370 likes | 574 Views
Chapter 7. Altruism, Kin Selection, and Parenting. (Basic) Altruism. Cost to self for the benefit of another Evolutionary interpretation doesn’t require intent Kin selection. Fitness. Direct and indirect fitness Together make inclusive fitness Coefficient of relatedness, r
E N D
Chapter 7 Altruism, Kin Selection, and Parenting
(Basic) Altruism • Cost to self for the benefit of another • Evolutionary interpretation doesn’t require intent • Kin selection
Fitness • Direct and indirect fitness • Together make inclusive fitness • Coefficient of relatedness, r • Explains issues of kin selection
Kin Selection • Selection that operates on an individual in any way that effects the frequency of genes shared by common descent in relatives • Hamilton’s rule: rb>c
Proximate or Ultimate • Levels of causation • Altruistic act • Proximate level: altruistic • Consider the individual as the active unit/agent • Donor loses out, but recipient gains • Ultimate level: selfish • Consider the genes as the active units/agents • Donor loses direct fitness, but gains enough indirect fitness to offset loss in long run
Domestic Violence • High proportion of murders • Approximately 25% • Conflict with fitness accounts? • Maybe not… • Approximately 4/5 domestic murders are relatives by marriage • Only 1 in 5 are relatives by blood
Risk 4 3 2 1 Relative Risk of Homocide Spouses Other Nonrelative Offspring Parent Other relatives
Alliances • Mothers and sons • Ally against father • Oedipus complex • Sexual competition between fathers and sons • Evolutionary interpretation • Successful polygamist • Resources • Mother’s interest coincides with son’s
Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitane • King of England 1154-1189 • Married 1152 • Eleanor 12 years older • Henry unfaithful • 5 sons, 3 daughters • Richard the Lionhearted, John I • Division of lands • Rebellion in 1173 • Eleanor sides with sons • Imprisoned until 1189
Kin Selection and Kin Conflict • Doesn’t predict altruism must occur • Just that altruism is more likely to occur, all else being equal • Costs and benefits • If benefits high enough, kin can be sacrificed • Altruism shifts to selfishness
Take Home Message • Biological kinship is important • Discriminate in favour of kin • E.g., Shavit et al. (1994), air raid shelters • E.g., Burnstein et al. (1994), hypothetical life/death situations and the giving of aid • But, favourable kinship discrimination is not inviolable • Kinship is only one factor in behaviour determination • Inclusive vs. direct fitness
Adoption • Violation of kin selection? • Hamilton’s rule • rB > C • Maladaptive, neutral, adaptive? • Who? When? Why? • EEA? • Silk’s (1990) work on South Pacific society • Chimpanzee aunts
Step Parenting • One biological parent, one non-biological • Conflict • Resources, energy, reproduction
Females stay with pride, young males leave Dominant male displaced New male needs to impregnate females quickly Systematic killing of predecessor’s cubs Effects of nursing Reduction in ovulation --> reduced probability of conception Selected for through evolution Lactation stops, ovulation returns to normal --> increases male lion’s direct fitness Similar pattern of behaviour seen in primates (e.g., langurs) and birds Lions
Human Condition • Martin Daly and Margo Wilson • Step-children stand an increased risk of maltreatment from their step-parent • Canadian step children • 60 times more likely to suffer fatal abuse by step-parent than children living with genetic parents • Step-parent investment • Sacrifice of reproductive success
Resource Limitation • Finite parental resources • Examples • Homeless adolescents in New York • In Britain, genetic and step parent have lower educational aspirations for stepchild • In USA, stepchildren in university receive less financial help from parents
Human Complexity • Network of: • Connections • Obligations • Step-child and step parent • Parent and step parent • Half-siblings
Trends • Severity/incidence of child maltreatment decreases with age of child • Disagrees with non-evolutionary theory • Wide range of abuse types • Abuse decreases as mother’s age increases • Type of fatal abuse • Step-parent: bludgeoned, kicked, battered • Genetic parent: “less assaultive”; murder-suicide
Cross Cultural • USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Finland, Japan, Korea, Nigeria, Hong Kong, Trinidad • Not identical, but similar patterns
An Adapted Trait? • Sexually selected infanticide • Currently non-adaptive or maladaptive in humans • Humans aren’t lions or langurs • Reciprocity • Risky • e.g., child abusers in prison
Parental Considerations • Present and future survivorship • Future fertility • Personal genetic fitness • Gain from reproduction vs. loss from change in life cycle • Environmental constraints
Having Multiple Offspring • Insurance hypothesis • Opportunism hypothesis • Resource dependent
Infanticide • Non-normative behaviour • Cross-cultural • Last resort
Optimization Decisions • Abandonment of young and/or old • Personal vs. offspring survival • Survive to reproduce another day • RV
Limited Parental Resources • Abandonment • Personal parental survival ranked above offspring survival • Live to reproduce another day • Abortion • Age dependent
Foetal Fitness: Spontaneous Abortions • 30-75% • Low quality embryo • Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) • Signal’s embryo’s fitness --> progesterone • Mother’s ability • Environmental constraints • Genotype
Poor Infant Quality • Physical and/or mental disability • Investment cost vs. genetic pay-off • Disabilities may be relatively minor • Phenotypic signals of genotype • e.g., breech birth correlated with SIDS
Sex Ratios • Fisher’s principle • Male births infrequent --> male finds many mates • Parents that produce more males will get more grandchildren • Male-producing gene spreads • Males outnumber females • Now, female births infrenquent --> female can pick mate • Selection favours female-producing genes • Feedback loop ---> 50/50 sex ratio
Trivers-Willard Effect • Slight modification of Fisher’s principle • Not equal numbers of each sex • Preference for children of a particular sex • Biased sex ratio • Investment in each sex balanced against the sex’s reproductive potential • Which sex is going to be more reproductively successful?
Trivers-Willard Reasoning • Large, healthy males mate more than small males; almost all females mate • Healthiest females produce healthiest offspring, which grow into largest adults • Therefore: • healthy females should produce more males than females • less healthy females should produce more females than males
Factors • In utero differentiation • Maternal stress --> higher male fetal mortality • Infanticide • Intentional and unintentional • Adult sex ratio • Sex ratio at birth • Differences in male/female maturation times • Differential male/female mortality
Local Resource Enhancement • Offspring of one sex provide greater assistance to parents • Increase parents’ reproductive output • Greater investment in this sex • Helpers-at-the-nest model • Local resource competition
Teen Pregnancy • Ignorance or unintended • Deliberate attempt to gain resources • Social security and/or husband • Adaptive reproductive strategy?
Female Shared Childrearing • Lower socio-economic women • Poor job and marriage prospects • May improve with age • Have child at about 15 • Over three generations • Mother: age 15 (reproductive) • Grandmother: age 35 (worker) • Great grandmother: age 50 (childcare)
Cost/Benefit • Mother sacrifices resource acquisition (RA), gains personal reproductive fitness (PRF) • Grandmother sacrifices PRF, gains inclusive fitness (IF), gains RA • Great grandmother sacrifices RA and PRF, gains IF
Evidence: Trinidadian Study • Only one reproductive female per household • Daughters only become pregnant after their mother’s last child is 4+ years old • Mother-daughter conflict • Greatest if daughter of childbearing age and mother still reproducing • Correlational
Issues • How is reproduction regulated? • Multi-daughter families? • Historical evidence? • Cross-cultural? • Correlational results • Interesting, but...