1 / 33

A Brief Overview of Current Research on Dividends

A Brief Overview of Current Research on Dividends. Gretchen A. Fix Department of Statistics Rice University 8 October 2003. Why Study Dividends?. Dividends are the primary determinant of equity value Equity value: funds contributed by stockholders + retained earnings

xinqian
Download Presentation

A Brief Overview of Current Research on Dividends

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Brief Overview of Current Research on Dividends Gretchen A. Fix Department of Statistics Rice University 8 October 2003

  2. Why Study Dividends? • Dividends are the primary determinant of equity value • Equity value: funds contributed by stockholders + retained earnings • A firm can do two things with its earnings: • Pay them out to equity holders • Reinvest in positive NPV projects • As a firm matures, growth opportunities will become limited, and it will not have the second option • The price of a stock is strong signal of expected future dividend payments

  3. Overview • Four papers of interest • “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates” • Fama and French (working paper) • “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?” • Fama and French (JFE) • “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis” • Grullon and Michaely (JoF) • “Are Dividends Disappearing? Dividend Concentration and the Consolidation of Earnings” • DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Skinner (forthcoming JFE)

  4. Overview • My (proposed) contributions • What is survival analysis? • Why apply survival analysis to this question? • My hypothesis and plan of attack

  5. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates”Fama and FrenchCRSP Working Paper • 1979 marks a jump in the rate at which new firms list on US exchanges • pre 1979 160 per year • post 1979  550 per year • Characteristics of new lists change • Dist’n of profitability becomes more left skewed • Profitability measured as ratio of earnings (before interest) to assets, Et / At • Dist’n of growth becomes more right skewed • Growth measured as scaled change in assets, (At – At-1) / At-1

  6. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates”Fama and FrenchCRSP Working Paper • Changing firm characteristics negatively impact new list survival • 1973 firms • P(new list survives its first 10 yrs) = 61.0 % • 1991 firms • P(new list survives its first 10 yrs) = 37.0%

  7. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates”Fama and FrenchCRSP Working Paper • Further analysis attributes decline in survival rates not to mergers, but to delistings caused by poor performance • “more than two in five of the new lists of 1981-1991 are delisted within ten years for poor performance”

  8. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Dividends currently taxed at a higher rate than capital gains • Firms that pay dividends effectively have a higher cost of equity than those that don’t

  9. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • 1973: 52.8% of publicly traded, non-financial, non-utility (industrial) firms pay dividends • 1978: 66.5 % (peak) • 1999: 20.8%

  10. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Three questions of interest • What are characteristics of firms that choose to pay dividends? • Is the decline in the number and percentage of payers caused by a decline in the prevalence of the characteristics identified above? • Have firms possessing characteristics historically typical of payers become less likely to pay?

  11. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Answers • Relevant characteristics: profitability, investment (growth) opportunities, size • Former payers: distressed • Never payers: more profitable than former payers, abundant investment opportunities • Payers: more profitable than never payers, fewer investment opportunities, large size

  12. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Answers (cont’d) • Surge of new lists (1979) floods market with firms possessing characteristics of never payers • Low profitability, strong growth, small size

  13. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Answers (cont’d) • Regardless of their characteristics, firms have become less likely to pay dividends • “Lower propensity to pay” • Techniques used to establish lower propensity to pay • Logistic regression • Portfolio approach

  14. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Logistic regression approach • 1963-1977 base period • Response variable equals 1 if firm pays dividends, 0 otherwise • Fit logistic regression model to base period data using size, profitability, and investment opportunities as independent variables

  15. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Logistic regression approach (cont’d) • Take ßvector from base period model and size, profitability, and investment data from each year post 1977 • For each year, estimate expected % of dividend payers • Variation in expected % of payers reflects changing characteristics of population of firms • Difference between expected % of payers and actual % of payers reflects “lower propensity to pay”

  16. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”Fama and FrenchJournal of Financial Economics, 60, 3 – 43 • Share repurchases • Some claim that firms are now tending to substitute share repurchases for dividends; thus, share repurchase activity could be the reason fewer firms are paying out dividends • Fama and French dismiss this--maintain that share repurchases are largely the domain of dividend paying firms

  17. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis”Grullon and MichaelyJournal of Finance, 57 (4), 1649-1684 • Despite the relative tax advantage of capital gains over ordinary income, US firms seemed to favor dividends over share repurchases when undertaking cash payouts • However, share repurchase activity has been on the rise over the past 20 years • 1980-2000 share repurchase expenditures up 26.1%; dividends up 6.8% over same period

  18. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis”Grullon and MichaelyJournal of Finance, 57 (4), 1649-1684 • Three questions of interest • Has there been a change in payout policy? • Are firms funding share repurchases with money they otherwise would have used for dividends? • If firms are substituting, why didn’t they start earlier?

