400 likes | 493 Views
The E ffect of H ome - country Gender Status on the Labor Supply of Immigrants. Yunsun Huh University of Wisconsin, Green Bay. November 4 th , 20 11. Motivation. Women have a different socio-economic position from men and this difference varies across different cultures and institutions
E N D
The Effect of Home-country Gender Status on the Labor Supply of Immigrants Yunsun Huh University of Wisconsin, Green Bay November 4th, 2011
Motivation • Women have a different socio-economic position from men and this difference varies across different cultures and institutions • Huh, Y.(2011) : The Effect of Home-country Gender Status on Labor Market Success of Immigrants. • The differential effect of gender status in the home country on wages of female and male immigrants in the U.S.
Question & Objective • How cultural background (e.g. gender status) affect women’s decision for LFP and LS different from men? • Analyze dynamics of labor supply for women immigrants relative to men across different countries of orign.
Question & Objective • How does cultural background (i.e. gender status) affect women’s labor participation different from men? • Analyze the dynamics of labor supply behavior of women immigrants relative to men
Hypothesis 1 • Women from more egalitarian societies have more opportunities to work than women from less egalitarian societies • More: confidence, positive attitude
Hypothesis 2 • Women from more egalitarian societies have less opportunities to work than women from less egalitarian societies • Less : more challenges, more aggressive for job searching, deal with inferior working condition etc.
Prior Literature • Labor & Immigration Literature • No consideration of the impact of home-country conditions on the labor supply of immigrants women • Labor Supply literature • Focuses on gender wage gap or fertility behavior: Antecol (2001, 2003), Fernandez and Fogli(2006), Latt and Sevilla-Sanz (2011) • Immigration literature • Focuses on human capital factors or female labor force activity in home country :Blau, Kahn, and Papps (2008)
Contribution • Consider both women & men • Add gendered perspective on why origins of immigrants matter • Provide insights for Policy • Findings: • Higher gender equality increases labor supply of both sexes • A greater effect of gender status on women • Higher development status increases reservation wages of both sexes
Data source and description • Individual Immigrant Data: IPUMS-USA(The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series), 1 % sample of the 2006 ACS (American Community Survey) • Restricted sample: Foreign born Individuals between 25 & 65, who arrived in the U.S over age of 18.
Data source and description • Home country gender status : GDI (Gender Development Index) GEM (Gender Empowerment Measure) : Human Development Reports, UN • 42 countries selected: - 2001GDI &1999GEM: both based on1999observations - Enough observations of female immigrant workers in U.S.
Data source and description • GDI (Gender Development Index) :An indication of the standard of living in a country • HDI(Human Development Index) modified for gender inequality • Health, education, and a decent standard of living.
Data source and description • GEM (Gender Empowerment Measure) :A measure of the gender inequalityof opportunities in a country. • Economic and political participation & decision making
Approach • Labor Market Participation: binary logit regressionwith GEM and GDI • Labor Supply Behavior : OLS only for labor market participants including zero income earners with GEM and GDI • Separate sample group by sex • Robustness test (likelihood ratio test, multicollinearity, heteroskedasticity, etc.)
Bench Mark Model • Labor Supply • Labor force participation : Binary Dependent variable • Controlled for the number of children under5, family size, education, marital status, language, region,race
Estimation Model • Model A: GEM and interaction term btwn. GEM & Yrus • Model B: GDI and interaction term btwn. GDI & Yrus • Model C: GEM, GDI, and interaction with Yrus for both
Odd ratio from logit regression (LFP) ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level
Estimation Coefficients for Labor Supply ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level
Estimation coefficients for Model A ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level Ex) Thailand (25th percentile) Dominican Rep(75thpercentile) Women’s working hours: 0.77hr (46min), Men’s working hours: 1.27hr (76min)
Estimation coefficients for Model B ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level Ex) Iran (25th percentile) Israel (75th percentile) Women’s working hours: 0.81hr (48min) Men’s working hours: 2.1hr(126min)
Estimation coefficients for Model C ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level
The Effect of GEM on Labor Supply over time Based on Model A, including only GEM in the regression Based on Model C, including both GEM& GDI in the regression Effect on working hours Effect n working hours YrUS YrUS
The Effect of GDI on Labor Supply over time Based on Model B, including only GDI in the regression Based on Model C, including both GEM& GDI in the regression Effect on log wages Effect on log wages YrUS YrUS
Robustness Test:A model for all immigrants • Controlling for all human capital factors, GEM, GDI, and gender ** denotes statistically significant at 5% level * denotes statistically significant at 10% level
Conclusion: Results 1. Substantial cultural effect on labor participation and labor supply of immigrants even after controlling for human capital factors • Different Effect of GDI and GEM on labor participation • GEM increase working hours of both women and men, but it has greater effect on women
Result 2. Different effects of GEM by sex. • Strong positive impact of GEM on labor participation and labor supply of female immigrants Support H1 3. Small effect of GDI • Small negative impact of GDI on labor participation • Stronger GDI effect on labor supply of men
Conclusion: Implication The more empowered the women in a society are, the higher gains in terms of labor supply for both women and men. Economic development status helps men more. Importance of socio-political factors on capability 26
Additional Results • Labor Force Participation 1)Race : Compared to Hispanic • Black, American Indian, Asian men less likely in LFP • Balck and Asian women more likely in LFP 2) Region : Affect men’s LFP only. • Compared to West, South men more likely to be in LFP, while Mwest, East men are less likely to be in LFP • Labor Supply 1) Race: Compared to Hispanic • White men work more, Black, AI, Asian men work less • Black and Asian women work more 2) Region: Affect women’s LS only. • Compared to West, South women work less than women in the West while East Mwest women work more than West women.
Additional Results • Education: • More education has positive impact on both LFP & LS. Greater impact on women than men. • English Fluency: • Helps more women than men. • Fluency increase probability to be in LFP of women but not affect men. • Self-selection • Higher level of education than home country population doesn’t affect on Job Market Participation, but it increases working hours.
Race of immigrants Male Female
EX) Portugal vs. Korea • Similar GDI (0.870 vs. 0.868) & Very Different GEM (0.571 vs. 0.336) • Moving from Korea to Portugal • Model A (Only GEM): Women 20 % Men 15 % • Model B (Only GDI) : Women 0.11% Men 0.16% • Model C (Both GEM & GDI): Women 26.6% Men 6.08%