1 / 31

Geologic Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in Kansas

KSU

yael
Download Presentation

Geologic Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in Kansas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Geologic Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in Kansas

    2. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Outline – Growing Opportunities

    3. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 Basics

    4. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 US Stationary CO2 Sources

    5. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Kansas CO2 Sources and Oil Resource

    6. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010

    7. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 Geologic Sequestration Representation of the various ways of storing CO2 in sedimentary basins (modified from Bachu, 2001). Representation of the various ways of storing CO2 in sedimentary basins (modified from Bachu, 2001).

    8. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Compare scale of Arbuckle with Sleipner

    9. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Kansas CO2 EOR and CCS studies and proposed projects

    10. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Arbuckle injection rates and sequestration

    11. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Volumetric estimates for storing CO2 in Arbuckle domes on CKU

    12. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Theoretical CO2 storage volume in “depleted” Kansas oil and gas reservoirs

    13. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Arbuckle as saline aquifer storage

    14. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Reality of costs

    15. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 Retention in EOR

    16. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 storage capacity and mode

    17. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 Processing Styles

    18. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Technical Requirements

    19. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Minimum Miscibility Pressure

    20. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 Phase Diagram

    21. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2’s operating requirements and reservoir constraints

    22. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 volume with depth (P and T)

    23. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Defining Kansas Resource Targets

    24. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 CO2 EOR impact in Kansas will be significant…. just how significant will be determined by future events.

    25. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Convergence

    26. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Potential CO2 EOR in Kansas “Technically feasible” Kansas target is very large compared to current production. Immediate target is relatively small compared to current EOR in US, mostly in West Texas. Long term target could be much larger “Technically feasible” Kansas target is very large compared to current production. Immediate target is relatively small compared to current EOR in US, mostly in West Texas. Long term target could be much larger

    27. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Impact of Technology on Kansas Oil Production CO2 Kansas would be the recovery if one used all CO2 from all current Ethanol plants and fertilizer plants in Kansas. The "other" would be if we could bring in a lot more CO2 from outside the state of Kansas. CO2 Kansas would be the recovery if one used all CO2 from all current Ethanol plants and fertilizer plants in Kansas. The "other" would be if we could bring in a lot more CO2 from outside the state of Kansas.

    28. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Why not Kansas?

    29. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Why not Kansas?

    30. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Current CO2 Used for EOR

    31. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Kansas Strengths and Challenges for CO2 EOR CCS Development

    32. KSU – CHE 670 January 7, 2010 Kansas Oil’s next generation?

More Related