  19. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis”Grullon and MichaelyJournal of Finance, 57 (4), 1649-1684 • Answers • Since 1980s, more firms have opted to initiate share repurchase activity than begin to pay dividends • Percentage of firms that pay only dividends (of total number of firms distributing cash to equity holders) 1972: 69% 2000: 20%

  20. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis”Grullon and MichaelyJournal of Finance, 57 (4), 1649-1684 • Answers (cont’d) • Share repurchases are being funded by potential increases in dividends • Especially for large, established firms • Grullon and Michaely believe Fama and French use incorrect measure of share repurchases • Market reaction to announcement of dividend reduction significantly less negative for firms who engage in share repurchases; implies substitution effect

  21. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis”Grullon and MichaelyJournal of Finance, 57 (4), 1649-1684 • Answers (cont’d) • Share repurchases increase after passage of Rule 10b-18 in 1982 • Prior to this, no definite rules set by the SEC to regulate share repurchase activity • Repurchasing firms faced risk of SEC investigation

  22. “Are Dividends Disappearing? Dividend Concentration and the Consolidation of Earnings”DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and SkinnerForthcoming--Journal of Financial Economics • Fama and French report a decrease in the number and percentage of industrial firms that pay dividends over the period 1978 – 1998 • But, real and nominal dividends paid by industrial firms have increased over this period • Reduction in number and percentage of payers comes mainly from loss of small firms • Largest payers have significantly increased dividends • “increase in real dividends paid by firms at the top of the dividend distribution swamps the dividend reduction associated with the loss of many small payers at the bottom”

  23. “Are Dividends Disappearing? Dividend Concentration and the Consolidation of Earnings”DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and SkinnerForthcoming--Journal of Financial Economics • High and increasing concentration of the dividend supply • 2000: 75 firms pay 75% of agg. industrial dividends • Increasing concentration of earnings • 2000: 56 firms with over $500 million in earnings responsible for: • 86.2 % of aggregate industrial earnings • 61.4 % of aggregate industrial dividends

  24. Aggregate industrial nominal dividends 1978: $31.3 billion 2000: $96.2 billion (increased by 207.3%) Aggregate industrial real dividends 2000: $36.4 billion (increased by 16.3%) Mean real dividend paid 1978: $14.4 million 2000: $39.2 million Median real dividend paid 1978: $1.4 million 2000: $3.6 million Increasing gap between mean and median hints at increasing concentration “Are Dividends Disappearing? Dividend Concentration and the Consolidation of Earnings”DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and SkinnerForthcoming--Journal of Financial Economics

  25. What is Survival Analysis? • “a collection of statistical procedures for data analysis for which the outcome variable of interest is time until an event occurs” Kleinbaum, p. 4 • Typical applications • Biostatistics—study treatment effects in clinical trials • Industrial—study failure behavior of a machine

  26. Functions of Interest in Survival Analysis • Survival/survivor function, S(t) • Gives probability that a subject survives longer than specified time t • S(t) = P(T > t) = 1 – P(T  t) = 1 – F(t) • Properties • Non increasing • S(0) = 1; at the start of the study, all observations are alive • S() = 0; if the study time were increased without limit, eventually there would be no observations left alive

  27. Functions of Interest in Survival Analysis • Hazard function, λ(t) • λ(t) = limt0 P(t  T < t + t | T  t) / t • “Instantaneous potential per unit time for the event to occur, given that the individual has survived up to time t” • Conditional failure RATE (probability per unit time)

  28. Typical Characteristic of Survival Analysis Data—Censoring • Exact survival time of a subject is unknown • Usually occurs at the right side of the follow-up period; but can have left or interval censoring • Typical reasons for right censoring: • Subject does not experience the event before the study ends • Subject is lost to follow up during the study • Subject withdraws from the study

  29. Why Apply Survival Analysis to this Question? • Outcome variable of interest = time to dividend initiation • Censoring present in data • Some firms are yet to initiate dividends • Some firms are lost during the study • Merge with other firms • Go private • Fail (go bankrupt)

  30. My Hypothesis • Decision to initiate dividends depends in part on the age of the firm • Firm age should not be measured in terms of listing years, but instead should be measured from founding or incorporation • Market conditions of the 1980s and 1990s allowed firms to go public earlier in their lifecycles

  31. My Hypothesis (cont’d) • Apparent decline in the propensity to pay is another example of the shift in population characteristics toward those of firms who have never paid dividends • shift is toward younger, more immature firms who have not yet reached the natural age of dividend initiation

  32. Plan of Attack • Data: representative sample of 4711 firms • Years of founding, incorporation, and listing for each observation • Supplemental data from Compustat/CRSP • Year of first dividend • Annual data on market value, repurchase activity, earnings, etc. • Goal: fit Cox model with time-dependent covariates; include variable to pick up decreased propensity to pay; pray the variable is not significant

  33. Challenges • Informed censoring • Censoring mechanism assumed to be independent of failure • Probably not a valid assumption for firms that were censored due to bankruptcy • Probably valid for those that were merger targets • Left truncation • Entry into the risk set at a time after 0 • If time to dividends measured from incorporation, by our rules, the firm is not at risk to become a dividend payer until after it has listed

More Related