“Corporate Social Responsibility in the Middle East” Istanbul, 19-20 June 2013

1. “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Middle East” Istanbul, 19-20 June 2013 Business Commitment to Human Rights Business & Human Rights Resource Centre www.business-humanrights.org

4. Why a human rights approach? human rights are grounded in internationally-accepted and recognized standards Irene Khan, former Secretary-General of Amnesty International, noted: "Human rights are rooted in law. Respecting and protecting them was never meant to be an optional extra, a matter of choice. It is expected and required. It should be part of the mainstream of any company's strategy, not only seen as part of its corporate social responsibility strategy."

5. CSR VS Business & Human Rights CSR approach tends to be top-down Human rights approach is bottom-up with the individual at the centre, not the corporation.From a company’s perspective, this means that it is an effective framework to use when assessing potential risks the business may face throughout its operations.

7. The business case • There is a strong ‘business case’ for respecting human rights, companies are obliged to respect human rights at all times, not just when it suits them. • Working towards a safe workplace for women, free from sexual harassment definitely maintain skilled women in work. • Communication companies who shut down their services in Egypt during the Tahrir square demonstration, suffered heavily from consumers’ “sanctions” post the events. • (Extractive sector) Oil drilling companies in Egypt taking no consideration of the livelihoods in the region

8. Human rights dilemmas in MENA • Discrimination against women (mandated by law in Saudi Arabia) • Practical barriers to freedom of association (widespread –Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Egypt, Syria…) • Unequal pay between men and women (widespread) • Other forms of discrimination • Harassment of colleagues in the office • Restrictions on freedom of speech • Selling of arms selling to repressive countries (Syria, Saudi Arabia) • Selling of surveillance software – and attacks on privacy (Egypt, KSA, Yemen, Syria, Iran, UAE) • Migrant workers’ working conditions • Poor safety measures • Abuses by privatesecuritycompanieshired for protection • IT and telecomcompanies’ complicity in surveillance and censorship

9. 1. Company response process

10. Company response process NGO, civil society Company Website 1.5 million hits Resource Centre

11. H U M A N R I G H T S W A T C H For A Better Life Migrant Worker Abuse in Bahrain and the Government Reform Agenda

19. 2. Positive initiatives by companies

22. Remarks from a roundtable in Cairo: Co-hosted by the Global Business Initiative, UN Global Compact, Egyptian Corporate Responsibility Centre & others:

23. 3. Guidance

24. Relevant frameworks • UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights • ILO instruments, such as the Tripartite Declaration • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises • UN Global Compact • ISO 26 000 standard • Multi-stakeholder initiatives for particular sectors • Company-level human rights and CSR policies

27. Integrating respect for human rights: Make a public commitment to respect human rights Tell people what you are doing Check for human rights risks Take action to deal with risks you identify Provide a solution if things go wrong Monitor your progress

28. The Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights in MENA • A new development of the human rights concept • Little knowledge about the GPs among civil society, government, business, unions, academia and the media • Lack or no making use of GPs • Low levels of awareness on how CSR relates to Business and Human Rights • Minimal advocacy efforts by civil society relating to GPs

29. Waysforward • Mainstreaming Principles into existing initiatives (domestically and regionally). • Urging states to incorporate GPs into legislations. • GPs can be a basis for development of corporate human rights policies and standards • GPs can be a good tool for advocacy with states and corporations • GPs could be a good authoritative reference for developing a progressive jurisprudence. • Can be taken forward by similar initiatives at the regional level: OECD, Working Group of ACHPR on Extractives Industries. • On the road to a binding instrument on the accountability of PSMCs for HR violations. • Resorting to, and import GPs into, opportunities which domestic laws and remedies currently offer: See ICJ Access to Justice Studies, US ATCA, SA PSMC Act, Alternative mechanisms, startegic litigation.

30. Sign up to our free weekly update

31. Sa’eda Al-Kilani and Rania Fazah Middle East & North Africa Researchers & Representatives, based in Jordan & Lebanon

32. Teşekkür Ederim شكراThank You!Merci!Gracias!Grazie!Obrigado!谢谢!