish the circumstances and events surrounding the death: to examine the management of his care by individual agencies; to review the effectiveness of both multi agency & individual policies and procedures and operational methods & examine the probability of whether any changes would have changed the outcome; to inform and improve local inter-agency practice; to make recommendations for future practice and to provide explanation and insight for Bill’s relatives Example 3: terms of reference • Serious Case Review • Executive Summary • “Bill” • The Cumbria Safeguarding Adults Board wish to express sincere condolences to Bill’s family. • 2009 • Logos of County Council, NHS & Police

  12. What next London Borough of Merton illustrates keeping on the books approach ‘Recommendations The SGAB will ensure that all recommendations are actioned and will request updates from agencies The action plan will remain on the SGAB Agenda until such time that all recommendations have been implemented’ Example 4

  13. Fear of SCR ‘Following the Serious Case Review, ensure a more systematic approach to reviews in the learning disability service, particularly emphasising quality and outcomes.’ Extract from CSCI report to a Local Authority 2007 - feeling that they were ‘hung out to dry’ by making SCR public.

  14. Legal arenas • ‘In contrast to child care law, adult social care…has developed piecemeal…it remains a confusing patchwork of conflicting statutes…it is characterised by the sheer volume of legislation with much overlap & duplication. It is noted for its ‘baffling and tortuous complexity ..’ • Re A – per Munby J

  15. Legal/Practice Terms ‘No Secrets’ DH 2000 (England & Wales) • ‘In the absence of explicit, comprehensive legislation on adult protection, DH guidance instead defines vulnerable adults, characterises different forms of abuse and sets out a framework..’ (Mandelstam, ‘Safeguarding Adults and the law’ see SCIE 2011) • Defining a ‘vulnerable adult’ A person ‘who is or may be in need of community care services by reason of mental or other disability, age or illness; and who is or maybe unable to take care of him-or herself, or unable to protect him-or herself against significant harm or exploitation’ (DH 2000) – but contentious, also described as adult in vulnerable situations or adult at risk…

  16. Emphasis on mental capacity at the centre of decisions JusticeHedley: Re Z (Local Authority: Duty (2004) EWHC 2817 (Fam). Social care and health services are there to support not to control – seek authority from the court. JusticeMunby -A & C [2010] EWHC 978 (Fam) Person’s rights to live with risk ‘What good is making someone safer if it merely makes them miserable?’ Justice Munby MM (An Adult) (2007) EWHC 2003 (Fam), (2009) Recognise undue influence and coercion affecting capacity – role is to intervene to reduce the levels of coercion Re SA (2005) EWHC 2942 (Fam)(Case related to forced marriage) – Justice Munby (JE 2009 unreported)   Case Law

  17. Human Rights Act 1998 Mental Capacity Act 2005 amended 2007 (DoLS) NHS & Community Care Act 1990 Health and Social Care Act 2008 – regulation; direct payments Equalities Act 2010  Domestic Violence Crimes and Victims Act 2004 SVG Act (vetting & barring) ……… and the rest! Law Commission Review April 2011 Existing Legislation

  18. future • Thinking about: • Statutory Safeguarding Boards (decided) • Enhanced duty of cooperation • Duty to investigate/ make enquiries • And more..

  19. Thank you P.S. Please send us any SCRs you think we have missed ! Contact details e-mail: jill.manthorpe@kcl.ac.uk

More Related