290 likes | 537 Views
MIT Campus Plant Maintenance Project Review. Agenda. Facilities Organization - Bernie History - Mike Overview of Implementations – Bob Project Time Line - Bob System Benefits - Bernie Unique Challenges - Bob Scope – Mike Business Processes Overview - Bernie
E N D
MIT Campus Plant Maintenance Project Review
Agenda Facilities Organization - Bernie History - Mike Overview of Implementations – Bob Project Time Line - Bob System Benefits - Bernie Unique Challenges - Bob Scope – Mike Business Processes Overview - Bernie System Design - Bob Master Data - Mike GuiXT Demo – Mike Q&A - All
Facilities Organization Facilities is the largest administrative department at MIT Facilities maintains 150 buildings $120 million operating budget $200 million space change expenditures 600 Employees 10.7 million square feet of space From 2002 to 2006 campus will increase in size by 20% 24 X 7 operation
Project History • PPL system developed by MIT central IS group in 1980s – 1990’s • Maximo implemented as part of Reengineering in late 1990s • Enhancements to Maximo including expansion to Housing and CUP over time • Discovery Effort to investigate SAP PM with representation from IS&T, Facilities and an outside consultant in 2003 • SAP PM Phase I implementation in 2004
Overview of Implementations Phase IA – 3 months (Oct – Dec 2003) SAP Alternative Evaluation Gap Determination and Analysis System Recommendation (SAP/Maximo) Phase I – 6 months Replace Maximo legacy system for Facilities Repair and Maintenance with SAP PM (Jan - July 2004) Phase II Facilities Enhancements – Jan 2005 Department of Housing – Feb 2005 Facilities Central Utilities Plant (CUP) – March 2005 Data Warehouse Integration – May 2005 EH&S Integration – Sept 2005 Phase III - Proposed Facilities Custodial and Grounds - planned
System Benefits Integrates accounting, materials, and labor in real-time Eliminates 2 stand alone software applications Provides ability to plan and track labor Tracks costing data to lower levels of detail Provides data to perform repair/replace decisions Lays the foundation for subsequent efforts (EHS) Eliminates dual entry of 2,400 annual orders
Unique Challenges First Administrative Computing customer that operates 7 x 24 Reduce system downtime (5 to 2 1/2 days) Backup system proposed Implement easy to use screens – GuiXT solution Web Front-end integration for Facilities and Housing Organizations
Scope R&M Repairs Web Front-end for MIT community Automatic email notifications on create and close Building alert messages Sales orders Preventive maintenance Equipment – 25,000 Task List/Maintenance Plans – 10,000 Materials reservations Permits Labor confirmation – work centers Barcode on shop papers (Order Number, Material) Facilitates goods issue process Sub Orders
Scope (cont.) Housing - 16 Dormitories Web Front-end for students Automatic email notification on create and close Accounting is out of scope Central Utilities Plant (CUP) – 4 Buildings Preventative Maintenance 90% Equipment – 2,040 Unscheduled Repairs – 10% Accounting – Phase III
System Design • GuiXT Solution: • Combines multiple SAP screens into a single screen • Reduces SAP complexity • Non-ABAP scripting language with the ability to enhance interface functionality • Implemented for Repair Operation • Preventative Maintenance requires a more complex customer interface and has fewer users • Customize SAPGui to Facilities processes • Able to use enhance SAP’s functionality
Enhancement Tab for additional fields (ZIW38) System Design
System Design • EH&S Integration • EHS PM • Corrective Action Creates PM Work Order • EHS Reference Number • PM EHS • Operations Center Flags EHS Relevant Emergency Work Orders • Batch Program Update
Master Data Master Data Work Centers Functional Location – building, floor Equipment Classification Permits - Lockout Tagout Planner Groups Activity Types
Demo GuiXT System Demo – Mike Sherman