100 likes | 241 Views
Regional Development Agency experiences in England and Romania. Richard Harding UK Twinning advisor in EU Structural Instruments - Romania. The English regions. Romania’s Development Regions. English RDAs. Cross sectoral management Boards Nationally funded – “Single Pot”
E N D
Regional Development Agency experiences inEngland and Romania Richard HardingUK Twinning advisor in EU Structural Instruments - Romania
English RDAs • Cross sectoral management Boards • Nationally funded – “Single Pot” • Supported by regional-level Government Offices • Strategy development • Own project implementation - with partners • Tasking frameworks and targets, but flexibility • Assessments – NAO and stakeholders – improvement plans • National network – growing influence
Romanian RDAs • Green Paper recommendations not fully enacted • Report to local authorities (RDBs), but deliver national programmes • No own projects • Tensions with national Ministry – RDP/NDP and implementation • Fragile financial position – remedied in part • Mixed evaluation findings • No functioning national network
Future perspectives • English RDAs to manage EU programmes • Romanian RDAs to be IBs for ROP 2007-2013 and cross border programmes • Crucial issue of regional coordination in Romania – RDA role?
Future perspectives • English RDAs to manage EU programmes • Romanian RDAs to be IBs for ROP 2007-2013 and cross border programmes • Crucial issue of regional coordination in Romania – RDA role?
Regionalisation? • Not in Romanian Constitution • England’s referendum outcome
Ingredients for success • Partnership-based management Boards • Clear reporting lines to polıcy funder, not beneficiary • Partnership planning process with ‘honest broker’ role • Merging of different funding streams for regional objectives • Adequate and predictable finance – staff development • Evaluation culture – public face Easy to say , difficult to do…