1 / 20

Mortality Modeling: Lee-Carter and the Macroeconomy Katja Hanewald

Mortality Modeling: Lee-Carter and the Macroeconomy Katja Hanewald Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk. Summary. Mortality reacts to macroeconomic changes Effect is introduced into the Lee-Carter framework

xue
Download Presentation

Mortality Modeling: Lee-Carter and the Macroeconomy Katja Hanewald

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mortality Modeling: Lee-Carter and the Macroeconomy Katja Hanewald Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk

  2. Summary • Mortality reacts to macroeconomic changes • Effect is introduced into the Lee-Carter framework • Important result for the regulation and risk management of life insurance companies

  3. Outline • Literature Review • Data • Analysis • Correlation Analysis • Regression Analysis • Conclusion

  4. Literature Review • Combine two domains of the demographic literature (1) Stochastic Mortality Modeling • Lee-Carter (1992): “The earliest model and still the most popular” • Universal method, has been applied to various countries • Standard variant: Lee-Miller (2001) • Two stages: ln(mx,t) = ax + bx ∙ kt+ ex,t • kt usually modeled as random walk with drift

  5. Literature Review • Mortality index kt: • Key driver of mortality dynamics in the LC model • “Index of the level of mortality” (Lee and Carter, 1992) • “Dominant temporal pattern in the decline of mortality” (Tuljapurkar et al., 2000) • “Random period effect” (Cairns et al., 2008) • kt– Just an unobserved latent variable?

  6. Literature Review (2) Mortality and Macroeconomic Fluctuations • Ruhm (2000): Mortality rates in the USA fluctuate procyclically over the period 1972–1991 • Similar patterns observed for: • USA, Spain, and Japan (Tapia Granados, 2005a/b, 2008) • Germany (Neumayer, 2004, Hanewald, 2008) • Sweden (Tapia Granados and Ionides, 2008) • 23 OECD countries, 1960–1997 (Gerdtham and Ruhm, 2006) • Procyclical deaths: motor vehicle crashes, CVD, liver ailments, influenza/pneumonia • Acyclical/countercyclical: cancer, suicide, diabetes mellitus

  7. Popular mortality forecasting framework: Lee-Carter model Central Idea Reaction of age-specific mortality rates to economic fluctuations Introduce the link between mortality and the macroeconomy into the LC model via the mortality index kt  Direct translation into age-specific death rates

  8. Data • Annual data for six OECD countries,1950-2005 • Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Spain, USA • Lee-Carter mortality index kt • Lee-Miller (2001) variant • Treat males and females separately • Age range: 30-85 (0-99) • Real GDP growth rates • Unemployment rate changes

  9. Correlation Analysis • Correlations between • Macroeconomic fluctuations (DEconomicIndicatort) • Changes in the mortality index (Dkt) • Different time horizons • Entire sample period (1951-2005) • Subperiods

  10. Correlation Analysis • Entire sample period (1951-2005): • Significant procyclical correlations in Aus, Can, Jap, USA • Corr. range between 27% (females, Aus) and 38% (males, Can) • Cross-correlations: no lag • Interpretation: Reductions in mortality tend to be smaller when the economy strengthens • Findings agree with results of Ruhm (2000) and others for age-specific mortality rates

  11. Correlation Analysis Correlations between Dkt and real GDP growth rates:

  12. Correlation Analysis • Three subperiods • Structural change observed in all six countries • Relation reverses in most cases • Results for unemployment rates support findings • Study moving correlations: • Correlations over 20-year subperiods • Moving starting points

  13. Correlation Analysis • Moving correlations between Dkt and real GDP growth rates

  14. Discussion • Age-specific death rates of U.S. males • 1951–1970 vs. 1991–2005: Correlations for 40 of 56 age groups reverse from positive to negative • Tapia Granados (2008): similar tendency for age-specific mortality rates in Japan • Explanation: Changes in the causes of death

  15. Discussion • Changes in the causes of death • Early 1970s: Dramatic decline in CVD mortality • 1990s: Reduced mortality from tobacco and alcohol consumption, motor vehicle crashes, influenza/pneumonia • Ongoing: Substantial increase in deaths attributable to poor diet and lack of physical activity

  16. Regression Analysis • Standard RW model Dkt = q + et ,with et~ N(0,s) iid • Extended RW model: Dkt = q +b ∙DEconomic Indicatort + et , withet~ N(0,s ) iid • Separate models for males/females for all countries • Example: Mortality index of Canadian males Dkt = –1.359***+ 15.173**∙ Dln(real GDPt)+ et (0.218) (5.004)

  17. Regression Analysis • Check all models’ error properties • Test for parameter stability (Quandt-Andrews Test) • Generalization of Chow’s break-point test • Treats the date of a potential structural break as unknown • Significant break years identified for males at the beginning of the 1970s (Aus: 1971, Jap & USA: 1973, Can: 1976) • Further candidate years

  18. Regression Analysis • Stability of the coefficient on real GDP growth: Chow test sequence

  19. Regression Analysis • Model the structural change using dummy variables • Example: Canadian males (1951-2005, adj. R² = 0.416)

  20. Conclusion • LC mortality index kt correlates significantly with macroeconomic fluctuations • Common understandingof kt • Link between economic conditions and aggregate mortality is subject to a structural change • Established relationship • Important implications for life insurers: Hanewald, Post, and Gründl (2009, SSRN

More Related