400 likes | 480 Views
Fat penguins and PQCD. A.I. Sanda Nagoya University. Collaborators: Y. Keum, E. Kou, T. Kurimoto, H-n. Li, C. D. Lu, N. Shinha, R. Shinha, K. Ukai, T. Yoshikawa M. Yang. My friend and I. π + π ― can be in I=0 or in I =2. rule. But π + π 0 can only be in I=2. Bit of history.
E N D
Fat penguinsand PQCD A.I. Sanda Nagoya University Collaborators: Y. Keum, E. Kou, T. Kurimoto, H-n. Li, C. D. Lu, N. Shinha, R. Shinha, K. Ukai, T. Yoshikawa M. Yang
π+π― can be in I=0 or in I =2 rule But π+π0can only be in I=2 Bit of history Bose statistics: S wave ππstate I=0, 2 Gell-Man and Pais 50 years ago
u c t s d g Penguins came to save the day SVZ Penguin can not cause ΔI=2 transitions
Chiral perturbation theory Factorizationapproximation Ffactor of 10 enhancement
π K σ penguin π My understanding of theΔI=1/2 rule
Penguins play important role in the ΔI=1/2 rule For B physics it also play important role Rare decays give us chance to hunt for physics beyond the standard model But, they pollute CP asymmetries
c What we have leaned Ratio is independent of strong interaction if: • Penguin and Tree have same KM phase 2. Penguin is absent
* * V V V f = tb td cb sin( 2 ) Im[ ] 1 * V V V tb td cb ππ Nearly100%CPV Bj notation Rosner&AIS Fermilab proeedings
sin = 0.82±0.12(stat)±0.05(syst) Belle sin = 0.75±0.09(stat)±0.04(syst) Babar Large CP Violation has been discovered! Where do we go from here?
If T dominated over P, We expected Fat penguins Penguins seems to be large in B decays
s b u b d T u u d s Pure P Pure T P
Babar With an assumption that |q/p|=1:
Belle Babar
3 unknowns Lots of observables
We have learned that Penguins are large! Model independent measurement is difficult Dynamical calculation of P and T Should be used as guide lines In digging for physics beyond the SM
Nonleptonic 2 body decays Over 70 decay modes
History of pQCD approach • Brodsky Lepage PR D22,2157(80) • Isgar Llewellynsmith NPB317,526(89) • Botts Sterman NP B325, 62(89) • Li and his collaborators • Kroll Eur.Phys.J.C12,99(00) • Li, Keum, AIS hep-ph/0004173 PR • hep-ph/0004004 PL
Probability of finding a parton near Wee’s don’t know which way they are moving Wee parton Depends on wee dynamics Cannot be computed by perturbative QCD Feynman’s Mistake? Pion form factor
Infrared singularity! Infrared singularity! • Isgar Llewellynsmith NPB317,526(89) Isgar Llewellynsmith NPB317,526(89) Feynman’s reasoning – Naive QCD
Feynman says small x and small dominates The quark and anti-quark are far apart in space Sudakov factor suppress these regions x b This is not so in QCD!
Gluon PQCD approach to pion form factor
π π Color Singlet state does not radiate Pion form factor Sudakov factor
Factorization Theorem H H H H H Brodsky Lepage PR D22,2157(80) Botts Sterman NP B325, 62(89) Li and his collaborators This is a divergent operator But it is multiplicative and can be absorbed into the wave function = + X 1+ + - This is free of infrared and linear divergences
Pion wave function Pion formfactor
b quark decay b d d B
Gluon d d PQCD approach
B b d X u transition form factor
We now know Why FA works
ππ branching ratio would agree better if penguins are larger
The diagram which produces strong interaction phase -> CP violation
CP asymmetries will become smaller if penguins are larger We should not worry about the disagreement until K0π± asymmetry is settled
d u Pure P s b P d
Conclusion • PQCD is at its infant stage • Seems very promising • Predicts 2 body decay rates • Input: wave function • Predicts strong interaction phase • Existence of CP violation at 10-20% level for some channels
Summary 2 • Are large CPV inconsistent with experiment? • May be, but can’t say until K+π0 CP asymmetry is in order ∼0