10 likes | 69 Views
Interaction. Interaction. SH = 0. SH = 0. £. . SH . SH . 0.2. 0.2. 10. b. b. T. T. R. R. -. -. I/BMPR. I/BMPR. -. -. I/ALK1/2. I/ALK1/2. 7. 8. 9. c. c. -. -. Ski/SnoN. Ski/SnoN. 5. 5. 7. 7. SARA/Mixer/FAST1. SARA/Mixer/FAST1. 10. 10. 10. 10. Total .
E N D
Interaction Interaction SH = 0 SH = 0 £ SH SH 0.2 0.2 10 b b T T R R - - I/BMPR I/BMPR - - I/ALK1/2 I/ALK1/2 7 8 9 c c - - Ski/SnoN Ski/SnoN 5 5 7 7 SARA/Mixer/FAST1 SARA/Mixer/FAST1 10 10 10 10 Total Total ‘ ‘ functional functional ’ ’ 23 22 27 26 Unknown function Unknown function 10 9 13 14 Total Total 32 32 40 40 <title Sequence Harmony Identifies Subtype-Specific Sites> <Jane Author>, <John Q. Author> andJaap Heringa Centre for Integrative Bioinformatics VU (IBIVU), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam • Introduction • The Smad family <…> • <…> help to explain differences between the subfamilies. • Conclusions • Concluding, sites of low Sequence Harmony <…> • <…> signalling pathways. • Results • The Smad family <…> • <…> help to explain differences between the subfamilies. Table1|Sequence Harmony selects <…> the Smad-MH2 alignment. • Theory • The Sequence Harmony <…> follows:<…> entropy of both groups. Figure 1|ROC plots <…> also shown.